Comments (113)

1. Dawg
   February 20th, 2008 | 12:58

   Live and let suck…big deal.

2. Krooner
   February 20th, 2008 | 12:58

   Saw this recently a very interesting doco, really reccomended

3. MissingLink
   February 20th, 2008 | 12:59

   Sounds promising enough. Interesting topic for a documentary. One-click-downoads as always preferred. Thank you.

4. cOtOm@s
   February 20th, 2008 | 13:02

   Thanks, but no thanks.

5. Günther
   February 20th, 2008 | 13:17

   I can’t wait until the hate starts flying on this one.

   This one’s not high on my list to watch, but I’ll get it, why not?

   –Günther

6. robz
   February 20th, 2008 | 13:18

   yeah of course. homosexuality is a sin.

7. Jeff
   February 20th, 2008 | 13:26

   Not really interested in this subject, but I’ll watch anything that makes Christians/the far-right look bad… :0P Why cant people mind their own business?

8. reggie
   February 20th, 2008 | 13:40

   It is better to debate a question without settling it than to settle a question without debating it. Joseph Joubert

   Brendan can come out of the closet now.

9. Ballbag
   February 20th, 2008 | 13:51

   Hey if a guy wants to eat another guy’s hairy ass, good luck to him.

   Thought of it makes me want to vomit in my mouth, but there you go.

10. shazaaam
    February 20th, 2008 | 13:55

    @10 maybe that guy’s hairy ass tastes better than your mom’s dirty muffin

11. busted
    February 20th, 2008 | 13:56

    “misinterpretation of the Bible.”
    Pull the other one, it’s got bells on it.

12. Drazen
    February 20th, 2008 | 14:21

    Any rapidshare links ?

13. pw
    February 20th, 2008 | 14:22

    Pull the other one, it’s got balls on it.

14. dublitze
    February 20th, 2008 | 14:34

    Bleez for GOLD°!!

15. R1pper
    February 20th, 2008 | 14:36

    4+6
    why the hell i cant post

16. R1pper
    February 20th, 2008 | 14:41

    the hell with it, i cant post nothing just complaints

17. Pandalemon
    February 20th, 2008 | 14:49

    # Leviticus 18:22 – “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; such a thing is an abomination.”
    # Leviticus 20:13 – “If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them shall be put to death…”
    1 Corinthians 6:9-10 – “…neither fornicators nor idolaters nor adulterers nor boy prostitutes nor sodomites…will inherit the kingdom of God.”

    Yeah, some ‘misinterpretation’ you got there. Just like how there’s absolutely no mistake when the bible says that God loves you and will give you eternal life … but it’s definitely a translation error when God tells you to sell all your possessions give the money to the poor. Twice.
    Luke 14:26-33
    Luke 18:18-22

18. brian may
    February 20th, 2008 | 15:00

    ass

19. xtazy
    February 20th, 2008 | 15:05

    bum… wot a load of….

20. Ksawery
    February 20th, 2008 | 15:17

    rapidshare links pls!

21. Ksawery
    February 20th, 2008 | 15:18

    found some links on warez-bb

    rapidshare.com
    http://rs-layer.com/directory-8194-8hc63esb.html

    or

    http://www.filefactory.com/file/f25b12
    http://www.filefactory.com/file/1a2357
    http://www.filefactory.com/file/e3b3f5
    http://www.filefactory.com/file/96073f
    http://www.filefactory.com/file/f9a3d9
    http://www.filefactory.com/file/7565a8
    http://www.filefactory.com/file/6b18bf

    or
    For.the.Bible.Tells.Me.So.LIMITED.DOCU.DVDRip.XviD-SAPHiRE
    http://netload.in/dateib0df70a2eaa95e866251130d1dc0780b/sph-bible.part7.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei90b92f575be5b29a01fe2d432952895e/sph-bible.part6.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei0f163848c96835cd824f8d509a4452f2/sph-bible.part5.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei544cfb3e51327bd0eb6912a69000e032/sph-bible.part4.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei2a279caa0c3b4b0b77f3b58155b4c22f/sph-bible.part3.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei0d868d704b1e8c8df70aa8f7ba91e8f9/sph-bible.part2.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei9a6aec878ac4b59c9e1c79e8987ea6b5/sph-bible.part1.rar.htm
    pass:areg

22. clueless
    February 20th, 2008 | 15:24

    My cousin, went to the local church because he needed a copy of the bible, it was a part of his homework @ school. So he went over to the church and asked the priest if he could borrow a bible for the homework purposes.

