Releaselog

Frontline From Jesus To Christ The First Christians HDTV XviD-EPiSODE

EPiSODE has released the Frontline From Jesus To Christ The First Christians .The epic story of the rise of Christianity and explore the life and death of Jesus, and the men and women whose belief, conviction, and martyrdom created the religion we now know as Christianity . We hope you enjoy your Christmas celebrations :)

Links: HOMEPAGE

Frontline.From.Jesus.To.Christ.The.First.Christians.HDTV.XviD-EPiSODE
XviD | MP3 VBR | 1.38GB
NFONTi – DOWNLOAD :- CD1CD2

Comments (52)

Feel free to post your Frontline From Jesus To Christ The First Christians HDTV XviD-EPiSODE torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. Anton
    December 25th, 2009 | 09:52

    Hail Satan. DESTROY CHRISTIANITY AND ALL OTHER RELIGIONS.

  2. andjel
    December 25th, 2009 | 10:03

    thanks for this release. and happy christ-mas to all. this day is made so that everyone could be happy

  3. nicky
    December 25th, 2009 | 10:11
  4. maestro_za
    December 25th, 2009 | 10:12

    @Anton … you’re a dumb ass. Go join Satan why don’t u … peace to all!

  5. charlumi
    December 25th, 2009 | 10:40

    Poor Anton. He has nothing.

    Please, MU link?

  6. DDLmania
    December 25th, 2009 | 10:50

    Frontline.From.Jesus.To.Christ.The.First.Christians.HDTV.XviD-EPiSODE

    http://depositfiles.com/files/s11sp63v6
    http://depositfiles.com/files/ll3511cz8

  7. SuperLOL
    December 25th, 2009 | 11:28

    Jesus LOL

  8. Alessandro
    December 25th, 2009 | 11:40

    JESUS has already defeated the satan and the satan’s disciples.

  9. do it
    December 25th, 2009 | 12:50

    oehhh another supposed true story of a fake tale told only to children
    & continued to b a real religion
    santa is fake kids & this whole religion
    based on a jew that dead for sins of us all & now is a new religion
    & stories of satan made to scare us to believe in Christianity
    this could b a bad movie of the year oeehh wait insane mel already did it

  10. common sense
    December 25th, 2009 | 13:45

    Ok @16, PROVE it is fake. You can no more prove it is fake then they can prove it is real and the only way to prove it is to die and come back and tell us if there actually is something on the other side or if there is nothing at all. So lets think on this. Say you have two people and one is basically good who helps the poor-gives to charity-loves their family and is faithful to their spouse-would give the shirt off their back to anyone who asked for it and would never harm another person even if their life depended on it, …then you have the other person who is the exact opposite. Both of them die. Now let’s say here is nothing afterword. Exactly what harm was done for this one person to believe different? They made a major difference in peoples lives and will be remembered for it, a form of immortality if you will, while the other will soon be forgotten. Ok now reverse it and after they both die they find out that the one who believed in a divine being was right all along and both stand to be judged for their life’s works. In this case, “oooops’s…sorry bout that” I think just is not going to cut it. So as long as they are not doing any harm to you or anyone you know, then why the reason for your vile post?

  11. Rational Thinking
    December 25th, 2009 | 16:34

    @17– Who says I have to believe in a zombie jew to find favor in the afterlife? Or a pedophile arab, or an egyptian raised jewish prince turned prophet or an alien overlord who wiped out a trillion souls?

    If you live a good life then all those religions guarantee some sort of pay off in the afterlife. So basically I can live life as a decent, cultured, intelligent, rational thinking human being and no matter what I will be alright when I die. So what’s the point of believing? What’s the point of propping up corrupt leaders in the world’s religions and accepting the pain they bring to the world?

    And what if they’re wrong and there is nothing when you die? That means I wasted a bunch of time, energy and devotion to absolutely nothing productive. All that time in church, temple, mosque is for nought.

