Releaselog

Cloverfield DVDRip XviD AC3 iNT-DEViSE

A lot of you have complained about the low quality of the DiAMOND DVDRip of this movie, but thanks to DEViSE we now have the internal release. There has been a lot of talk about an HD version coming up, and to tell you the truth I have no clue whether there will be one, but this is the best we have now (except for the DVDR).

Quality: Since this movie is rather short the bitrate on this one is a whopping 1970kbps with a res of 720×416 :D AC3 5.1 audio is included as always, and although there aren’t any subs, use the ones from the DiAMOND release.

Cloverfield follows five New Yorkers from the perspective of hand held video camera. The movie is exactly the length of a DV Tape and a sub-plot is established by showing bits and pieces of video previously recorded on the tape that is being recorded over. The movie starts as a monster of unknown origin destroys a building. As they go to investigate, parts of the building and the head of the Statue of Liberty come raining down. The movie follows their adventure trying to escape and save a friend, a love interest of the main character.

Genre: Action / Mystery / Sci-Fi / Thriller
Ratings: IMDB 7.8/10 (59,581 votes) RT 76%
Directed by: Matt Reeves
Starring: Lizzy Caplan, Jessica Lucas, T.J. Miller, Michael Stahl-David, Mike Vogel

Release Name: Cloverfield.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.iNT-DEViSE
Size: 2CD, 1.37GB
Video Quality: DVDRip, XViD, 720×416, 1970kbps, 23.976 FPS
Audio Quality: AC3 5.1, 448kbps
Runtime: 85 minutes
Filename: devise-cloverfield.cd1, devise-cloverfield.cd2

Links: IMDB, Homepage, Trailer
NFO: here
Torrent: NewTorrents
NZB: Newzleech Search
Posters: 1183×1600, 1298×1500, 1100×1645

Comments (265)

Feel free to post your Cloverfield DVDRip XviD AC3 iNT-DEViSE torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All
  1. User_of_World
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:26

    BATTLESTAR GALACTICA
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:13
    WHEN THE HELL IS THE PREMIERE OF BATTLESTAR GALACTICA GONNA BE POSTED???

    As soon as a fkn bus runs you over. Same goes for all other BSG spammers here!

  2. uYa
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:28
  3. alexis
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:29
  4. Sample?
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:31

    @100 For correcting the likes of you? not really. If anything you should be thanking me for sharing information that you and others here probably never would have researched nor would most others have publicly disclosed.

    The only way I could be considered a dumbass is wasting time trying to explain information to people who have no desire or care to realize what they are talking about.

  5. User_of_World
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:33

    Even though I have watched each season 3 times. Itz the k00Lest sh0w 3v3r!!!

  6. 8800GTOC
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:37

    What should we download then aXXo or this??..

  7. Termin4T0R
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:41

    @66 Cody,
    It’s not really an easter egg. I just thought I saw someone with their arm stuck out when I was doing something while watching the helicopter crash out of the corner of my eye. At first I thought it was a cut of an army guy telling them to get back. Then I rewound and paused and screenshot it then posted it on photobucket. Someone mentioned they had some filmed scences of coney island that this was being taped over. My question is , Is there a poster of King Kong like that at coney island? Then it would make sense. But if not then it’s J.J Abrams just mind-phukin with the viewers again with “Look at my big-bad monster movie! It’s better than King Kong!”

  8. katel2k
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:49

    any FILEFACTORY LINKS?

  9. netload
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:52

    netload links plz

  10. THiZZ
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:59
  11. clayeman
    April 5th, 2008 | 10:03

    one missed call is down for R5 release 22nd April.

  12. katel2k
    April 5th, 2008 | 10:05

    FILE FACTORY PLEASE

  13. robz
    April 5th, 2008 | 10:11

    dont pay attention to negative comments. just read comment 87. Well said mate :)

  14. fungus
    April 5th, 2008 | 10:28

    Diamond release was perfect and I watched on my 42″ not my pc, movie wasn’t too bad either. where you gonna stop? you’ll want 3 cd next for an 85 minute movie!

  15. Are you stupid?
    April 5th, 2008 | 10:33

    which release?

