<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: Viacom&#8217;s $1bn suit threatens Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/</link>
	<description>Hot info about new scene releases!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:40:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Learn to use the search function</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342837</link>
		<dc:creator>Learn to use the search function</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342837</guid>
		<description>I hate to break it to you all, but Viacom DOES have their own channel on YouTube. I think they have commenting disabled on their page though, after receiving several thousand &quot;F U&quot; types of comments from other users who had their videos deleted thanks to Viacoms complaints.

@26 thizzle - No, you&#039;re not the only one. There are many brain dead idiots like you who have all the class of a trailer park garbage dumpster.


@30 gunnersfan - Oh, just STFU a$$hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to break it to you all, but Viacom DOES have their own channel on YouTube. I think they have commenting disabled on their page though, after receiving several thousand &#8220;F U&#8221; types of comments from other users who had their videos deleted thanks to Viacoms complaints.</p>
<p>@26 thizzle &#8211; No, you&#8217;re not the only one. There are many brain dead idiots like you who have all the class of a trailer park garbage dumpster.</p>
<p>@30 gunnersfan &#8211; Oh, just STFU a$$hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dosguy</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342708</link>
		<dc:creator>dosguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342708</guid>
		<description>Screw Viacom.  They should be paying Google for the free publicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw Viacom.  They should be paying Google for the free publicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epiquestions</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342392</link>
		<dc:creator>epiquestions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 00:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342392</guid>
		<description>@ GrendelNorm

Well if Viacom loses this Google(Youtube) can counter-sue them for emotional damages and probably get more than a billion :D
hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ GrendelNorm</p>
<p>Well if Viacom loses this Google(Youtube) can counter-sue them for emotional damages and probably get more than a billion <img src='http://www.rlslog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nutek</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342361</link>
		<dc:creator>nutek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342361</guid>
		<description>leave youtube alone viacom you big bully</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>leave youtube alone viacom you big bully</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunnersfan</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342335</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnersfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342335</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe any poster would defend Google here.

They absolutely knew what they were getting in to when they bought Youtube.The wink and nod towards the big media companies about copyright infringement was all BS by Google.

Not that the media companies are exempt from scorn,as they deserve a bunch.To act like google isn&#039;t deserving of some here is ridiculous.

&quot;Google says the threat comes from Viacom’s attempt to make “carriers and hosting providers” liable for what people post.&quot;

Notice what they didn&#039;t say in that statement:Who was liable.

They try to say it shouldn&#039;t be their fault,so who do you think they want Viacom to blame?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe any poster would defend Google here.</p>
<p>They absolutely knew what they were getting in to when they bought Youtube.The wink and nod towards the big media companies about copyright infringement was all BS by Google.</p>
<p>Not that the media companies are exempt from scorn,as they deserve a bunch.To act like google isn&#8217;t deserving of some here is ridiculous.</p>
<p>&#8220;Google says the threat comes from Viacom’s attempt to make “carriers and hosting providers” liable for what people post.&#8221;</p>
<p>Notice what they didn&#8217;t say in that statement:Who was liable.</p>
<p>They try to say it shouldn&#8217;t be their fault,so who do you think they want Viacom to blame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El-Dopa</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342332</link>
		<dc:creator>El-Dopa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342332</guid>
		<description>F#ck Viacom ... I&#039;ll make sure I&#039;ll download Comedy Central and MTV sh!t instead of buying it.  They&#039;re going down - mark my words - just as SCO.  Fight &quot;the people&quot; and loose, you $$$-MoFo&#039;s ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F#ck Viacom &#8230; I&#8217;ll make sure I&#8217;ll download Comedy Central and MTV sh!t instead of buying it.  They&#8217;re going down &#8211; mark my words &#8211; just as SCO.  Fight &#8220;the people&#8221; and loose, you $$$-MoFo&#8217;s &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schonke</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342316</link>
		<dc:creator>Schonke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342316</guid>
		<description>The most probable reasons that they want their own site are probably that they want some DRM protection, ads in the middle of the video and restrict access depending on the viewer&#039;s location. On top of that the managers/finance department most likely don&#039;t appreciate the cost of running a high bandwidth server.

