Releaselog

Day of the Dead DVDSCR XviD-ARROW

Recently released Day of the Dead DVDSCR by ARROW is yet another zombie film, albeit a DVDSCR. The film is outrageously poorly recieved 4.1 at with 127 votes. If you’re willing to watch this film, you could be risking some wasted time from your life. Read the imdb review for more details. Some comments have specified that this film has no relation to the other Day of The Dead. And btw, their nfo does really suck. Someone else can post samples in the comments.

When the world is overrun by the flesh hungry dead a small group of survivors head to an underground military bunker in a last ditch effort to stay alive.

Day.of.the.Dead.DVDSCR.XviD-ARROW
608×320 – AC3 2ch – 700MB
Search TorrentNFOSamplesimdb

Comments (137)

Feel free to post your Day of the Dead DVDSCR XviD-ARROW torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. February 11th, 2008 | 00:09
  2. Jim
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:12

    How do these films make money? I honestly don’t understand their appeal to audiences, or anyone really.

  3. Mr.Monocle the Chimp
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:12

    This is a bad remake guys, get the original one from Romero, it’s much better.

  4. Erm
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:14

    /downloading

  5. ajua
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:14

    i saw some jpg samples and there seems to be big property marks on this release

  6. chrismg84
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:22

    @2 There is a huge Zombie movie fanbase, they are my among my favorite type of movie. Im gonna check this one out just as i did the poorly rated “Zombie Wars” not to long ago.

    I hope these zombies are the fast moving savage ones.

  7. dluppers
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:22
  8. goob
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:26

    trailer doesn’t look that bad. But it does have Nick Cannon in it….but i’m a zombie fan so I’ll check it out, I’m sure I’ve watched worse :)

  9. Lee Welton
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:28

    Another screener not named There Will Be Blood. Makes me think that somebody is holding the goods and not sharing.

  10. SuperFundo
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:28

    Esta película aspira.

  11. brOWN
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:32

    trailer looks amusing,

  12. Lee Welton
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:32

    I was interested until I found out Nick Cannon is “starring” in this pile of wank. Vomit.

  13. xyztynz
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:33

    Thanks for the heads up on this awesome release! Awesome looking movie dudes!

  14. IzaHova
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:34
  15. chrismg84
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:34

    This DVDSCR probably leaked because it is under review for an Oscar.

  16. IzaHova
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:34

    TPB Link ^^^^^^^^^^

  17. ReQuiM
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:35

    @3
    This one is related as a direct remake of Day of the Dead as was Dawn of the Dead was to the original.
    It is not a 3rd party crap movie like a VOMiT release. Was co-written by George A. Romero. Stars actors from Dawn of the Dead like Ving Rhames.
    Whether or not it’s good… that’s another story.

  18. Inevitable
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:36

    “you could be risking some wasted time from your life”

    LOL!

    Thanks Mr.X

  19. night
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:38

    i think this movie was spose to come out so long ago like 6 moths a year. but i think thay just shelved the movie for a latter reasles date or to co inside with direa of the dead.. most likey will go straite to video. im still a fan of all zombie movies. try going to fanedit.org there a realy great recut of dawn of the dead there.

  20. hey
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:39

    anyone got nzb links?

  21. The Original Geek
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:52

    “How do these films make money? I honestly don’t understand their appeal to audiences, or anyone really.”

    HUGE moneymakers even with all the piracy. If you don’t understand the appeal of flesh eating monsters that used to be human you’re either a homo or a sad Dungeons and Dragons playing nerd. Fear and horror’s appeal is visceral and they tap into an old primal part of the human condition.

  22. kindbuddy
    February 11th, 2008 | 00:55

    lmao @ 18 … and good one for 24 haha…. im goin to watch this whether bad or good reviews… dont care

  23. Rog
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:00

    Thank you for posting the trailer MR. X . It looks like a comedy of every Zombie Cliché known it does seem funny and seeing Ving Rhames kick zombie ass is always good. Does anybody know if the Watermark stays on or is it once in a while?
    http://www.vcdquality.com/index.php?page=sample&id=75359

  24. Meyer
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:04

    Is this a satire like Meet the Spartans?

  25. KoOlWaReZ
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:06
  26. Elephant
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:15

    @Meyer

    No, it is more like a comedic takeoff of a movie, similar to Epic Movie.