    Believing in something that can’t be shown to be true is truly a waste. Understanding the universe through observation and testing is clearly superior because then you know you are seeing the truth. To borrow a phrase from a famous Jew who live a couple millenia ago “The truth will set you free”, just not his truth.

  12. Netjunkie
    December 25th, 2009 | 16:53

    I knew there would be deriding comments toward Christianity in this thread. You complain that religion is pushed on you, but yet you come in here and spout your rhetoric. You only make yourselves look bitter and foolish. Typical atheists filled with hate.

  13. prophet Jezus
    December 25th, 2009 | 17:27

    The jews killed Jezus and are constant changing the bible to their needs.. Their is only 1 true relegion and we all know witch one, the most growing relegion;
    There is only ONE true GOD;

  14. Evil Santa
    December 25th, 2009 | 18:02

    @20 Allahu Akbar ! KA-BOOOOOOOMMMMMM !!!

  15. common sense
    December 25th, 2009 | 22:10

    Ok @18, lets use your twisted logic here. You said “Believing in something that can’t be shown to be true is truly a waste.” Ok Show me a neutrino or a quark or even a tacheion. Each one of these moves faster then the speed of light and science says they exist, yet science also says the speed of light is the top speed in the universe…so exactly how can they both be true? They BOTH are “.. Is a law, in essence, something which has no detractors –> a unifying ‘concept’ for which scientists (at the present time) are in accordance with? Is a law a single idea by which all scientists, regardless of discipline, conform? Can a theory be looked at as a ‘transitory’ law (i.e., a law in waiting)? In contrast to a law, is it correct to say that there can be several scientific theories about a particular phenomena whereas a law represents a single unified agreement among all scientists”. Hence There is a divine being and there isnt. And one more thing child…please exaplin what exactly was the outside force that acted upon the universe in it’s condensed form that caused the big bang. Newton stated nothing has an effect without having a cause first. And if everything was already packed into the universe before the big bang, then that scientifically and logically means that something OUTSIDE of normality had to act upon it to cause it to explode. So how can you state that this wasn’t a divine power, you can no more prove it wasn’t then I can that it was. Therefor only a fool and an idiot will say “there is no God” without having documented set in stone proof as all this would mean is it is that persons opinion and nothing more. Just like the ones that say there is a God. As such the weight of the believers carries just as much validity in science as the non believers as neither can prove what they say.

    And need I remind you that even Richard Dawkins in his 1986 book The Blind Watchmaker acknowledges this problem when he admits, “Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” (7, pg. 76) freely admitted that the possibility of a God Exists!!! And Evolutionist F. Hitching was still pondering in a 1982 book entitled The Neck of the Giraffe, “Is it really plausible that thousands upon thousands of lucky chance mutations happened coincidentally so that the lens and the retina, which cannot work without each other, evolved in synchrony? What survival value can there be in an eye that doesn’t see?” (1, pgs. 36-39)

    And finally about the only example ever given of a positive mutation is sickle-cell anemia. People carrying sickle-cell hemoglobin are resistant to malaria. But sickle-cell anemia is a disease; it kills people. Further, the mutation does not produce genetic information that leads to a new species. Just a newer version of a disease that kills.

    So try and tell us again that Christ did not exist when records of the babylonian Empire clearly show they did trade with a man called Jesus of Nazareth? Your whole argument is destroyed in three paragraphs, what a flimsy little thing your beliefs are to be destroyed that easily.

  16. satan's, err... "santa's" lil helper
    December 25th, 2009 | 22:16

    if only they had corvettes and strippers back in the day. then we wouldn’t have to deal with the remnants jesus’s mid-life crisis.

  17. mrflibble
    December 26th, 2009 | 00:15

    @22 “common sense”

    Wow, just… wow.

    Firstly you haven’t made a single compelling argument concerning Jesus, instead you’ve rambled incessantly and then tacked on something about records of a guy called Jesus. I noticed you stopped citing your references here.

  18. wow
    December 26th, 2009 | 01:06

    …nothing like a good old fashioned philosophical or theological debate on releaselog

    here – i have THE ANSWER for everyone:

    “to download, or not to download — THAT is the question!”