    The priest borrowed his own, personal bible (that’s what he said). My cousin then went home and started doing his homework. But when he tried to flip through the pages of the bible, the pages were all stuck together. Almos, as if they were glued together. It was something really stick on those pages.

    He told the priest about it when he returned him his personal bible. The priest said it was some holy water spilled on the bible pages.

    So i ask you guys, is holy water something sticky?

    What you think it was?

23. rossiko
    February 20th, 2008 | 15:39

    erm yes water on paper will make them stick.

    The fact that people believe in the bible is insane so it makes no difference what the interpretation is to me.

    @17 remember the bible has changed many times over the years, the book you are reading is an interpretation of an older book so i guess that is where they will try & point out an error.

24. GDesigner
    February 20th, 2008 | 15:45

    That is absurd, clueless. Whether that is a real story or not, it’s irrelevant. There are plenty of weirdos out there, and some call themselves Christians. Bottomline, we’re ALL sinners…hetero, homo, bi, etc. We ALL need God’s grace through Jesus by the Holy Spirit. There is no way, though, that you can spin Biblical prohibition against homosexual acts into a “misinterpretation”. I’ve seen this sophistry too many times to even bother checking out this release. If you want to argue that the Bible is NOT the inerrant Word of God, you might have some ground to stand on, but you cannot spin the Bible into being neutral or pro homosexuality. It is against the natural order.

    That does NOT, however, give Christians or anyone else a license to hate homosexuals. That is wrong too. The homosexual lifestyle is a sin, but there are a lot of sins. We all have vices, and it is God’s place to judge, not ours.

25. YeahRight
    February 20th, 2008 | 16:09

    I love how the word “documentary” has come to mean “mindless exercise in conformal bias”.

    Someone should do a documentary on that.

26. dreamer
    February 20th, 2008 | 16:21

    I would want to put a bible on the pillow on my bed. Then, go to the street and get some random prostitute to come home with me. Then i would have sex with her, from behind while she would be face down on the bible.

    It would be a truly joyful sight.

27. Vasilios
    February 20th, 2008 | 16:29

    Ksawery thanx a lot

28. f-a-g-g-o-t
    February 20th, 2008 | 16:32

    i’m not hetero.

29. -Z.M.
    February 20th, 2008 | 16:37

    Load of shiiiitt!

    Religion is about love, and give people hope.

    If it turns into a excuse for personal hate/violence, then somethings gone wrong.

    To hate love is waste of time. I rather hate a murderer, someone who rapes your kids at nights.
    Then someone who wants to be loved by the same sex.

    Think about what you hate before you hate it.

    “What you give is what you get, that’s a fact, look on how you act!”

    Usa got some crazy christian types over there, hope not everyone of you are brainwashed.

30. USA
    February 20th, 2008 | 16:43

    Yes, we are all brainwashed.

31. Aint a homo
    February 20th, 2008 | 16:52

    Can it be right for a hairy arsed men to stick it in another guys arse

32. suck on my bible
    February 20th, 2008 | 16:58

    suck on my bible. OOOOOOOH suck on it. Just suck on it you sinner. Suck my bible, b***h!

33. sopranos are ghey
    February 20th, 2008 | 17:00

    no. neither is it right for a hairy arsed men to stick it in womans genitalia.

34. yo
    February 20th, 2008 | 17:23

    big up rlslog for including this docu

    oh and hate = hate no matter what the justification, be it a 2,000 year-old piece of scribblings or someone’s own personal bigotry

35. i love it.
    February 20th, 2008 | 17:41

    33% is great for hours and hours.