  27. something else...
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:18
  28. alk
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:20

    love zombie movies, espically dawn of the dead, land of the day, day of the dead looks good.

    and they already got a day of the dead 2 that came out in 2oo5

  29. Vincent Chase
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:26

    Looks good, I’ll give it a try…Tito I hope you grace this thread with adrive or yastorage links please!

  30. Seneedra
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:27
  31. Albert
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:31

    Anyone have a Joox link for this yet?

    Thanx in advance.

  32. scott
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:37

    No7 ! Zombies don’t move very fast as they are dead and they definitely don’t run! romero’s style is the gospel as far as how they act, anything you want to know about zombies is contained in the original Night of the Living Dead. Any remakes are 2nd rate.

  33. alk
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:37

    just seen the pics off of vcdquality for this movie, gots the property logo, ontop and on the bottom, and there pretty big size, any one know how long they last on it?

  34. kindbuddy
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:39

    @ 35 dawn of the dead was one of the best horror remakes ever though… it would be a diss to call it 2nd rate…

  35. rich gannon
    February 11th, 2008 | 01:51

    @36

    if you watch the sample you’ll see the water mark comes in and out, seems to me like they throw it up there durin the action scenes. the sample was about a minute 15 long, the watermark came up as soon as some broad got attacked and it last maybe 20 seconds then went away…but i have no idea how many times it pops up.

  36. eb
    February 11th, 2008 | 02:09

    watermark is on screen for 20 seconds about 5 times in total during the whole film.
    Whilst the 2004 remake of Dawn of the dead was pretty cool, this remake is utterly abysmal.
    As a zombie film in its own right – 6 out of 10
    As a retelling of Day of the dead – 0 out of 10

  37. Rog
    February 11th, 2008 | 02:14

    Any FlyUpload links?

  38. henderson
    February 11th, 2008 | 02:27

    Dawn Of The Dead remake was pants – anyone who disagrees knows nothing about zombies

    it’s scientifically proven for example that zombies can’t run, or ‘think’, or ‘be led’

    HOWEVER, even the worst zombie movie is always better than a good vampire movie…!

  39. Loonik
    February 11th, 2008 | 02:27

    I was not going to post a comment, but then i realized that if i dont then no one will post any megaupload links; so please, someone post megaupload links. Megaupload is way better than rapidshare, at least i think so. And at 9:00 pm eastern time, anyone with a megaupload account, whic is free, can experience premium features. They call it “happy hour,” which extends from 9:00pm to 3:00am eastern time.

    Megaupload links, please.

  40. Blah
    February 11th, 2008 | 02:32

    Rapidshare is so damn slow now… someone please upload megaupload or flyupload.

  41. Bob
    February 11th, 2008 | 02:52

    hopefully the movie is good…im a real fan of Zombie movies.

    It’s a shame that the screener messages are so large…don’t mind the fact that they are there but just that their so large and take up a lot of the screen. Anyways im torrenting it now..so ill see what its like and report back

  42. Large Elephant
    February 11th, 2008 | 02:54

    @Bob

    You aren’t torrenting it, you are leeching it.

  43. Beaulieu
    February 11th, 2008 | 02:59

    It’s the kind of movie you bring your date to if you know what I mean. KKKCCCCCHHHIINNNGGG!!

  44. gamertag: riise343
    February 11th, 2008 | 02:59

    it’s scientifically proven for example that zombies can’t run, or ‘think’, or ‘be led’

    Exactly how did they study them?

  45. Beaulieu
    February 11th, 2008 | 02:59

    @2
    It’s the kind of movie you bring your date to if you know what I mean. KKKCCCCCHHHIINNNGGG!!

  46. Totalbalance
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:01

    Looking forward to this one. I just hate double casting.
    Ving Rhames Day of the Dead (2008) (V) …. Captain Rhodes
    Ving Rhames Dawn of the Dead (2004) …. Kenneth

  47. dan
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:06

    OMG PLEASE!!! Not another one! First you had the original NOTLD, and that scared the pants off people and remains one of Horror’s all time greats. Then they made DOTD, and while this was not too bad, it was far below the original. Then they came up with DayOTD and this was just about the most worthless hunk of crap ever made. And after watching LOTD, Romero has lost it! maybe he just ran out of ideas, I dont know.

