Releaselog

Day Night Day Night LiMiTED DVDRip REPACK XviD-BeStDiVx

A pretty amazing film awarded by 5 movie awards and positively accepted by almost every critic arrived to DVDs and guys from group BestDivX bring us the repack. The first release was nuked for bad IVTC, this one is fixed and looks much better. As for the film, it’s a criminal thriller about a young woman who decides to blow up a bomb at Times Square. Be sure to check the trailer and eventually download this nice flick.

A 19-year-old girl prepares to become a suicide bomber in Times Square. Her accent is not particularly out of place and it’s impossible to pinpoint her ethnicity. We never learn why she made her decision — she has made it already. We don’t know whom she represents, what she believes in – we only know she believes it absolutely. The film strips the story down to its existential core. It focuses on microscopic movements, the smallest gestures, an economy of banal details. Inspired in part by a story in a Russian newspaper and playing off a history of Joan of Arc films, the film transpires on the girl’s face. The minimalism of the face is confronted with the visual and aural noise of the city. Faith comes face-to-face with the possibility of failure.

Day.Night.Day.Night.LiMiTED.DVDRip.REPACK.XviD-BeStDiVx

1 CD, 700 MB, bestdivx-dndnrp-xvid
91 min, 936 kbit, 608×336 px, mp3
IMDB (7.2), RT (70%), NFO, torrent

Comments (37)

Feel free to post your Day Night Day Night LiMiTED DVDRip REPACK XviD-BeStDiVx torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. Stas
    October 1st, 2007 | 13:17

    mixed reviews on IMDB….might give it a try. thnx

  2. devious
    October 1st, 2007 | 13:35

    Why 608×336 resolution? This must surely be a 1.85 aspect ratio, so the correct resolution would be 624×336. Why are there 16 pixels shaved off the width? All that will do is to squeeze the image by 2.5%. I thought scene groups always got resolution perfectly in line with the rules – as close as possible to aspect ratio 2.35 or 1.85 and numbers divisible by 16. Ideally, 640×272 (2.35) and 592×320 (1.85).

  3. John
    October 1st, 2007 | 13:38

    I read the plot summary. Seems interesting. Of course when it comes to a terroristic act it would be set in New York City.

  4. Stas
    October 1st, 2007 | 13:47

    LOL @ devious

  5. gossipninja
    October 1st, 2007 | 14:04

    devious is right though, why do groups mess up the AR, not to say its out of proportion, but why not use all thats available?

  6. Fastest AR Calculator In Town
    October 1st, 2007 | 14:34

    Yeah, just leave it up to “Mr.Math” Devious here to calculate AR:s and whine about them. LOL. I mean this guy must feel himself pretty fuckin superstar armed with his calculator.LMAO. He’s got his fingers on the calculator like cowboy slingin guns. But to be hones here, i think he should stick them fingers to pussy instead, maybe that would cool him down. Fuckin Baby.

  7. yakayakayoo
    October 1st, 2007 | 14:41

    #6 becuz the resolution of the movie must not be too big for the given bitrate. Too low bitrate + too big resolution equals bullshit. If the resolution is too low, the higher bitrate is useless too.

  8. Tom
    October 1st, 2007 | 14:45

    he is just another lamer kid.

  9. Tom you said it
    October 1st, 2007 | 14:51

    Yeah, he sure he is. Yet he has to show off here with his Bold, Italic Bullshit. I wish he would just die of aids or somethin

  10. Tawton9
    October 1st, 2007 | 15:36
  11. []D[][]v[][]D
    October 1st, 2007 | 15:39

    gay movie.. she does not blow up…she does bath,shave,wash her panties in the sink…Zzzzzzz

  12. Obscurax
    October 1st, 2007 | 15:41

    Might be an interesting flick.
    I don’t understand terrorists altough I would like to blow up some things once and a while :) .
    Kids mind your own business and keep the negative comments for yourself.
    I don’t care much about the aspect ratio, but the scene has rules and rules are to be followed to give us the quality we expect.

  13. M
    October 1st, 2007 | 15:45

    Saw this over a year ago at a film fest… worth watching.

  14. iNFO
    October 1st, 2007 | 16:18

    2007-09-30
    Day.Night.Day.Night.LiMiTED.DVDRip.REPACK.XviD-BeStDiVx
    [NUKED]:bad.ivtc_bad.crop_i21.tinypic.com.29gbiut.jpg

  15. ollietoon
    October 1st, 2007 | 16:21

    been trying to download for a good few hours but nothing happening in utorrent. Any else having same probs ?