36. SkuNk
    February 20th, 2008 | 17:52

    You all need to go back and give the bible a good looking over if you think its about love. I wouldn’t call the chapter on the proper way to sell your daughter into slavery ..love. @26 why would you say we’re all sinners, I’m not a sinner and no homophobic god laying around in the clouds deserves my worship for being lazy and impotent. The Bible has been interpreted in so many ways, not only by people opposed to it but by the church itself just look at the number of people killed in the name of christianity its a f’ing bloodbath. Seriously people get an education and know what you’re defending. Btw anyone who has talked back to their parents which i know all you sad nerds do everyday the christians will be by later to stone you to death right after they kill everyone that worked last sunday. Get a clue religion is at the heart of the “war on terror” aka Christianity v. Islam and by defending either sides right to believe in their false dogma you’re only enabling them to continue the violence.

37. A scientologist
    February 20th, 2008 | 18:32

    I remember reading the bible once, a long time ago. Whoever wrote it was obviously high, and as a piece of fantasy goes it was not very good.

    And I seem to remeber a bit where the main character, jesus, kissed another man and not the hot woman he was spending time with.

    Thank you to whoever posted the links, can’t remember what your name was and not bothered enough to scroll up.

38. Dorje
    February 20th, 2008 | 18:43

    I thought Jesus and Lazarus were super-buddies.

39. Toni
    February 20th, 2008 | 18:43

    All I can say is: http://www.freethinkingteens.com/files/images/MAGIC.jpg

40. Dorje
    February 20th, 2008 | 18:59

    The earth is flat, the center of the universe and not a day over 6000 years old. Science and medicine are the devil’s work…Darwin is proof of that. Women are pure evil and the cause of all our problems. (well 2 out 3 ain’t bad lol)

    The medieval mindset just doesn’t stand up to modern analysis unless you get your head so far up your @ss you lose conciousness. But I’ve noticed some christian fundies are able, i guess through special psychic magical training, to perform this act while blathering on and on in an ectacsy of verbal diahrreah.

41. Aries-Belgium
    February 20th, 2008 | 19:02

    Quote from Friends:
    Ross: Oh no, the pages are stuck together.
    Joey: Chandler!

    @44: Hahaha, great one!

42. Harl
    February 20th, 2008 | 19:38

    Religion is for people too weak and insecure to face reality. I’d sooner believe in Santa Clause than the bible. There’s more evidence.

43. Estebon
    February 20th, 2008 | 19:38

    You have to admit there is something highly erotic about the male body. Seeing a naked, in-shape man, with large, tight chest muscles, and ripped cut, abs will get you turned on immediately.

    And then once you see his hard package, fully aroused and ready to go, its its enough to get you off just by looking at him.

44. Ben
    February 20th, 2008 | 19:44

    Most of the guys I know have had some sort of same-sex experience during their life.

    Whether it was one drunk night during high school, or the first time at summer camp, or a little experimenting in a darkened bedroom, most guys have been there and done that. It was fun at the time, and sometimes, as we all know, a mouth is still a mouth, whether it is a guy or girl doing the work on us.

    God and the bible aren’t striking us all down, even though some people think they should.

45. iheartliberals
    February 20th, 2008 | 19:52

    People who believe in the Old Testament have been seriously duped. Moses did NOT part the red sea. Woman was NOT made with the rib of a man. There was NOT a 600 year old man who sailed a giant boat with every single living creature aboard during an impossible flood. Freaking wake up people you all need to take responsibility for your own actions. Worshiping the Bible is akin to me worshiping the Lord of the Rings. What’s the difference? They are both fantasy. Um yeah in Chapter 3 paragraph two Frodo says to Sam, thou shalt not eat the farmer’s bounty. I mean cmon where are people’s brains. There may very well be a God but the Bible is a freaking story and people who quote it as gospel have been brainwashed.

46. extra happy
    February 20th, 2008 | 19:57

    @Ben

    Have to agree…sometimes in the dark, you might no be sure who’s mouth is on your tool, but it just feels good so you let them keep going at it until completion.

    Actually guys seem to knoww how to do that better than girls anyway, so might as well enjoy it.

47. []D[][]V[][]D
    February 20th, 2008 | 20:02

    http://zeitgeistmovie.com/

    http://sector.yweb.sk/Zeitgeist.Remastered.Edition.2007.DVDRip.XviD.torrent

    best docu ever just look past the weird intro music/war images at the start, the show really can teach ya something. its in 3 parts
    part 1 is about “the bible”\
    part 2 is about “false flags”
    part 3 is about how they fit together

48. Fifty Cents
    February 20th, 2008 | 20:06

    @[]D[][]V[][]D

    Yo man, you are kidding us.