    HA!

  19. common sense
    December 26th, 2009 | 01:49

    @25, I have made a better argument then anything you or any other Christ hater has made. You say he didnt exist? Well the babylonian Empire records say that you dont know what your talking about as they have records dealing with him for furniture. Roman records from these days show a taxation report dealing with a Carpenter named Joseph-his wife mary and son Jesus. So I guess now the Roman Empire and the babylonian Empire both are wrong because you and your Christ hating buddy’s say so?

    You see your problem is simple. There is proof enough to prove a man by this name did actually live and exist exactly as the Bible says he did. Now was he the son of some Deity? You will know for sure once you die and not till then except if you believe. As such you can’t prove Jesus didnt exist and history can prove he did. The ONLY debate you and your kind seem to have is if he was a deity or not, and again…you cannot prove there is no God anymore then the believers can prove there is with rock solid facts. All you can do is state what you take on faith, and that sir is a form of religion in and of itself. Because both of you have no proof of your claims, as such you both (believers and non believers) must take it on faith that your points are correct. Case closed. So why get into stupid arguments that neither side can win?? That is what you and all the Christ haters that post attacks and vile statements should be asking yourselves, and this is why we classify people who start arguments as you and @18 and @16 have done as trolls. So go back under your bridge little ones before the billy goats kick your arses yet again as they have more sense in their tail hairs then you three have proven you have in your entire lives.

  20. BenD
    December 26th, 2009 | 02:07

    SHUT THE ‘EFFIN’ HELL UP, Y’ALL KNOW NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY N.O.T.H.I.N.G…

  21. Kakkoii
    December 26th, 2009 | 05:51

    @27: Firstly, it’s not that we hate Christ. But that we care about humanity and our societies future. Thus we do our best to try and help people break free of their child hood brain washing.

    Now on Neutrino’s… There’s a little thing called “deductive reasoning”. You can’t see a black hole for instance, but you can deduce from observations of the area near it that it is there. Because it is having an effect on it’s surroundings.

    Oh and also:

    Quark:
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090309131725.htm

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091207123922.htm

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090318140618.htm

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061213174346.htm

    Neutrino:
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091215141512.htm

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091127141406.htm

    Tachyon:
    Nobody said it’s a fact they exist. They are merely theoretical, there’s no real evidence to support them yet.

    Try keeping up with science news :) . Might help you become a bit more educated if you read the latest science articles every morning at sciencedaily.com. Or at least a few of the ones that interest you once a week.

    The scientific law is merely defined by our current knowledge. If some evidence comes our way that disproves a certain law, then revisions will be made accordingly. We don’t become stubborn and just ignore the evidence and say “no way! This is a law! It cannot be changed!” Science would be nowhere today if we did that.

    On the subject of the big bang, that’s your current view of the big bang theory. Another is that the universe has always existed. And that merely due to entropy, gravity and black holes the universe starts to collapse back in on itself. with an exponentially increasing force of gravity as it’s mass becomes heavier and heavier. The mass eventually becomes so great until it’s condensed to it’s limit. Once it reach’s this limit, it explodes back out, and the creation of a universe starts all over again. Planets and galaxy slowly forming over billions of years.

    But again this is just a theory. Not many people are claiming that this is 100% FACT. We are merely saying this is our best guess with our current knowledge. We are not basing our lives around it like you would a religion.

    About the lens and retina. Hitching must not of known what we know now about the evolution of eyes. Eyes didn’t always have lenses. They started out as just a tiny dot in some sea organisms that could detect the brightness of it’s surroundings. And there were a ton of stages after that I’m not going to go into, but:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye

    Also about our own evolution:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXdQRvSdLAs

    And sure, Jesus could have existed. We don’t really care so much about that. It’s merely the stories. Back in those days writings were very dramatized. Not to mention translations of the original text doesn’t come out as literal as one might like it too. Not to mention you miss out on a lot of the context and understood side meanings of things that was known in those days. (The same as say “I would kill for a piece of cake!” We don’t really mean we would kill for it. It’s just an expression that we want it really bad. The bible consists of stories written by a few different people who lived after Jesus’s supposed death also. It would have more validity if they lived during the actual events they speak of.

