Releaselog

Curse Of The Zodiac 2007 STV DVDRip XviD-JFKXVID

Woohoo, another scary crapstory! Curse of The Zodiac is an STV thriller released on 1 CD by group JFKXVID, which can’t be recommended to anyone who isn’t used to these cheap flicks. It’s not even listed at IMDB and you would have probably hard time trying to find it in your local videoshop. Anyway, we get it for free 4 days before retail date so here it is for you in usual dvdrip quality.

Genre guru Ulli Lommel (THE BOOGEYMAN, BTK KILLER) directs this horror film about the infamous Zodiac killer. Though decades have passed since the multiple murderer held the state of California hostage with fear, the mystery of his identity has never been solved. Inspired by the true story of the Serial Killer who terrorized Northern California during the sixties and seventies. His use of cryptic symbols and coded messages fueled the police and media frenzy and made him one of America’s most notorious unsolved cases.

Genre: Horror
IMDB rating:
n/a
Directed by: Ulli Lommel
Starring: Jack Quinn, Cassandra Church

Release name: Curse.Of.The.Zodiac.2007.STV.DVDRip.XviD-JFKXVID
Size: 1 CD, 0.7 GB, 50×15 MB
Runtime: 82 minutes
Quality: DVDRiP, 1028 kbps XviD, 672×368 px, MP3 audio
File name: curse-jfkxvid

Links: Amazon
NFO: here
Torrent: NewTorrents

Comments (26)

Feel free to post your Curse Of The Zodiac 2007 STV DVDRip XviD-JFKXVID torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. May 11th, 2007 | 21:02

    no comment

  2. nxxs
    May 11th, 2007 | 21:03

    Hi there!

    Wait till the end of this month, then the “good” version of this film, called simply “Zodiac” will be released. I honestly dont know, if that version will be better, but the listed cast shows promise. also, this film was promoted some time ago on the daily show.

  3. SoniKalien
    May 11th, 2007 | 21:15

    Maybe they released ‘Curse Of The Zodiac’ at the same time as ‘Zodiac’ knowing that ‘Curse Of The Zodiac’ is going to suck so they make more sales because people get the 2 movies confused and end up buying ‘Curse..’ thinking it’s ‘Zodiac’

  4. Geek
    May 11th, 2007 | 21:53

    WHY do guys that claim to hate this stuff insist on posting that same rhetoric over again everytime? Yeah, Lommel’s current output is horribly craptacular. But some of it is so hilariously bad it’s worth a laugh with beer and chips. There was one where the zombies just chicks with dark eye makeup.It sucked ass, but holy crap it was funny. Not all comedies are intentional. Now if some Australian(only released there) could upload a DVDrip of Lommel’s PICKTON that would be awesome.

  5. mw
    May 11th, 2007 | 22:16

    hei there is a movie called Zodiac that is close to come out way better than this crap to imitate like snake on a train with snakes in a plane , well they but sucked to tell the truth

  6. IKnowAll
    May 11th, 2007 | 22:24

    thanks for this :D

    keep it up!!

  7. Anonymux
    May 11th, 2007 | 22:34

    If you know it is crap, why even post it?
    Seems like you guys do not post everything new released, so why post this piece of crap?

  8. danman
    May 11th, 2007 | 23:40

    3 films now about the Zodiac! Is there any need? Because at the end of the film they say “btw we don’t know who he is”

  9. Mike
    May 11th, 2007 | 23:47

    “If you know it is crap, why even post it?
    Seems like you guys do not post everything new released, so why post this piece of crap?”

    exactly! people wont use this site anymore if it becomes bloated with shit, might as well use a search engine. what a waste of time posting this film. just stick to vcdquality and various torrent sites people, this place is losing it.

  10. Tubby Khunt
    May 12th, 2007 | 01:43

    For fucks sake - where is David Fincher’s recent 2007 version? This is like the 3rd crap telemovie release. While the recent movie only has shit CAM job floating around. Bring on the fucking DVD Screeners I say!!!!