    That movie is about whacky conspiracy theories I tried to watch it once, but once it started saying that the government was responsible for the aliens at Area 51, and for bringing down the WTC, I knew the whole movie was based on sound bites and perverted news clips.

    It was funny though, I’ll give you that. Sorta like reading the National Enquirer or the Weekly World News.

49. Pastrymarx
    February 20th, 2008 | 20:07

    I’ll take a stand and state that which is incontrovertible (sorry for the big word for some of you). The laughter I enjoy reading some of these posts when there is a controversial subject.
    Who really cares what two or more consenting adults do behind closed doors. Furthermore, if some god is upset with what consenting adults do behind closed doors, then let that god deal with it. What happen to free will? What happen to living in a free society?
    I hope the movie is half as entertaining as some of these posts.
    @ 44 Toni, well put.

50. WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH
    February 20th, 2008 | 20:09

    We rule. We got the coolest signs and all.

51. gus
    February 20th, 2008 | 20:14

    @Ben

    I agree with you.

    It is a known fact that if you can get a guy to suck you off, you will like it better than having a girl do it. I spent many summers at an all-boys camp, and believe me, we had a few guys that would “take care” of us if you know what I mean.

    If its dark and you don’t know whose mouth it is, you will never know the difference.

52. Lasher
    February 20th, 2008 | 20:28

    christianity is nothing but a poor exscuse for weak-minded people to give some greater meaning to their life, and a possible escape from death.

    the only thing seperating christianity from cults such as 11 and builderberg is, christianity promote forgiveness, cults promote self sacrifice.

    christianity does not belong in our world, since humanity simply can’t forgive transgressions the way the bible dictates it.

    our world isn’t ready for religon, it’s just another exscuse to kill, start wars, throughout humanity christians or some other form of religon has been at ground zero for every serious act of evil or cruelty.

    perhaps when humanity actually DESERVE to believe in a religon, we might also deserve a religon that is true, proven both by faith and science, that will help us all.

    but untill wogs stop using pages in the karan to suicide bomb busses of kids, or us limeys and frogs back in the early centuries wiping out millions of muslims during the “holy” crusades.

53. Billy
    February 20th, 2008 | 20:38

    @Lasher

    Totally agree with you, except for the part about Christianity. The limeys and frogs may have wiped out millions of muslims a thousand years ago during the crusades, but that was back when people didn’t know as much as we know today.

    You would think thse crazy wogs today would stop using the koran to suicide bomb a bus full of children, gut it seems like muslims have made no progress for 1,000 years of human eveloution.

    So Islam is the religion the world does not need today. Christianity can remain.

54. Reality
    February 20th, 2008 | 20:58

    Islam is the main problem of the religion. Just wait till you cant buy a pint of beer and go to beach without covering everything with burkas. All the things you have now in Western Society are made by Protestant Christianity traditions. Compare society which was made up by Christians(WEST) and Compare the sh*thole Middle East and all the other muslim countries. There wont be Atheist countries, people are too easly manipulated into believing something. If it wont be Christianity it will be Islam. DECIDE WHICH ONE YOU WANT!

55. Dorje
    February 20th, 2008 | 20:59

    Hey, this doc/thread mixes religion and homosexuality just like the Catholic Church.

    - ReliJizz : )

56. bitna
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:04

    @Dorje

    How does the Catholic Church mix religion with homosexuality?

57. new links plz!
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:04

    N_e_w _ R_a_p_i_d_s_h_a_r_e _ l_i_n_k_s _ p_l_s_!_!_!

    rapidshare.com
    http://rs-layer.com/directory-8194-8hc63esb.html
    is down!

    I think religion isn’t bad, it gets bad when people start thinking they have to convince others of their own believe…

58. Dorje
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:04

    @60

    Hmmmmm, I wan’t neither. Is there really only two choices?

59. well,
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:05

    Excuse me pleeeze,

    what is the difference between adultery and fornication?

    Or is there no difference?

    @17 Pandalemon (a lemon for Panda bears? or ist that greek?)
    quotes [is that an authentic quote? From what bible edition (which translation?)]:
    “1 Corinthians 6:9-10 – “…neither fornicators nor idolaters nor adulterers nor boy prostitutes nor sodomites…will inherit the kingdom of God.””

