Comments on: Intel introduces Atom, CPU for gadgets http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/ Hot info about new scene releases! Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:33:08 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: zhmus http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-289841 zhmus Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:18:26 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-289841 do you wnat to enjoy your life now? what do they do to relax theirselves? want to know,come here.ill show you what i search? look at the super star,listen some music,diy-t-shirt http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICD_LGeCq58 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sfJhhN1rcA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V19SvSUYYOs http://www.diy-t-shirt.com do you wnat to enjoy your life now?

what do they do to relax theirselves?
want to know,come here.ill show you what i search?
look at the super star,listen some music,diy-t-shirt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICD_LGeCq58
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sfJhhN1rcA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V19SvSUYYOs

http://www.diy-t-shirt.com

]]> By: Mikey http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-288447 Mikey Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:36:53 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-288447 3W of power consumption isnt going to run hot at all 3W of power consumption isnt going to run hot at all

]]> By: anthonyCOSMiC http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-288298 anthonyCOSMiC Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:56:09 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-288298 i would fry this chip in seconds... micro heatsink please. i would fry this chip in seconds…
micro heatsink please.

]]> By: zak http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287879 zak Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:41:29 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287879 The sub-$200 dollar portable pc-compatible computer is coming, and Intel thinks it can milk the 'toys-for-rich-idiots' market that so notably DOES NOT, AND WILL NOT EXIST for restricted performance PC's. In other words, Intel still does not get it. The cheapest atom still prices itself out of the ultra-cheap (and soon to be massively successful) products. Intel will change its strategy, but not until the competition has got a good foothold. At the moment, price (of the CPU/chipset) is everything. Performance has only to be good enough to browse at the rez of these devices (other commonly required apps need less processing power than this). However, it would be nice if the coming second-gen products can decode video at their native rez. All other far less important 'power-app' requirements (like decoding hidef video to an external output) can wait til the third gen, at which time Intel will be offering a sensible price range. Intel may well think it is making hay while the sun is shining, and possibly delaying (or killing) the sub-$200 portable PC. This is the history of this biz. The dinosaurs taking many many months to notice that conditions have changed, and new behaviour is not only desirable, but essential. Intel, without doubt, has a process, and thus power advantage. However, if I were a manufacturer of these cheap portables, forced to use non-Intel at the mo, I'd use a removal battery, and provide two, so that one could be charging as the other was in use, allowing time-unlimited mobile use in the home, eliminating (in one sense) the power efficiency advantage of Intel's CPU's. The sub-$200 dollar portable pc-compatible computer is coming, and Intel thinks it can milk the ‘toys-for-rich-idiots’ market that so notably DOES NOT, AND WILL NOT EXIST for restricted performance PC’s. In other words, Intel still does not get it. The cheapest atom still prices itself out of the ultra-cheap (and soon to be massively successful) products.

Intel will change its strategy, but not until the competition has got a good foothold. At the moment, price (of the CPU/chipset) is everything. Performance has only to be good enough to browse at the rez of these devices (other commonly required apps need less processing power than this). However, it would be nice if the coming second-gen products can decode video at their native rez. All other far less important ‘power-app’ requirements (like decoding hidef video to an external output) can wait til the third gen, at which time Intel will be offering a sensible price range.

Intel may well think it is making hay while the sun is shining, and possibly delaying (or killing) the sub-$200 portable PC. This is the history of this biz. The dinosaurs taking many many months to notice that conditions have changed, and new behaviour is not only desirable, but essential.

Intel, without doubt, has a process, and thus power advantage. However, if I were a manufacturer of these cheap portables, forced to use non-Intel at the mo, I’d use a removal battery, and provide two, so that one could be charging as the other was in use, allowing time-unlimited mobile use in the home, eliminating (in one sense) the power efficiency advantage of Intel’s CPU’s.

]]> By: allu http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287811 allu Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:24:35 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287811 old news kek :) old news kek :)

]]> By: genex3m http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287809 genex3m Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:18:56 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287809 abt time. ati and nvidia, get ur asses rolling! cant wait to see PDAs with full blown cpu n gpu. lol. now we need only cooling system....liquid nitro....lol abt time. ati and nvidia, get ur asses rolling! cant wait to see PDAs with full blown cpu n gpu. lol. now we need only cooling system….liquid nitro….lol

]]> By: H http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287766 H Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:08:10 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287766 First...woot First…woot

]]> By: Lennard http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287707 Lennard Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:01:07 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287707 I think this chip is going to be in the coming mobile and PDA phones. All that mobiles need now is a tiny fan cooling it down silently. I think this chip is going to be in the coming mobile and PDA phones. All that mobiles need now is a tiny fan cooling it down silently.

]]> By: jbondsr http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287679 jbondsr Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:34:29 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287679 Will this be able to compete with the "Cell" processor that's being redesigned for hand-held devices? I'd like to see something like this in a future PMP player, so we could finally see some decent codec support (without converting) and long battery life. The closest thing we have to that today is probably the Cowon A3 or perhaps the Archos 7 series. Will this be able to compete with the “Cell” processor that’s being redesigned for hand-held devices?

I’d like to see something like this in a future PMP player, so we could finally see some decent codec support (without converting) and long battery life.

The closest thing we have to that today is probably the Cowon A3 or perhaps the Archos 7 series.

]]> By: johns http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287676 johns Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:23:49 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287676 So, is this cpu gonna be for small laptops like the EEE or it will be fitted in PDAs??? So, is this cpu gonna be for small laptops like the EEE or it will be fitted in PDAs???

]]> By: braindo http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287673 braindo Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:21:33 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287673 Mr. Know it All #7, Take a look at the name of #1 and #3. Cross you fingers for the bannination! Mr. Know it All #7,

Take a look at the name of #1 and #3.

Cross you fingers for the bannination!

]]> By: Sp4rkR4t http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287665 Sp4rkR4t Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:59:08 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287665 The 9" EEE with the higher end 533Mhz bus + hyperthreading version of this chip will pwn and I can't wait to get my hands on it. In the tech demo they showeed it playing Half-Life 2. The 9″ EEE with the higher end 533Mhz bus + hyperthreading version of this chip will pwn and I can’t wait to get my hands on it. In the tech demo they showeed it playing Half-Life 2.

]]> By: Mr. Know It All http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287661 Mr. Know It All Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:51:55 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287661 LOL @3...nope, you're late for 1st by a minute. pwned noob!!! This is more of a cpu for smaller devices. Trust me, i know. LOL @3…nope, you’re late for 1st by a minute. pwned noob!!!

This is more of a cpu for smaller devices. Trust me, i know.

]]> By: Coma http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287655 Coma Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:43:33 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287655 Who cares? It's x86 in a handheld! Who cares? It’s x86 in a handheld!

]]> By: Benjiro http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/comment-page-1/#comment-287648 Benjiro Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:20:22 +0000 http://www.rlslog.net/intel-introduces-atom-cpu-for-gadgets/#comment-287648 4: "1.86GHz in a DPA… *drools*". Stop drooling. Its a 2 thread "In Order" CPU. Performence wise its on par with a 900Mhz Celleron. Its not full blown Core2 Cpu running on 1.86Ghz. A lot of people are going to be fooled by this. Its designed to use little power, with low manufacturing costs. 4:
“1.86GHz in a DPA… *drools*”.

Stop drooling. Its a 2 thread “In Order” CPU. Performence wise its on par with a 900Mhz Celleron. Its not full blown Core2 Cpu running on 1.86Ghz. A lot of people are going to be fooled by this.

Its designed to use little power, with low manufacturing costs.

]]>