  16. keys
    October 1st, 2007 | 16:26

    the answer to his question is probably because of some black space that was cropped off the sides

    but like a 2% error or something on ar is no big fucking deal

    and not all movies stick exactly to 2.35:1 or 1.85:1

    stop bitching

  17. 8==D
    October 1st, 2007 | 17:12

    Post 15: []D[][]v[][]D, as you call yourself, you are a stupid fucking cunt. Do you know what a ’spoiler’ is? You piece of shit, some people want to know a bit about a movie without some junior-high masturbator telling everyone what happens.

    Please ask your parents to confiscate your computer, you stupid little shit.

  18. quacks
    October 1st, 2007 | 17:25

    agreed, that gave it away pretty good, unfortunate cause i was on the fence ab watching it. Hence checking the board. How bout a little less flaming as well…though i suppose at this point it doesnt matter, to me anyway

  19. Devious
    October 1st, 2007 | 17:26

    Know what’s worse than spoilers? BAD AR!!! Nothing is worse than a movie being 10 pixels too small. Nothing!

  20. TRON
    October 1st, 2007 | 17:54

    Demonoid back or what? Was up for like an hour and then went down again. WTF.

  21. vuzer
    October 1st, 2007 | 19:16

    @ thx to []D[][]v[][]D – for the “spoiler” = cann someone pls upload this file (700mb) to > http://file2upload.net
    it works better than rapidshare and is good/fast and have no blocks for not registering ppl!

    ps:

    i hate rapidshare.. its very fast but they will checking now the id/ip if someone register and check their files…. what they download

  22. devious + []D[][]v[][]D
    October 1st, 2007 | 19:46

    Hey we just wanted everyone to know that we’re getting married.
    You’re all invited. Chinese or Russian R5s will do for nice gifts ;)
    Pls stop commenting we don’t get any action. It’s obvious that we do… from each other.
    Have a nice day!
    Love,
    aXXo

  23. lee welton
    October 1st, 2007 | 20:01

    the previous wedding announcement was not written by me. and its not real either.

  24. John
    October 1st, 2007 | 20:03

    Damn! I was hoping to see a kablooey or two. Very disappointed.

  25. Americunt
    October 1st, 2007 | 20:37

    But that being said, I do like to indulge in a bit of cock stroking now and then.

  26. Sean McGuinness
    October 1st, 2007 | 21:16

    England out of Ireland!

  27. Darren
    October 1st, 2007 | 23:09

    I am also having problems downloading it…it says i can only seed and not leech…then goes in to timeout errors.

  28. pietrek
    October 1st, 2007 | 23:19

    So am I. Timeouts, strange messages from trackers and dl. at 10 KiB/s max.
    Running Deluge on Linux.

  29. ed
    October 2nd, 2007 | 04:18

    the tracker is private, both torrents on newtorrents and piratebay are useless.

  30. seanprince
    October 2nd, 2007 | 04:27

    the tracker is private, both torrents on newtorrents and piratebay are useless. DOES NOT WORK FOR ME EITHER.

  31. Stix
    October 2nd, 2007 | 12:09

    I bet its working now. The trackers have been down or updated or something,,,fek knows.

    about the AR : Fuckin too right it should be correct. You tell ‘em devious.

  32. seanprince
    October 2nd, 2007 | 14:24

    Still not working i got it from here http://www.mininova.org/tor/917381

  33. NEGRO aXXo
    October 5th, 2007 | 03:35

    BORING TRASHY MOVIE!!!!!!!!!

  34. Dalek
    October 8th, 2007 | 19:00

    No point in such a long movie, condensed to 5 min works. Really, it is a crappy indi film. I have nothing against independent films, a lot of good ones, but, this had NOTHING to it. It is like someones college project Really, the only reason this got reviews is because it is “indie” and since everyone is so original, they HAVE to see it in order to “conform” to the indie way to make a statement that they don’t conform. It makes no sense to me either… even what I just wrote.

    Ok, watching this movie made me feel like I was back in Wicker Park years ago when the “cool” thing was to be indie, before lincoln park yuppies needed more space for their Hummers and took over the neighborhood, running all the poor artists and film makers to Logan Square. The director of this film probably went with the bunch, the Director of Street Thief, well, he is probably living in Lincoln Park :)

  35. Barry
    October 9th, 2007 | 23:12

    This movie is terrible. 0/10

    Pure waste of time.

  36. Rom
    October 10th, 2007 | 09:39

    Hmmm wasn’t there already a PROPER rls by VoMiT ??

  37. avanzaa
    October 10th, 2007 | 14:20

    worst movie. ever. she does eat alot, hopefully all that walking with the backback helped her shed some kilos……

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!