    So what is the difference?

60. new links plz!
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:05

    N_e_w _ R_a_p_i_d_s_h_a_r_e _ l_i_n_k_s _ p_l_s_!_!_!

    http://rs-layer.com/directory-8194-8hc63esb.html
    is down!

    I think religion isn’t bad, it gets bad when people start thinking they have to convince others of their own believe…

61. Larry
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:10

    @well,

    C’mon, everyone knows what the difference is between those two. You are just trying to get a rise out of people.

    Fornication is sex between two unmarried people, while adultery is sex between two people, one or both of whom may be married to others.

62. Vivian
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:18

    @gus

    Most women would disagree with you. Woman are much better at performing oral sex on a man than another man is. Just because a man has the same equipment doesn’t mean he is automatically better at it.

    We do it much more often to men, and because of that, have much more experience. We know all of the little twists and tricks to do that will get a guy off quicker and I’ll bet that many more woman will swallow a mans load than other men will.

    You should not be so quick to judge.

63. DuBlin
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:19

    @50 -Ben
    WHAT! NOOOOOO. “most guys”. . …..most guys!?
    Most guys i know stick to ‘experiencing’ women and not ‘experimenting’ with other men.

    Also id like to add that all this talk about ’sin’ is as big a laugh as the people calling the bible a work of fiction.
    to all you sheeple: read learn and experience, attain some knowledge and wisdom maybe even some gnosis before you sh1t on a whole history of spirituality throughout the world.

64. gus
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:23

    @Vivian

    You can yap all you want, but like most women, it sounds like you’re making it up.

    Besides, I just don’t trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn’t die.

65. well,
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:26

    Ok, I see. (results edited from http://www.etymonline.com)

    adultery:
    “voluntary violation of the marriage bed,” c.1300, avoutrie, from O.Fr. avoutrie, aoulterie, from L. adulterare “to corrupt”. Classified as single adultery (a married person with an unmarried person) and double adultery (two married persons).

    fornication:
    Strictly, “voluntary sex between an unmarried man and an unmarried woman;” extended in the Bible to adultery.
    from L. fornix (gen. fornicis) “brothel,” originally “arch, vaulted chamber” (Roman prostitutes commonly solicited from under the arches of certain buildings)

    I did wrongly assume that fornication did also relate to ‘breach of the marriage’.

    Though I don’t understand part of the following sentence (from the dictionary entry on ‘fornication’):
    “Strictly, ‘voluntary sex between an unmarried man and an unmarried woman;’ extended in the Bible to adultery.”

    What is meant with “…extended in the Bible to adultery.”?

    Does that mean that the bible drops the distinction between fornication and adultery? So that in the bible both words have the same meaning?

    Confused,
    Luftwaffe Automotive

66. well,
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:34

    @67 Larry:

    Thank you for answering. And no, I wasn’t “trying to get a rise out of people”. That was a honest question of mine.

    Thanks, and a bouquet of flowers to rlslog.net!

67. well,
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:35

    btw: I am not a native speaker of english.

68. Larry
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:35

    @well,

    I can’t find anything that says “…extended in the Bible to adultery”. Go here and read all about both and you will see that one is different from the other:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fornication
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adultery

69. Dorje
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:40

    hmmmm can’t post

70. gus
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:41

    @DuBlin

    Were you receptive any possible experimentation with another young man when you were a teen? If not, you may have had a chance, but turned it down.

    Those are the types of situations where many young men begin to experiment with certain acts, and some may continue to enjoy them without making it public knowledge.

71. Dorje
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:46

    ffs

72. yuri
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:51

    @Dorje

    Your posts are showing up.

73. Dorje
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:55

    censored on RLS??? not the first time : (

    Somebody has a christian thumb up their @ss

    I’m on topic and using no profanity whatsoever (above notwithstanding lol)

74. Dorje
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:58

    Thanks Yuri,

    Looks like some and SOME ARE NOT

75. Dorje
    February 20th, 2008 | 21:58

    Some *are

76. Larry
    February 20th, 2008 | 22:00

    @gus

    So when one guy sucks off another guy, are both considered to be homosexually oriented or is it just the sucker? Because this happens in prison, and those guys are not homosexually oriented, they are just making the best of a lousy situation.