    Then they made the NOTLD extended version/and the 20th Anniversary version and then the color version. (can you say ‘milking this?’) Then they made the remake of NOTLD with Tony Todd and one of the hottest looking redheads ever, and that was not that bad. Then they remade Dawn of the Living dead with Ving (wonder how he got the name Ving..) and that was not bad and actually had two of the coolest scenes (when that little kid hopped from the floor to her feet and growled then came running down the hall spooked the crap out of me)and the scene with the zombie baby (that was wrong on so many levels, lol) Now they come up with this turd of a movie?

    I can only hope with the upcoming “Dead World/World of the Dead” that Romero is making and swears will be like the NOTLD original, can salvage his rep. I mean you can only make so many screw ups before your past glory wont be worth squat!

  48. Bob
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:08

    @45 ok then my mistake…..guess i know who to count on from now on to correct my errors

  49. extra happy
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:09

    @dan

    i know what OMG stands for, but what does NOTLD and LOTD stand for?

  50. Bob
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:10

    I think its Night of the Living Dead and Land of the Dead…but I could be mistaken

  51. extra happy
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:14

    @Bob

    Please don’t take offense at this, but considering that the post right before mine was of someone correcting you, I’d like to hear from a source with a better track record than yours.

  52. david
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:15

    so is no good to download because it has watermark

  53. Marlboro
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:17

    @david

    thanks for the warning, i was just about to download this too.

  54. Bob
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:27

    @54 not taking any offense…but I’m not quite sure what your getting at? the post previous to the one you just wrote was me answering a question…not correcting anyone, you asked what those letter stood for and I told you….in no way was I correcting anyone

    so could you better explain to me what you mean?

  55. extra happy
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:31

    @Bob

    I was referring to your post #51 where you acknowledge your previous error which was corrected in comment #45.

  56. TrolleyGuy
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:37

    NOTD = Night Of The Living Dead, LOTD = Land of the Dead.

    It’s doesn’t work with DOTD as there was Dawn and Day.

  57. Bob
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:38

    wow…i make a grammatical error and suddenly my help is worth jack all…hmmmmm you know a “thanks for the help” would have been a lot more acceptable than being rude and writing that little comment of yours…I’ll remember next time to no longer assist people with their questions because of my track record.

    anyways really no point in continuing on…lets just leave it where it is

  58. extra happy
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:40

    @TrolleyGuy

    Thanks so much for the reliable information

    @Bob

    I certainly didn’t mean to offend, and if, in the future, it turns out you can be relied upon for information, I may once again reach out to you.

  59. Bob
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:42

    good to hear

  60. denta
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:45

    is this the new version 2008 or the old one

  61. edbighead
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:55

    i’ve never been sooooo happy in my life …………YaaaaaaaaaaY

  62. dan
    February 11th, 2008 | 04:15

    extra happy
    February 11th, 2008 | 03:09
    @dan

    i know what OMG stands for, but what does NOTLD and LOTD stand for?
    —————
    What the others told you is correct and I should have written it out but I am so used to phrasing it this way like they do in the horror magazines and boards that I forgot that maybe not everyone would know what I was speaking of. For that you have my apologies.

    NOTLD= Night of the Living Dead. The original Zombie movie and the grandfather of all Zombie movies worth spit. Before Romero came along, all these did was shuffel and choke you or rip you to small parts. After Romero, they started to eat you and change you into one of them…your brain knows what you have become and is unable to stop it and you are now trapped in a living hell that will never end until someone destroys your brain.

    DOTD= Dawn of the Dead. The second in the original zombie horror trilogy.

    DayOTD=Day of the Dead. The Third of the original trilogy and there for the longest time, the final movie.

    LOTD=Land of the Dead. The changing of the ideal where Romero decided to show what it would look like (according to him) when flesh eating Zombies had taken over most of the world.

    WOTD/DW=World of the Dead or Dead World. This is suppose to be the final movie in this series according to Romero. This takes place over 20 years after the Zombies destroyed civilization. The premis of the movie is that these people try to make sure that the virus that started it all and has showed signs of evolving and getting ready to “jump species” (means start infecting other species besides humanity, like dogs-cats-etc) does not jump species while fighting to stay alive against the zombies and restart human civilization, all the while trying not to destroy each other.

    lets hope this final movie is better then the others and that no more remakes are made. With the way Romero chain smokes, I dont think his lungs are gonna hold out for much longer.