    You also have to take into account that back in those days people didn’t even understand why the sun rose. They believed it was an act performed by some god. They lacked the scientific knowledge to give rational explanations for most things they experienced. So their descriptions of events were based on their scientific knowledge back then. They had no other reasonable explanations for what they were seeing except “god did it!” or “it’s magic!”. Hell, we were still accusing people of being witch’s and killing them up until the 18th century.

    Then there’s the problem of there being so many different religions. It shows that it’s been commonplace in our history to exaggerate and make up stories to try and explain things.

    ********
    And I really hope you will take the time to watch QualiaSoup’s videos. (It isn’t some guy ranting on a webcam.)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wV_REEdvxo&feature=channel

    I really urge you to take a serious watch of them, or at least some of them.
    ********

  22. the_unknowable
    December 26th, 2009 | 10:43

    It’s must be hard pill to swollow when your parents are trying to tell you that santa claus doesn’t exist. It’s the same thing all over again for people who are brainwashed by their religion.

    We don’t need “a man in the sky” to be good people. If anything, religions create irresponsible people who attribute the good to their deity and blame their bad intentions on satan (or whatever your religion calls “the bad guy”) so they don’t ever have to take personal responsibility.

    Wether you are a believer or not, intention is what counts, not your beliefs or what you think you know.

  23. Pumba
    December 26th, 2009 | 17:16

    Well, there is certainly much proof if one wants to look.
    However what I find easier is if you read Revelations you will find many passages that deal with what is happening today. The Bible revealed the economic downfall of the United States. It also revealed that a one-world government will come into place. This is which is currently under way. It also tells everyone not to accept the marl of the beast on the right hand or on the forehead by which you will not be able to buy or sell anything without this mark.
    Britain already has plans that by 2017 they will inject everyone with a RFID chip to facilitate purchase transactions and also so that they can know where you are at all times.
    Strange, but anyone that knows Revelations KNOWS the end time is near.
    I am Christian and I really feel sorry for anyone who refuses to believe in Christ. But your proof, as you call it, will be when one day millions of Christians simply vanish in thin air (the Rapture) for then you will be given a final chance to come to the Lord, but you will go through Tribulation to get there.
    We Christians cannot convince people like you, but it is strange that an average Christian is happy and at peace and all non-Christians are never happy because they seek fulfillment in materialistic things.
    Take a chance and watch with an open mind Jack Van Impe weekly show or find his broadcast on the internet.
    You may very well finally get a better understanding.

    Nuf said!

  24. pooler
    December 26th, 2009 | 20:30

    “Well the babylonian Empire records say that you dont know what your talking about as they have records dealing with him for furniture.”

    So, Jesus sold furniture to the Babylonian Empire?! This is the funniest thing ever… Jesus should’ve stayed in the furniture business. And how much did he charge for a bookshelf?

    (On a side note: The Babylonian Empire ended 500 years B.C.! Learn your history. And why would they import their furniture from Nazareth, some 400km away?)

    Furthermore, for all the things Jesus was supposed to have done, all you get is some “tax reports” from his family? A bit weak, don’t you think?

  25. common sense
    December 27th, 2009 | 01:25

    Ok @30 and @32, since you refuse to believe historical records, then here is your challenge. YOU PROVE HE DID NOT EXIST. You opened your mouths now you have to own up or shut up. The ball is in your court. Show your proof that he didnt exist. And we need historical documents, not the beliefs of other peoples.

    You started this now you finish it. Prove there was never any man named Jesus.

    And no @32, I never said this was the same man that is in the bible, all I am saying is that there actually was a man naed Jesus that according to Roman Tax rolls and Babylonian records, actually existed. You say he didnt exist, now you need to prove your statement/back it up with historical data. You can do that…right? Or are you and your other Christ Haters buddies here like all the others, all mouth and no fact. You and your buddies have been challenged, either prove Christ didnt exist or crawl back into whatever hole of ignorance you crawled out from.

