Comments on: DAEMON Tools Pro v4 10 0215 32bit INTERNAL-PARADOX

By: Labimoh64

Labimoh64 — Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:52:18 +0000

bonjour

By: ken

ken — Tue, 27 May 2008 01:41:44 +0000

i hate the freadking Advantag. totally no use to us. but keep eating ram

By: james

james — Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:51:33 +0000

When i copy over and replace the .dll file in the install folder, it will either say error or it will work, but the app wont open any longer, and if i dont copy the patch over than i gotta do this trial bulllshit.?? any advice?

By: jason

jason — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:11:40 +0000

well, i finally get to try out dt pro. it’s unfortunate that a paying customer has to resort to a cracked ver though. i’ve been trying for a month to get lob to update my information so i can download my copy that i paid for over 2 yrs ago. even though according to them i only supported the effort at the time and for my contribution i get to d/l pro. it really pisses me off that dt is going the way of big business. give less expect more. they no longer offer lifetime support/ upgrades. i’m so fed up with windows and its bs software i’m ready to switch to linux for 100% of my support. games or no games.

By: Kloon

Kloon — Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:33:36 +0000

No, there was no fucking question whether to install it or not. Furthermore, it’s been injected into the dtprohlp.dll and DT won’t function w/o that file.

By: Mr. X

Mr. X — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:40:53 +0000

sure, they really care about your boycott because you really paid for their software, like an honest person.

By: WingAttackGroupExIII

WingAttackGroupExIII — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:13:19 +0000

Well I just checked qurantine and the crack for this program was sent there cause nod32 detected it as adware: Win32/Adware.WhenU.SaveNow. That is why I got the dtprohlp.dll error. Daemon tools makers: Dont use adware assholes. Use something that doesnt send data back to the fucking company. It’s a autoinstall too for the pro edition. I’ll stick to alcohol 120 and boycott daemon tools for the adware.

By: WingAttackGroupExIII

WingAttackGroupExIII — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:50:43 +0000

Well my nod32 didnt detect a virus or a trojan.

By: shaneo

shaneo — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:49:56 +0000

Same here, virus.
Well Done Fucking Twat

By: Coffin.Filler

Coffin.Filler — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:37:56 +0000

Thanx for the heads up (regarding the posts that actualy containe usefull info).

However to help me get this straight. = Im using DT (and have always) v 4.09HE.
What advantage is their for us to go with the pro version ? Is it true that this version is not going to be blacklisted due to the expanded scrambled coding ?. (as in developers wont be able to blacklist the pro version so simply?). I find this hard to belive.
So what are the advantages of going to pro ?

By: Q

Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:36:29 +0000

strange they went back to an nfo design from 2001
and still have greets for old groups

By: magusat999

magusat999 — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:25:39 +0000

Since nobody except iMike has inputted an answer to “What does the Pro version have that the free version doesn’t” I decided it might be advantageous to translate his text. This is the straight, un-edited translation – so you’ll have to figure it out from there…:

[quote]
4all Russian main advantage to upgrade 2 Pro:

Despite the universal virtual SCSI-privoda, at the moment he ceases to discharge its responsibilities, as well as developers of modern defence made to blacklist all virtual devices to block the work of emulation. This prompted the authors D-Tools to create an expanded, but scrambled version DAEMON Tools Pro, which, in addition to options write images to CD / DVD, recorded and the new module-virtual IDE-privodom. Such a decision would, in principle, eliminate any blocking of the emulator, and it certainly will like all enthusiasts. While the implementation of such a complex device (it is not surprising that the beta and clean mind to D-Tools Pro lasted for more than a year!) , After his exit, it will leave the decision to emulate and accurate copy protected CD / DVD. Of course, if you purchased it legally, which is also relentlessly remind developer on the front page of the draft…
[/quote]

By: magusat999

magusat999 — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:17:48 +0000

Both XviD and DivX were created by COMMUNITIES of people. bob is talking as if they were developed by a closed circle of people who actually owned the codec – that is WRONG and that’s what’s WRONG with thinking it’s okay to start selling it. It doesn’t and SHOULDN’T belong to anyone to sell in the first place, because it was developed and tweaked by the general public – FOR FREE. Just like Linux, we all created it together, so we should not be charged for it (who OWNS it anyway? Shouldn’t BOTH codecs be PUBLIC DOMAIN???). So who give a jack shit how loooooooooooong it’s been offered for free IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE.

Why don’t YOU fuck off, bob, or spend 5 years figuring out how to create something without parasiting the public…

By: bob

bob — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:05:42 +0000

XviD was out long before DivX went Pro/commercial. And DT has been commercially released for a looooooooooong time!

And f*ck you for whining when great programmers wants to get something back for their hard work. You can still get the free version, just like DivX.

Why don’t you f*ck off or spend 5 years programming something the world wants for free yourself!

By: piss

piss — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:49:58 +0000

pro x64/64-bit version would be nice…