  63. Peter
    February 11th, 2008 | 04:35

    You forgot about Diary Of The Dead.

  64. papa47
    February 11th, 2008 | 04:48

    Of course it has a bad rating at IMDB, it hasn’t hit theaters yet and no one has seen it yet.

  65. m0rtl
    February 11th, 2008 | 04:50

    yastorage linkssss or adrive?? tito where are u

  66. notlolz
    February 11th, 2008 | 05:05

    Day of the Dead is George Romero’s third zombie remake and was originally scheduled for a fall 2007 or spring 2008 theatrical release. When it was screened for test audiences in the US it received a poor response, and it was subsequently pulled from a US theatrical release. MGM must have decided to release it STV so they wouldn’t lose their entire investment.

  67. anonymous
    February 11th, 2008 | 05:30

    This is was surprisingly good. It might just be that my taste has been lowered a bit by a recent splurge into ‘really’ low budget zombie movies, but I’d actually give it a solid 6/10.

  68. TrolleyGuy
    February 11th, 2008 | 05:54

    Damn I hate it when newsgroups get a movie last! lol Been wanting to see this. Does it bring back Bub?

  69. Bob
    February 11th, 2008 | 06:09

    @TrolleyGuy

    Unfortunately, no. Bub will not return in this film. :(

  70. Bobjoe
    February 11th, 2008 | 06:32

    Ok I watched and I actually thought it was pretty good. It isn’t a comedy or anything like that. Think Land of the Dead sequel.

  71. TrolleyGuy
    February 11th, 2008 | 06:53

    @Bob

    Damn, that’s a bit of a downer, Bub was one of the smartest pieces of zombie writing in the horror genre. Have you watched this yet? I actually quite liked the NOTD and DOTD remakes, not as good as Romeros efforts obviously but they weren’t too bad. The ending of the NOTD remaked sucked big time though.

  72. Anonymous
    February 11th, 2008 | 07:07

    @TrolleyGuy

    Yep, there’s a “Bub the zombie” in it. Not nearly as good as in the original, but he was still used to fairly good effect. There was even a nice nod to the first with him near the end of the movie. Still, I was really hoping he’d have an aunt Alisha.

  73. Aaron
    February 11th, 2008 | 07:11

    Thank you so much for this one! Great! I’m really excited about seeing this as I love zombies and cant wait to see what all the bashing is about.

    Zombies don’t run. Ever.

  74. soulcrew
    February 11th, 2008 | 07:43

    dont know where i got this but have had it for about 2 months , and yes it is poorly made with over acting , the idea is good but done poorly

  75. DAY
    February 11th, 2008 | 07:48
  76. D
    February 11th, 2008 | 08:04

    @30

    Thanks for the links. I’ve been waiting on that one. Anyone know when we’ll get a rip of “Machine Girl”? I’m dying to see that

  77. scott
    February 11th, 2008 | 08:25

    dawn(re-hash) is not even a qtr of the original Dawn…! its a bastard film, zombies don’t run. It was more of a 28 days later / zombie flic set in a shopping mall. it didn’t get under my skin at all and everytime I watch the originals I want to turn off but i never do, he is telling a different story to all of the re makes, its not all about the zombies. i bet this effort is just as hollow and lacking as day of the dead the remake.

  78. scott
    February 11th, 2008 | 08:51

    perfect quality but shame about the film, its just another badly thought out effort and is nothing like the original. crack zombies that hide bodies in closets and carry bodies down lanes and are unaffected by electricity by the looks of things plus stupid idea of a breakout! F A I L…