Even if they do succeed in making YouTube remove all their content and launch their own site, I can&#039;t really see myself watching their site unless it&#039;s as simple as youtube, allowing me to fast forward and backward in the clip and send the link to friends as easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most probable reasons that they want their own site are probably that they want some DRM protection, ads in the middle of the video and restrict access depending on the viewer&#8217;s location. On top of that the managers/finance department most likely don&#8217;t appreciate the cost of running a high bandwidth server.</p>
<p>Even if they do succeed in making YouTube remove all their content and launch their own site, I can&#8217;t really see myself watching their site unless it&#8217;s as simple as youtube, allowing me to fast forward and backward in the clip and send the link to friends as easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just an Aussie</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342300</link>
		<dc:creator>Just an Aussie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342300</guid>
		<description>Viacom doesn&#039;t want their stuff on YouTube because they have their own online video sites such as www.thedailyshow.com, so they&#039;re well aware of the benefits of putting their videos online.

They just want to keep 100% of the ad revenue for themselves.

Except they don&#039;t actually make money from posting their videos online, which is what the writers strike was all about.

So on one hand they&#039;re saying they&#039;re losing money hand over fist because of Youtube, but on the other they&#039;re telling their writers there was never any money to be made in the first place.

I&#039;m confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viacom doesn&#8217;t want their stuff on YouTube because they have their own online video sites such as <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedailyshow.com</a>, so they&#8217;re well aware of the benefits of putting their videos online.</p>
<p>They just want to keep 100% of the ad revenue for themselves.</p>
<p>Except they don&#8217;t actually make money from posting their videos online, which is what the writers strike was all about.</p>
<p>So on one hand they&#8217;re saying they&#8217;re losing money hand over fist because of Youtube, but on the other they&#8217;re telling their writers there was never any money to be made in the first place.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342231</link>
		<dc:creator>thizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342231</guid>
		<description>am i the only one who uses youtube only to watch hot chicks shake their asses. not really anything interesting on that site. dont know why it gets so many people on it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am i the only one who uses youtube only to watch hot chicks shake their asses. not really anything interesting on that site. dont know why it gets so many people on it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muddawg</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342218</link>
		<dc:creator>muddawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342218</guid>
		<description>@24

I was thinking the same as you.  If Viacom had their own channel on youtube, they could potentially profit from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@24</p>
<p>I was thinking the same as you.  If Viacom had their own channel on youtube, they could potentially profit from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schonke</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342124</link>
		<dc:creator>Schonke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342124</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but I&#039;m fairly sure that Youtube offer their big users a share of the ad revenues generated by their content. At least they discussed that previously.

Also, the smartest move for Viacom would probably be making an agreement with Youtube through which they get part of the revenue from ads that they post on their &quot;channel&quot;. Not only would this give Viacom some money in their pocket, it would also lower the amount of Viacom clips posted by other users.
Add this together with increased publicity and consumer goodwill and I bet they would have a lot to gain, especially in higher DVD sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but I&#8217;m fairly sure that Youtube offer their big users a share of the ad revenues generated by their content. At least they discussed that previously.</p>
<p>Also, the smartest move for Viacom would probably be making an agreement with Youtube through which they get part of the revenue from ads that they post on their &#8220;channel&#8221;. Not only would this give Viacom some money in their pocket, it would also lower the amount of Viacom clips posted by other users.<br />
Add this together with increased publicity and consumer goodwill and I bet they would have a lot to gain, especially in higher DVD sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Jardon</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342078</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Jardon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342078</guid>
		<description>Hang on guys - YouTube was purchased by Google for $1.65 billion (in Google stock)

If all copyrighted content was removed from YT, there would be very little left there. So, traffic would drop and the website would certainly be worth no where near $1.65 billion.

The Google parasite has deep pockets and it&#039;s time for them to cough some cash!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hang on guys &#8211; YouTube was purchased by Google for $1.65 billion (in Google stock)</p>
<p>If all copyrighted content was removed from YT, there would be very little left there. So, traffic would drop and the website would certainly be worth no where near $1.65 billion.</p>
<p>The Google parasite has deep pockets and it&#8217;s time for them to cough some cash!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342063</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342063</guid>
		<description>As a result of watching various YouTube clips i have gone out and bought various DVDs - YouTube is a handy way to get interested in a movie or a series and check it out a bit before buying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a result of watching various YouTube clips i have gone out and bought various DVDs &#8211; YouTube is a handy way to get interested in a movie or a series and check it out a bit before buying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: /b/tard</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342019</link>
		<dc:creator>/b/tard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342019</guid>
		<description>Viacom greedy? Google are making lots of money with Youtube and Viacom just want a share of the money that&#039;s all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viacom greedy? Google are making lots of money with Youtube and Viacom just want a share of the money that&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/comment-page-1/#comment-342008</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlslog.net/google-viacoms-1bn-suit-threatens-net/#comment-342008</guid>
		<description>viacom is the devil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>viacom is the devil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