77. yuri
    February 20th, 2008 | 22:02

    @Dorje

    Which ones are not showing up?

78. Jonathan
    February 20th, 2008 | 22:10

    Well, I for one am comfortable enough in my sexuality to understand that a free blow job from a guy is better than jerking myself off anytime.

79. vince
    February 20th, 2008 | 23:16

    ADrive?

80. Ricardo Montalban
    February 20th, 2008 | 23:24

    @Larry

    “So when one guy sucks off another guy, are both considered to be homosexually oriented or is it just the sucker?”

    Just the “sucker” is, the “suckee” is simply having a good time.

81. Pete
    February 20th, 2008 | 23:37

    I don’t agree with all of the banging in the ass stuff, but I don’t think a little hand relief or even some oral from a guy is much of a big deal.

82. H
    February 20th, 2008 | 23:43

    Leviticus has tonnes of crazy rules and anyway the bible is a bunch of crap that is way out of date.

83. pw
    February 20th, 2008 | 23:44

    “If its dark and you don’t know whose mouth it is, you will never know the difference.”

    ..apart from the stubble scratching your plums.

84. DuBlin
    February 20th, 2008 | 23:50

    @gus (76)
    My sexual desires are not so great as to allow them to influence my choice. This goes for men and women alike.

    Sexual pleasure for me in coupled with love and intimacy. Turning off the lights and allowing whomever or whichever gender do as they will with my body is not my idea of love/intimacy or even pleasure for that matter regardless of which guise you place on it, IE experimenting.

    Its not a f*cking experiment ffs.
    There is no shortage of women in this world and i need not include the WHOLE human race as a potential means of arousal when (about)half of them are here to do so.(women)
    I’m getting off topic though because what this film is about is homosexuality not teenage experiments but if a teenage experiment gives way to a life of homosexuality i see that as a point of weakness not some sort of exploration or ‘experiment’

    Example: Some teen boy desires orgasm so bad he isn’t willing to put in the work to capture a girls reciprocating desires instead he chooses a sympathetic male friend to satisfy his uncontrolled desires and thats what your really talking about is an uncontrolled desire to be sexually aroused not discipline and patience to achieve arousal with his fellow teen girls NOT EVEN the fortitude to arouse himself until he successfully courts a woman for such fulfillment. Now if this boy only ever desired homosexual arousal then again this isn’t an experiment at all its a preference.

    These ‘experiments’ don’t take any real effort just blind courage(and apparently darkness) and the euphoric physiological sensations that follow will do that rest, creating new neural and psychological patterns allowing what was once questionable to now be acceptable via addiction. These new patterns would be identical given the boy was aroused by a girl, as you’ll find with most men once they get a taste of the flower they are hooked.

    Lets face it, most humans are sexual addicts in some form or another but that does not validify a whomever whenever whatever because it feels good mentality, thats just promiscuity. And if you are so promiscuous as to allow a like-gendered human to do what the opposite sex was born to desire than you aren’t even homosexual your just a sex junkie.
    Im no homophob but i disagree with this ‘experiment’ bull.

    Experiment:
    “a series of actions carried out to test a theory, demonstrate a fact or find out what happens”
    “A method of research which permits the inference of cause and effect.”

    Cause of sexual desire: human nature
    Effect of fulfilling such desire: pleasure
    WHERE is the question in that? one doesn’t need to ‘find out what happens’ one knows what happens.

    I guess what im trying to say is that you can CHOOSE your source of fulfillment. and more importantly you can CHOOSE your desires.
    The world would be a better place if we all kept our desires in check, free will wasn’t granted so that we can experiment on everything, look around at what people/corporations/government/etc are ‘EXPERIMENTING’ with and where its gotten us.
    “PURE experience is PURE”
    -my 2 cents thanks gus

85. LazyLuni
    February 20th, 2008 | 23:55

    @17 (i’m a bit late but whatevs)
    ok.. right the laws of Leviticus.. great stuff really is
    literually gives mankind the right to murder homosexuals
    Leviticus 20:13 – If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

    however, that book has lots more to say
    for example
    leviticus 20:9 – here is states that if you are cruel to ur parents u must be killed… wow i’m a dead man
    Leviticus 19:19 – states you shouldn’t wear cloths made of more than one fabric.
    Leviticus 21:17-18 – here is a lovely one, if you have a fat nose, are blind, or lame.. u can’t go to heaven
    Leviticus 19:27 – don’t cut your hair or shave…. hmm..

    lifes not looking to good for me according to this…
    at least i’m not a homosexual tho…

86. maybelline
    February 21st, 2008 | 00:07

    @DuBlin

    But how would you know which gender to choose to have those pleasurable moments with unless you experiment?