  26. sex is my religion its real
    December 27th, 2009 | 01:28
  27. Failgator
    December 27th, 2009 | 11:21

    @22

    Speed of light: The speed of light is not the fastest possible movement in the universe, it is simply a physical constant – nothing more and nothing less.

    Big bang: Under the quantum mechanics model, quantum fluctuations are an accepted possibility of “causing” the big bang.

    Hence There is a divine being and there isnt: You can not claim what exists outside of our realm. It is only possible to state what does not exist. Likewise, science can not “prove” anything, yet it can disprove anything.

    The Neck of the Giraffe: Seriously? This reveals that you blindly copy and pasted some ridiculous argument. Francis Hitching is not even a scientist – he has zero credentials and education. He is a British author with interests in pseudoscience.

    Richard Dawkins: Again, completely ridiculous quote mining. Instead of simply reading and believing an argument, why not actually look up the quote? Try reading the NEXT paragraph, as he explains why the above statement is a poor argument.

    Sickle-cell anaemia: RIDICULOUS! Yes, sickle-cell anaemia is a disease which dramatically reduces one’s life span. However, in malaria endemic regions; such as Sub-Saharan Africa, sickle-cell anaemia results in a net increase in life expectancy, as malaria kills at a younger age. As a result, sickle-cell anaemia would be selected for in malaria endemic regions, and selected against in non malaria infected regions.

    Sickle-cell anaemia is the homozygous genotype of the sickle-cell allele. You forgot to mention to heterozygous sickle-cell trait, which not only has minimal effect on life expectancy, but also provides adequate immunity against malaria.
    Of course sickle-cell anaemia would not result in speciation, for it a small genetic modification.

    If that is the only example of a positive mutation, you obviously have not looked very hard. Bacteria/viruses gaining immunity against antibiotics/antivirals, E-coli gaining the ability to digest nylon, etc.

    Try harder.

  28. Kakkoii
    December 27th, 2009 | 12:55

    @33
    How about you take note of your user name and use a little common sense. Prove Christ didn’t exist you say? Ok, well then I ask you to prove magical unicorns and genies that grant wishes don’t exist! Shoe me some hard “facts” and evidence that they don’t exist! After all, there’s many tales written about them.

    You can’t. The reason we know they are not real is because it defies “common sense”. We know these things aren’t possible through scientific investigation and deductive reasoning of the world around us. Sure, we can’t say 100% that there is no possible way at all that they could exist. Because we do not know everything there is to know about the universe yet. But we know enough to say that it is incredibly unlikely that they could exist.

  29. Kakkoii
    December 27th, 2009 | 12:55

    How about you take note of your user name and use a little common sense. Prove Christ didn’t exist you say? Ok, well then I ask you to prove magical unicorns and genies that grant wishes don’t exist! Shoe me some hard “facts” and evidence that they don’t exist! After all, there’s many tales written about them.

    You can’t. The reason we know they are not real is because it defies “common sense”. We know these things aren’t possible through scientific investigation and deductive reasoning of the world around us. Sure, we can’t say 100% that there is no possible way at all that they could exist. Because we do not know everything there is to know about the universe yet. But we know enough to say that it is incredibly unlikely that they could exist.

  30. Kakkoii
    December 27th, 2009 | 12:56

    Testing… for some reason my reply isn’t going through..

  31. Kakkoii
    December 27th, 2009 | 13:00

    Hmm, looks like I have to make a second short comment to make previous ones go through…

  32. Kakkoii
    December 27th, 2009 | 13:00

    Guess it has to be one sentence, hope this works.

  33. Kakkoii
    December 27th, 2009 | 13:01

    Bah…

  34. infinity
    December 27th, 2009 | 13:32

    Kakkoii, agreed. The problem is that brainwashing defeats common sense. Religious brainwashing, especially of children, should be considered a crime.
    For people like 33 and 31 it’s obviously too late. Thank the gawd of common sense they will be raptured soon. *cough* yeah right *cough*
    :D

  35. Mad Dave
    December 27th, 2009 | 14:00

    ITT : Atheist Nazis who wish to force their beliefs on other people.