  16. Pungen
    April 5th, 2008 | 10:38

    @107: Download this or DMDs rip if you want 1 CD. Never download aXXo!

  17. Nomad
    April 5th, 2008 | 10:40

    Hey what do you suspect, dmd just follewed scene rules when releasing this movie, rules say NO 2 CD version for 85 min film, If the movie reaches almost two hours then we can rls it on a two cd version.! and still… they prove they have a good source!

  18. Blobsters
    April 5th, 2008 | 10:43

    diamond should be ashamed! banned them from rlslog until they release descent rips!

  19. ryan
    April 5th, 2008 | 10:51

    @88

    i totally agree, i’m a film major and i often critque and disect films to end, and i must say i throughly enjoyed this film

  20. ryan
    April 5th, 2008 | 10:53

    @36

    hey thanks for the heads up about you links being telesync dumbass.

    guys do not download #36 links there for the telesync NOT i repeat NOT the dvd-rip.

  21. iNFORMATiON
    April 5th, 2008 | 10:57

    Cloverfield.DVDRip.x264.AC3-WoLF

    Video Details:
    Video Technical Specs
    #Video Bitrate: 1820 kbps
    #Resolution: 720×480 anamorphic (16×9)
    #Container: Matroska (.mkv)
    #Source: Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica – Untouched Video & Audio

    Main Audio Track – Main Movie
    #Language: English
    #Bitrate: 384 kbps AC3
    #Sample Rate: 48 Khz

    Secondary Audio Track – Commentary
    #Language: English
    #Bitrate: 192 kbps AC3
    #Sample Rate: 48 Khz

    Sample:
    http://www.mediafire.com/?ad1fcdl3hl1

  22. suresh
    April 5th, 2008 | 11:08
  23. adama
    April 5th, 2008 | 11:09

    BSG s04e1 720p?

  24. mupet0000
    April 5th, 2008 | 11:42

    Someone upload this to usenet please.

  25. doovde
    April 5th, 2008 | 11:43

    @123
    Those are the DIAMOND release man :P

  26. ross the snitch
    April 5th, 2008 | 11:57

    stop spamming you bsg homos, what what in the butt!

    the diamond rip of cloverfield was fine, just watched it on my 42″ lcd and it looked good, movie was wayyyyy better than I expected, a great monster film

  27. smurfstah
    April 5th, 2008 | 11:59

    i dont usually comment on these sorta arguments but in this very rare case i would like to point out that

    1. diamonds release was fine.i downloaded it, watched it. perfect quality

    2. HOWEVER. since ive invested and own a top of the line dolby digital 5.1 system, having a movie with AC3 sound (along with a nice big lcd) is just that extra icing on the cake :P so i will be downloading this release and deleting the other. do i care i already downloaded 700mb? nope. but damm i cant wait to enjoy this movie in total 5.1 immersion!

    yea just my 2cents.

    Boh Selectah!!

  28. munch
    April 5th, 2008 | 12:08

    how do i burn both parts of the film as one film on dvd?

  29. Bob
    April 5th, 2008 | 12:09

    Oh dear this movie is really crappy!! and its by J.J.Abrams i just hope he does a better job of the new Star Trek Movie, but i’m not to sure after looking at the cast.

  30. Superman
    April 5th, 2008 | 12:31
  31. dave
    April 5th, 2008 | 12:31

    @ 122. INFORMATION

    Where do you find those x264 dvdrips ?, they never seem to appear on usenet.

    Thanks,
    Dave

  32. none
    April 5th, 2008 | 12:38

    Watched the diamond release yesterday, Really good film i did find the shaky camera effect to get a bit enoying & i dont really rate the actors, but still it didnt ruin the film, pleasently supprised & well worth a watch

  33. hi-jinx
    April 5th, 2008 | 12:41

    So what’s this rumor about the DEViSE rls being an upscaled transcode of the DiAMOND rls? Yeah, for sure, any average encoder can re-encode an XviD at a higher bitrate and resolution (with, of course, no improvement in video quality)… but transcoding stereo sound into 6 channels…? I can’t even believe there’s software available to do that, since it’s basically just faking.