    It seems as though you choose to only experience sexual pleasure with females, but when did you first choose to enjoy a woman over a man?

87. extra happy
    February 21st, 2008 | 00:17

    @LazyLuni

    “leviticus 20:9 – here is states that if you are cruel to ur parents u must be killed”

    This is not so bad, as today you can’t even smack your kid without looking over your shoulder to see if someone is calling CPS.

    “Leviticus 19:19 – states you shouldn’t wear cloths made of more than one fabric.”

    This is another good one, have you ever worn a shirt made of a cotton/poly blend? They are horrible against the skin.

    “Leviticus 21:17-18 – here is a lovely one, if you have a fat nose, are blind, or lame.. u can’t go to heaven”

    This is to get the point across about the jews not going to heaven. Instead of saying jews, they just went with the “large nose” euphemism.

    “Leviticus 19:27 – don’t cut your hair or shave…. ”

    This is for health reasons. At the time of these writings, the state of both scissors and razors were terrible. The edges were hard to keep sharp and many people were injured during hair cutting and shaving procedures. Hence, the directive not to do either.

88. DuBlin
    February 21st, 2008 | 00:34

    @95
    I’ll respond sort of jokingly to your question….

    Look at all other life on the planet(male goes with female) theres a pattern, i fall into that pattern, its designed that way(for now), no experimentation needed.
    If male dogs stop f*cking b1tches then there would be no dogs right. If turkeys start f*cking male turkeys…we’d all be eating foturkey
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/04/Stuffed_Holiday_Roast_AuraPro_Turkey_flavor.jpg/800px-Stuffed_Holiday_Roast_AuraPro_Turkey_flavor.jpg

    FFS is male humans stop f*cking female humans then there is no consciousness left on this planet to even be disgusted by the idea of fake turkey dinners.

    I did and still do choose females for pleasure but experimentation has allowed humans to go so far as having sex with dead animals, with trees and plants, with plastic toys and dolls.

    So while I’ve never experimented with necrophilia nor bestiality nor plastic pussies i bet its pleasurable physiologically. again no experiment needed.

    As an interesting side note, men fulfill certain desires for other men in less taboo ways, take basketball for example, you sure can fulfill your basketball playing desires with a woman but look where its gotten us…the WNBA. (joking)

89. Ralphie
    February 21st, 2008 | 00:41

    @ #95

    What DuBlin is trying to say is that both heterosexual and homosexual people are born knowing which gender they should have sex with, and that it is not a “choice” at all.

    There may be times during what you call “experiments” where a heterosexual person may choose a same-sex encounter or where a homosexual person may choose an opposite-sex encounter. And while those may be fun and enjoyable, they don’t happen all the time.

90. DuBlin
    February 21st, 2008 | 00:43

    The funny thing about all this Leviticus quoting is that according to the Christian faith it(The Old Testament Law) has no relevance after the coming of Christ who ushered in a new law.
    People really don’t understand the Bible much at all its sad really, most of yall just quote it, never read it, never knew where it came from, never even bothered to hold one.

    Jesus spoke in parables for a reason, because all you spiritual children cant understand it otherwise. The book is full of mystery and code you really have to read into it to understand it. the bibles they have these days just take the orthodox traditions and translate them into modern day speech even.
    Try reading coptic/greek/hebrew etc the words that are written are entirely different from todays bibles, most of yall just don’t want to take the time to judge that set of information which is legitimate all you want to do is mock the modern translations and rightfully so, its been completely f*cked with and manipulated to keep the masses in the dark about spiritual evolution and the promise of enlightenment.