  36. jw
    December 27th, 2009 | 17:01

    btw stoked on this docu, whether jesus was real or not!

  37. Failgator
    December 27th, 2009 | 17:36

    @43

    Oh yes, it seems that having a nonconforming rational discourse is now akin to Nazism.

  38. do it
    December 27th, 2009 | 20:44

    common sense it is indeed to late to help you
    you want to be the 25% that is brain washed o k go head
    you already prove it on your own by that good guy bad guy plot
    you are talking about the basics of forced fear
    i will say it again & again being forced by fear into a religion is not a religion it is in real fact intimidation
    i fear for myself & for the worlds sake
    you should put religion a little to the side

    go meet some1 & have good old sex
    its real & you can see & feel it as well

  39. Kakkoii
    December 27th, 2009 | 22:20

    Maybe one more time….

  40. Kakkoii
    December 28th, 2009 | 00:45

    Cmon posts… go through..

  41. Kakkoii
    December 28th, 2009 | 03:35

    Damnit RLSLOG! Fix your comment system lol

  42. scoobysnacks
    December 28th, 2009 | 04:26

    @Kakkoii, dude I think some of your posts don’t get through because you maybe used some words that got rejected by a swearfilter or something. I could be wrong…

  43. Kakkoii
    December 28th, 2009 | 04:52

    @50 Nah, I make sure not to. It seems to be some sort of a bug. Because I posted 36 and 37, but they never showed up. Then I posted again a little later, and they suddenly both appeared. And there’s still a few that aren’t working. So somethings funky.

    Can’t seem to post the quote for Russell’s Teapot.

  44. Kakkoii
    December 28th, 2009 | 04:53

    Grr…

  45. Kakkoii
    December 28th, 2009 | 05:36

    And a second time to make the post go through.

  46. Kakkoii
    December 28th, 2009 | 05:37

    Grr….

  47. common sense
    December 28th, 2009 | 15:43

    @36/37 and 42/46, why am I not surprised by your answers. You do not even once provide one historical document that shows a man called Jesus did not exist as you claim. Instead you resort to childish schoolyard attacks on someone that dares challenge what you said. That is the sole proof that anyone who reads this need have to show that you are so insecure in your beliefs that you go into a rage when someone challenges them and you constantly have to do anything you can to anyone you can who dares question your view of history. A sure sign of someone needing help from a psychiatrist. Keep this up and sooner or later the men in the white suits will come and dress you in a nice white suit that ties in the back and take you for an extended stay in a rubber room.

  48. Rational Thinking
    December 28th, 2009 | 16:44

    Looks like the comments need to be approved before they show up. Hopefully the mods will have some sense of the truth and allow the words I wrote to speak them :)

  49. Kakkoii
    December 28th, 2009 | 20:31

    @55:

    Your being a hypocrite there. You obviously didn’t really read what I said, because I never attacked you. I put forth logical rebuttals towards what you had said in post 33. It doesn’t matter if Jesus lived or not. I wasn’t arguing about that. So try reading it again and then reply with a post that has a little substance, instead of just slander and ignorance. I put up my arguments, so try and refute them. If you can’t, then admit it instead of twisting things around to avoid what I had said.

  50. 123
    December 29th, 2009 | 01:15

    “Instead you resort to childish schoolyard attacks on someone that dares challenge what you said.”

    “A sure sign of someone needing help from a psychiatrist. Keep this up and sooner or later the men in the white suits will come and dress you in a nice white suit that ties in the back and take you for an extended stay in a rubber room.”

    Ironic

  51. Aion Kinah
    March 19th, 2010 | 04:00
  52. freedom from religion
    December 14th, 2011 | 05:02

    Religion may do some good for individuals but it has proven to divide humans. Don’t be selfish, help free humankind from all religions.

Leave a reply