  79. B-Dogg
    February 11th, 2008 | 09:25

    Û
    Û ÛÛ
    Û ÛÛÛ
    Û ÛÛÛÛ
    Û ÛÛÛÛÛ
    Û ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ
    ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ
    Û ÛÛÛÛÛ
    Û ÛÛÛÛ
    Û ÛÛÛ
    Û ÛÛÛ
    Û ÛÛ
    Û
    ÛÛÛÛÛÛ Û Û
    ÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛÛ
    Û ÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛÛ
    ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ Û
    ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ Û
    ÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ Û
    ÛÛ ÛÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ Û
    ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛ ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ Û
    Û
    ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ
    Û
    Û
    Û Title: Day.of.the.Dead.DVDSCR.XviD-ARROW
    Û
    Û
    Û Release Date: 02/10/08
    Û
    Û Retail Date: 4/8/08
    Û
    Û Source: DVD SCREENER
    Û
    Û Bitrate: 995 kbp/s
    Û
    Û Resolution: 608×320
    Û
    Û Audio: DD 2.0
    Û
    Û Filesize: CD1 15MBx50
    Û CD2 15MBx..
    Û
    Û IMDB Rating: 4.1/10 (117 votes)
    Û
    Û IMDB: http://imdb.com/title/tt0489018/
    Û
    Û
    ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ
    Û
    Û
    Û
    Plot: Û
    Û
    When the world is overrun by the flesh hungry Û
    dead a small group of survivors head to an Û
    underground military bunker in a last ditch Û
    effort to stay alive. Û
    Û
    Û
    Û
    Û
    Û
    Notes: Û
    Û
    Enjoy this release with more to come. Û
    Û
    Û
    Û
    Û
    Our NFO sucks make us a new one :) Û
    Û
    Û
    ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ
    Û
    Û
    Û Greets: ANXiETY / FLAiR / CuriousJotos / ThP
    Û DoNE / PreVail / DiAMOND
    Û
    Û
    Û Looking For: Pre-Retail DVD Suppliers
    Û
    Û
    Û ÛÛÛ
    ÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛÛ
    ÛÛÛ

  80. psy
    February 11th, 2008 | 10:24

    Anyone know anything else from this group, i want to send them:
    http://www.pastebin.ca/899629
    they want a new nfo, and i think in 5 mins i made a better one

  81. Mr.Monocle the Chimp
    February 11th, 2008 | 10:28

    Anyone who thinks the remake of Dawn of the Dead is good is a chump, they should watch the first one and see what a real zombie movie is. Same is to be said about this film, just nowhere near as good, bad actors + bad directing. Waiting for Dairy of the Dead and the currently not named Diary of the Dead sequel, both Writen/Directed by Romero.

    BTW zombies can use guns.. first Day of the Dead the soldier Zombie remembers over time. The time is much much longer than in the newer movies though, and it doesn’t seem to matter if they’ve had any experience :S

  82. hitfilm
    February 11th, 2008 | 10:47
  83. The truth
    February 11th, 2008 | 11:22

    “HUGE moneymakers even with all the piracy. If you don’t understand the appeal of flesh eating monsters that used to be human you’re either a homo or a sad Dungeons and Dragons playing nerd. Fear and horror’s appeal is visceral and they tap into an old primal part of the human condition.”

    FU*K YEAH!

  84. Steph
    February 11th, 2008 | 11:29

    The losers who run this site should stop posting their own comments about movies they don’t get.
    Ok, you don’t like zombie movies, you prefer chipmunks things, it’s your right. But please, stop acting as if you were some real movie critic, even if you have seen like 50 movies in your 15 years lifetime.

  85. zombified
    February 11th, 2008 | 16:22

    I’m a movie snob and generally only watch movies which get good reviews from critics, but when it comes to zombies, all that goes out of the window, zombie movies rule!

  86. bungabunga
    February 11th, 2008 | 16:23

    whats up with no adrive, ya, or flyupload? pls someone post some links…btw these spam protection questions are getting harder for me to answer…it took 5 mins to answer 1 + 2

  87. bungabunga
    February 11th, 2008 | 16:26

    #88… mr. x’s opinions usually are how i feel about movies, music, etc except for tom petty…but meh what do you expect from a swede…long live riverdance!

  88. scott
    February 11th, 2008 | 16:33

    this flic was funded by the Taliban!

  89. scott
    February 11th, 2008 | 16:34

    it was directed by the same director who did 2 girls 1 cup…

  90. curious 1.2
    February 11th, 2008 | 17:13

    adrive, yastorage plz!

  91. mupet0000
    February 11th, 2008 | 19:03
  92. Adam Jones
    February 11th, 2008 | 20:09

    #95 – aren’t people sick of bringing up “girls 1 cup” at every given opportunity.

    another zombie movie is always welcome. my theory is that zombies started off as dumbed down TV viewers who just switched off after years of exposure to Jerry Springer and Dancing with the Stars.

  93. max
    February 11th, 2008 | 20:15

    The movie looks complete cack. Could have made a decent attempt at a remake but no… :/

    Will watch it though lol like I do all Zombie movies. Thanks ARROW.

  94. muff for life!!!!
    February 11th, 2008 | 20:32

    zombie flicks, just rock.

    everybody has there own view..me i love um!!!