91. []D[][]V[][]D
    February 21st, 2008 | 00:57

    http://zeitgeistmovie.com/

    http://sector.yweb.sk/Zeitgeist.Remastered.Edition.2007.DVDRip.XviD.torrent

    best docu ever just look past the weird intro music/war images at the start, the show really can teach ya something. its in 3 parts
    part 1 is about “the bible”\
    part 2 is about “false flags”
    part 3 is about how they fit together

    CHECK THE SITE. ITS ALL TRUE!! CHECK THE SITE THEY EVEN CORRECT ANY MISTAKES ON THE SITE WITH MOVIE TIME STAMPS WITH THE UPDATED INFO

92. Archie
    February 21st, 2008 | 01:01

    @[]D[][]V[][]D

    I was very disappointed in the producers of this piece, and I can understand why it went directly to DVD and was not released in any theaters.

    I tried to watch this movie, but then I found out there was no really research done for it, and it was just a bunch of video clips edited together to try and prove some false ideas.

    Fortunately, since it lost money for everyone involved, we won’t have to sit through a boring sequal.

93. []D[][]V[][]D
    February 21st, 2008 | 01:08

    THE FINAL PART IT TOTALLY TRUE. ITS NOT ABOUT 911 ITS ABOUT ALL THE REAL FALSE FLAGS WITH 911 BEING ONE OF THEM! JUSUS IS REALLY COULD BE JUST ANOTHER SUN GOD. THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS A SCAM. JUST WATCH IT THRU

94. []D[][]V[][]D
    February 21st, 2008 | 01:10

    REPOST FOR PAGE 2
    http://zeitgeistmovie.com/

    http://sector.yweb.sk/Zeitgeist.Remastered.Edition.2007.DVDRip.XviD.torrent

    best docu ever just look past the weird intro music/war images at the start, the show really can teach ya something. its in 3 parts
    part 1 is about “the bible”\
    part 2 is about “false flags”
    part 3 is about how they fit together

95. Henry
    February 21st, 2008 | 01:16

    @[]D[][]V[][]D

    Just a few of the lies…er, corrections in Zeitgeist:

    The narration states regarding W.Wilson and the Federal Reserve Act:
    “Years Later Woodrow Wilson wrote in regret…”
    - The notion of “years later” is incorrect. The quote is taken from his book
    “The New Freedom” and it was written the same year he signed the Federal Reserve Act.

    53:56-53:59
    The text reads:
    ["Collapse Characteristics of World T. Center 1, 2 & 7 fit the Controlled Demolition Model Exactly"]
    -WTC 7 fits the C.D. model exactly, however Towers 1 and 2 were, in fact, EXPLOSIONS rather than implosions. That means of the demolition of Towers 1 and 2 would be considered unconventional. The free fall speed; collapse “into its own footprint” and other such goals of controlled demolition, are however confluent.

    1:23:35 -1:23:38
    There are 2 errors stated in the narration, one computational, the other technical.
    It should say: “Roughly 25% of the average worker’s income is taken via this tax”

    This 25% is not a flat tax against the entire income of that single person for the year.
    Rather, the tax is “graduated”. In other words, it is a generalization to say “25% is taxed”, where as there are 2 tax rate brackets under this one, and income is taxed based on each bracket combined, in a graduated manner. Consequently, the statement “you work 3 months out of the year…” is not accurate as it would be less than that in light of the “graduated” nature.

    1:27.35-1:27:40:
    There is a statement error in the narration. It should say: -”J.D. Rockefeller made 200 million dollars off of it [WWI]. That’s about 1.9 Billion by today’s standards”
    [It was stated as "1.9 Trillion", which was misspoken and intended to have been read "Billion", not "Trillion".
    Note: Based on the Consumer Price Index (not the GDP used initially), this conversion can also be figured
    at about 3 Billion dollars]

96. []D[][]V[][]D
    February 21st, 2008 | 01:27

    YEP

97. []D[][]V[][]D
    February 21st, 2008 | 01:32

    yes the site is self updated and lists sources. its no 911 bs video
    watch it b4 try and slam it. better yet check the source page.

98. Henry
    February 21st, 2008 | 01:38

    The site may be self updated, but these lies are all in the film.

    Which is NOT self-updated.

99. []D[][]V[][]D
    February 21st, 2008 | 01:50

    not lies mistakes. choose not to belive but my eyes are open, let others decide henry.

100. monugs
     February 21st, 2008 | 02:02

     rapidshare links anyone???

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a reply