  34. kAo
    April 5th, 2008 | 12:45
  35. pj
    April 5th, 2008 | 12:55

    glad i hadnt downloaded the other RIPs
    might get this one, dont expect another one coming

  36. deaglecat
    April 5th, 2008 | 12:56

    Marceli… if you are going to delete the files then please delete the post as well.

    Otherwise, waste of bandwidth… which is never good.

  37. Naut
    April 5th, 2008 | 12:58

    i just bought a pc and ordered an internet connection from my phone ISP just to be able to post this comment for you:

    marlena is breathtakingly hot.

  38. movie critic
    April 5th, 2008 | 13:21

    This movie its a CRAP!

  39. Maxpeck
    April 5th, 2008 | 13:24

    Links dead. Only got three parts to go, repost much appreciated

  40. stix
    April 5th, 2008 | 13:25

    @#129 munch

    join the two halves together first. (virtual dub)

  41. Assassin
    April 5th, 2008 | 13:32
  42. Shrike
    April 5th, 2008 | 13:32

    Wolf release is much better

  43. Guest101
    April 5th, 2008 | 13:34
  44. kek
    April 5th, 2008 | 13:39

    I wish the scene would wake up and switch to x264 DVDRips in 1/x DVD size finally …

  45. kkash
    April 5th, 2008 | 13:43

    get the replica release it’s iso

    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750297/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part01.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750406/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part02.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750537/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part03.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750657/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part04.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750821/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part05.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750948/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part06.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751097/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part07.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751306/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part08.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751481/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part09.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751621/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part10.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751951/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part11.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752112/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part12.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752255/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part13.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752427/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part14.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752539/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part15.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752645/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part16.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752726/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part17.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752806/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part18.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752924/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part19.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104753062/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part20.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104753226/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part21.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104753312/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part22.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750509/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part23.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750629/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part24.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750789/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part25.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750922/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part26.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751059/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part27.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751228/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part28.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751436/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part29.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751589/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part30.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751918/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part31.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752079/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part32.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752204/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part33.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752357/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part34.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750595/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part35.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750756/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part36.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104750897/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part37.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751014/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part38.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751174/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part39.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751389/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part40.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751569/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part41.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104751877/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part42.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752018/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part43.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752139/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part44.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752297/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part45.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104752326/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica.part46.rar

  46. kkash
    April 5th, 2008 | 13:47
  47. Jimbob
    April 5th, 2008 | 13:51

    Luckily there’s going to be a sequel to this, because the end wasn’t satisfying to me.

  48. MAXp0wr
    April 5th, 2008 | 13:54

    This movie was horrible.
    The special effects were good but everything else was poor.

  49. dj
    April 5th, 2008 | 14:01

    WHY ALL THE FUSS ITS ONLY CLOVERFLIELD?????????

  50. Twitch
    April 5th, 2008 | 14:16

    DIAMOND release was pretty much perfect for a 1CD. But now most people have broadband, home cinema sound, and big screen TVs, I think the majority would always prefer a 2CD.

    It’d be good to see rlslog posting a lot more of the 2CD internals like these two excellent releases from DEVICE.

    Or what about the scene groups uploading one of each so people can just choose the one they prefer. Have never understood why they don’t do that. My understanding is that it wouldn’t be breaking any rules.

    Until then, more internals please! :-)

  51. dam
    April 5th, 2008 | 14:20

    @Marceli

    Remember me?

    Seeing as though I slagged you off for a bad post, it’s only right that I congratulate you on a good post!

    So well done!

    It’s these helpful posts I come here for.

  52. Cloverated
    April 5th, 2008 | 14:21

    is this rip better sound quality than the Diamond rip. yes or no. I dont want specs or commentary, just a yes or a no. Is it worth it or not. Yes or no. Please, anyone….

  53. dam
    April 5th, 2008 | 14:25

    And as for 2 cds vs 1 cd.

    1 CD was fine when I had my PC connected upto a standard TV but now that I have my PC connected upto a nice HDTV, the low quality on 1 CD releases is very noticable.

    Especially on films such as this when the majority of the film is dark, it becomes very pixelated.