  95. rocker
    February 11th, 2008 | 20:51

    it’s scientifically proven for example that zombies can’t run, or ‘think’, or ‘be led’ .

    imagine all those zombies locked in cages like monkeys waiting to be dissected for scientific purposes. easier to catch ! maybe well find the cure for cancer. someone should help them escape.

  96. scott
    February 11th, 2008 | 20:57

    it is the same director! you can see the crap on the lens…

  97. PgUp
    February 11th, 2008 | 20:59

    I have never seen so much commentary from so many who have not even watched the effing movie!

    If you like horror movies this is great!!!

    Professional cast, score, editing, production, directing, etc.

    Comparing this or any movie to another from a different “era” is pointless.

  98. Large Elephant
    February 11th, 2008 | 21:21

    @Adam Jones

    I would be interested in anything you could tell me about the movie “2 Girls 1 Cup”, as I have heard people at work talk about it, but I have no clue what all the hype is about.

    Thanks in advance.

  99. Bobby
    February 11th, 2008 | 21:47

    @Large Elephant

    Word of advice, whatever you do, do not watch it lol

    for one thing, it’s not a movie, it’s some weird scat (poop) fetish porn clip. A friend of mine directed me to it and I nearly blew chunks lol

    if u are still interested then u can most likely google it.

  100. scott
    February 11th, 2008 | 22:17

    I wish it was bobby the twat!
    but its actually a screener and read the comments to find out how many think its a porn!

    and if your getting off to this then hey! whatever your into RIGHT?

    its a terrible film! don’t watch it or go to see it!

  101. marktd
    February 11th, 2008 | 23:19

    worth a watch if you really have nothing better to do
    but it is “Ghosts of Mars” bad :P

  102. l.y
    February 11th, 2008 | 23:34

    2girls 1 cup is funny as f*ck
    is it really as bad as ghosts of mars
    didnt george.a.romero(might be spelt wrong)
    do this?

  103. Bobby
    February 11th, 2008 | 23:37

    @scott i was referring to “2 Girls and 1 Cup” that #105 was asking about. This movie shown in this topic is definately not a porn…but it is an ok movie..kinda weird tho

  104. Bobby
    February 11th, 2008 | 23:40

    heres the wikipedia link to the info related to “2 girls and cup” not spamming, just showing you the info without actually directing you to the video

    This is for #105

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_Girls_1_Cup

  105. Bobby
    February 11th, 2008 | 23:42

    i meant #104

  106. Large Elephant
    February 12th, 2008 | 00:05

    @Bobby

    You’ve now had to correct your own comments three times. I no longer consider you a reliable source of information.

    Please refrain from answering any more of my inquiries until further notice. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause you.

  107. Bobby
    February 12th, 2008 | 00:11

    lol ok then

  108. scott
    February 12th, 2008 | 00:42

    oops I see now lol sorry Bob ,don’t watch that 2 girls vid without a bucket to catch you dinner!!

  109. l.y
    February 12th, 2008 | 00:53

    scott, its not that bad,wanna see bad watch 2 girls 1 finger,
    thats bad

  110. mbone
    February 12th, 2008 | 01:23

    this film is funny..hehe it shows that you can buy ak47 and uzi in american stores and any one in usa can shoot…hahahaha

  111. Weed
    February 12th, 2008 | 01:26
  112. Bobby
    February 12th, 2008 | 01:29

    @scott

    LMAO :)

  113. scott
    February 12th, 2008 | 01:57

    LOL! whats this 1 finger vid? are they Lepers?
    I tried my best to watch the 2 girls 1 cup, but the gargling brought tears to my eye’s and I nearly ruined my lap top with puke, can’t watch the whole thing to save my life

  114. Bobby
    February 12th, 2008 | 02:02

    LOL after seeing 2 girls 1 cup…I don’t think I even want to know what the finger one is LMAO

    don’t think i can handle vomiting more than once a day LOL

  115. Vito
    February 12th, 2008 | 02:06
  116. welitis
    February 12th, 2008 | 02:20

    Good job Vito

  117. Shahnam
    February 12th, 2008 | 03:03

    Hey guys! thanks for sharing…
    could any 1 put a link of sharedzilla or any direct link with resume support ?