  11. dalecooper
    May 12th, 2007 | 03:17

    “If you know it is crap, why even post it?
    Seems like you guys do not post everything new released, so why post this piece of crap?”

    exactly! people wont use this site anymore if it becomes bloated with shit, might as well use a search engine. what a waste of time posting this film. just stick to vcdquality and various torrent sites people, this place is losing it.

    Is this mike ( Self important TWAT ) who used to post his torrentleech Invites things on here ?

    If so YOU GOT FUCKING BANNED,
    HA HA

  12. dalecooper
    May 12th, 2007 | 03:37

    If i have the wrong MIKE, I As a gentleman and Scholar am so Sorry and apologize unreservedly to any other MIKE’S Whom i may have offended. : ( .

    If i have the right MIKE,
    YOU GOT BANNED ( TORRENTLEECH )
    CUNT.

  13. jitter
    May 12th, 2007 | 05:07

    I for one, am glad that rlslog stick to their principle of posting info about (mostly) all new scene releases. This way I have found many movies that I wouldn’t have considered downloading otherwise. Some better or worse of course. :P

    Now, if you want a listing of new or upcoming movies that only are hyped or feature the most popular actors, surely you can find that elsewhere?

  14. demon
    May 12th, 2007 | 05:20

    Maybe it was a slow day for new releases so mike decided to throw in a B-movie…

    You dont have to download if you dont want to.

  15. Ronnie
    May 12th, 2007 | 07:01

    You people whine way too much.

  16. Alcarnor
    May 12th, 2007 | 09:32
  17. Geek
    May 12th, 2007 | 10:16

    “I for one, am glad that rlslog stick to their principle of posting info about (mostly) all new scene releases. This way I have found many movies that I wouldn’t have considered downloading otherwise. Some better or worse of course.

    Now, if you want a listing of new or upcoming movies that only are hyped or feature the most popular actors, surely you can find that elsewhere?”

    You got down it Jitter. Everyone knows of the popular releases not everyone knows about a lot of the smaller ones. Whether people will like those is a matter of personal taste, but ALL should be posted.

  18. TupaC
    May 12th, 2007 | 15:59

    True they try make some money with this “movie” many ppl confused this movie with the real Zodiac movie.

  19. IKnowAll
    May 12th, 2007 | 17:36

    ppl whine about everything here, if you dont like the movie, scroll down the fucking page and go to another release.. is that so hard to do???

  20. QuadrupelQ
    May 13th, 2007 | 11:58

    “I for one, am glad that rlslog stick to their principle of posting info about (mostly) all new scene releases”

    Agreed, but we also get Martins moronic opinions with every single release. Every single time he is negative about a movie, and thus every time the question “why do they post this?” comes to mind. If it’s crap, don’t bother logging it. Or if you do want to show all scene releases (which they don’t by the way) keep the opinions about the movie to yourself, and just give us the skinny about AV-quality and a link to IMDB.

  21. Nick
    May 13th, 2007 | 14:56

    “Every single time he is negative about a movie, and thus every time the question “why do they post this?” comes to mind.”

    This is release log. They post releases. Everyone has opinions. You’re voicing yours with that last comment :)
    And it’s possible that before, there weren’t enough people to be checking newtorrents constantly for new releases. So, perhaps now that they’ve added a significant amount of people to the team, we will start to see more of all releases.

  22. joker
    May 14th, 2007 | 15:07

    Wow…this movie is poor, turned it off after literally 3 mins!!.. Someone may find it interesting though.

  23. May 15th, 2007 | 22:21

    Curse Of The Zodiac 2007 PROPER DVDRip XviD-FiCO

  24. Mark
    May 21st, 2007 | 02:18

    Poor, bad, “B” grade no way.. more like
    An “F”. Bad acting, bad photography, looks and plays like a rubbish home production. I was curious so I downloaded. Stupid me !

  25. Rob
    May 27th, 2007 | 19:52

    Wow! Best Movie I’ve Ever Seen!
    Rob

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!