  118. jay
    February 12th, 2008 | 03:50

    I was really looking forward to seeing this but man I was pretty disapointed… Acting was hit or miss and it just seems that actors were just there to get paid… This new style of almost animal like zombies is just really …. well….. terrible… Climbing on walls like cats!! I could not even finish the movie if that tells how bad it was and this is coming from a big zombie movie fan…

  119. l.y
    February 12th, 2008 | 03:54

    2 girls 1 finger
    “spoiler”
    she sh*ts straight into the other girls mouth and then they have a puking party

  120. dan
    February 12th, 2008 | 05:28

    Diary of the dead by george Romero has been renamed to World of the dead with the working name as Dead Planet

  121. Burnsy
    February 12th, 2008 | 06:07

    I hate to say it but this movie sucked. I am a huge zombie fan, and was waiting for this to drop for some time. What sucked the most to me was the fact that when the people turn into zombies, they seem to turn into gymnist zombies. These things were flying all over the place, I even saw one jump up onto a ceiling and crawl on it for a few seconds like an ‘Alien’. Here’s to NO more remakes like this.

  122. Dub
    February 12th, 2008 | 06:11
  123. papa47
    February 12th, 2008 | 07:01

    WOW! This movie was a steaming pile of crap. And I really liked the remake of Dawn of the Dead and Land of the Dead they did a few years back, I was expecting something on par with the first two remakes, this one was WAY off from the other two remakes. Terrible, terrible!!

  124. KOBRA
    February 12th, 2008 | 13:46

    is the video and the audio quality good????

  125. marktd
    February 12th, 2008 | 14:55

    @130
    yeah video and sound is fine … just a copyrite message ( lasting about 10 sec ) about 3 times during movie …
    as bad as film was gotta say Mena Suvari is looking good ;) esp in that military getup :) at least she made it watchable

  126. mehiy
    February 12th, 2008 | 17:49

    any one have subtitle

  127. Vincent Chase
    February 12th, 2008 | 21:20

    Thanks Vito!

  128. Reviewer
    February 12th, 2008 | 21:31

    Review:

    Hello guys, just popped into rlslog, and found this release
    I thought i’d download it and review it for you guys
    So here it is:

    From the start of the movie, you can tell, it has been a hopeful release for the producers and directors, but it is also really obvious that the movie is a low-budget one
    If you manage to let this thought subside while watching this movie, you can enjoy it up until 30mins, but then the whole movie, the scene, the acting, everything starts to drag.
    The acting is poor in some scenes, and so is the direction, there is too much horror music.
    After an hour of watching this movie, i started to think to myself, “i am not enoying this, so why am i watching it?”
    Without giving away spolers though, the storyline is clever, and it gets you thinking
    If you want to watch a movie, and dont know what to watch, i recommend this
    Also, if you are a horror – zombie fan (although this movie does not seem too horrific, other than the poor acting and direction), it can be a decent movie, if you want to pass the time.
    I rate this movie 4.5/10,

  129. Wh8shttas
    February 13th, 2008 | 08:49

    Nik Cannon shows what a white little skinny beeotch can ruin a movie.

  130. JigzJuggalo
    February 14th, 2008 | 15:44

    Didnt bore me to death like those so-called hit movies like Hitman and Beowulf which put me to sleep.
    Alot of Action,Blood,Gore and Violence.It has everything a Zombie Movie should have.
    As for Nick Cannon starring in it, didnt bother me none as long as the Movies Good i don’t care who the cast consist of.
    A Must see for all Zombie Lovers.

  131. joe satriani
    February 15th, 2008 | 10:34

    Vito..can you invite me to therebels.com.br please…send me to my email: whitelibra_boyz@yahoo.com

    very grateful for your help Vito..Thnk for the movie..

  132. Joske
    February 15th, 2008 | 17:13

    Ljudi moze li mala pomoc oko prevoda na srpski,gde da ga nadjem za ovaj film

  133. Lockett
    February 17th, 2008 | 01:34

    To all you dumbass ppl talkin bad bout this movie it will hit the theathres in April. This is a screener for all those who like good quality films. Now if this release would of came out in april you wouldn’t be sayin nothing bout it so love it. Im bout to sell this and tell em it dont come out to April and good horror!!!1

  134. brett
    March 26th, 2008 | 01:50

    HOW DO I PLAY THESE arw-dofd.xvid OR RAR FILES

    PLEASE HELP
    CHEERS BRETT

Leave a reply