  54. Twitch
    April 5th, 2008 | 14:29

    @Zen

    You seem to be a man in the know. Any chance of sorting something out with rlslog, so that they can keep us informed of the scene AC3 releases we should know about?

  55. rick5446
    April 5th, 2008 | 14:47

    DVD Rip … MILAGRO_BEANFIELD_WAR.avi
    http://www.adrive.com/public/2211e443e89350995d0a8418af913f94d8f2bb515f52b743d6fa0c6bc2b6ab3d.html

    Heres a little older Movie that a few of U Might enjoy..
    I highly recommend that U D/L as U will not find this anywhere
    I have it in English, French, Espanol
    E-Mail me if U want it in another Language..I’ll upload & send to U
    rick5446*hotmail.com

  56. cirithungol
    April 5th, 2008 | 14:59
  57. Tom
    April 5th, 2008 | 14:59

    Too, Marceli has removed “DEViSE-C_N-joi.rar”.
    I missed this file for complete download, sad …

  58. Sample?
    April 5th, 2008 | 15:07

    @134 hi-jinx

    Yes it is possible, yes they are faking 5.1

    If this release came out after Replica pre, then this lame group would have stole audio from that release. That didn’t happen. So using logical powers of deduction what occurred?

    1. steal scene release
    2. Demux the audio from video
    3. run it through an audio software suite
    4. clone stereo channels
    7. filter
    5. save as AC3
    6. you have fake 5.1
    7. mux with re-encoded video from stolen scene release
    8. package, seed to lame ftp or torrent site, add to public pre channel
    9. watch people on RLSLOG marvel at lame group

  59. bmad
    April 5th, 2008 | 15:12

    netload links please!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  60. operil
    April 5th, 2008 | 15:13
  61. Rob
    April 5th, 2008 | 15:16

    the movie is only 1hour 10 mins.
    you do not need 2Cds. 700mb is enough

    use your head people.

  62. nine inch richards
    April 5th, 2008 | 15:17

    The sound actually seems worse :/

    (at least with the mp3 sound I could tweak the equalizer to get decent levels)

  63. bernd
    April 5th, 2008 | 15:27

    @164 thanks for the link

  64. Buback
    April 5th, 2008 | 15:36

    Big thx guys, great job :D

  65. SLAPSTRUMENTALS.TK
    April 5th, 2008 | 15:41

    this isnt really any better than dmds plus why even bother with these when the DVDR is out.

    alt endings bonus features and such…

  66. YahooEU
    April 5th, 2008 | 16:05

    After 170 comments there is no actual links to download. Because @1 – DELETED, @131 and @142 (the same) 1st RAR is corrupted. Anfor- tunatly I don’t,t now how open @135 x264-files. My VLS can,t play it. Now, is there actually proper links to this release, because it dose not exist on UseNet

  67. TayZonday
    April 5th, 2008 | 16:20

    Cloverfield.2008.DVDRip.XviD.AC3-mallat on usenet

    http://www.newzleech.com/usenet/?p=4294919

    Cloverfield (2008)
    http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1060277/

    XviD 576×320 ~1212 kbps 23.976 fps
    AC3 5.1 448 kbps
    994 mb

  68. Amy
    April 5th, 2008 | 16:37

    I hate this movie. I enjoy watching Nick and Jessica $ex tape more than this crappy movie. Is tuna made of chicken ??? :D

  69. josh
    April 5th, 2008 | 16:41

    this movie was the worst movie i have ever seen

  70. Marc
    April 5th, 2008 | 17:12

    Geesh, diamond’s reputation used to be rock solid but recently they are releasing 700mb files even for films that last nearly 2 hours and getting complaints, whats up with that ?? i’ll be getting this from newrartriot @ mininova.

  71. Ultimate Warrior
    April 5th, 2008 | 17:16

    @162 – sample?

    hey dumb#ss. i see you are making up stuff about this release being a reencode of the diamond release. man u are well stupid. the replica DVDR came out about 2 hrs after the diamond dvdrip so this release is more than likely from the replica DVDR source.

    now let me ask u this cuz u seem to be a scene guru with an obvious disdain for any1 involved in the non conforming world of iNTERNAL. wat does it matter if this dvdrip is from the replica DVDR? even if the video and audio are slightly compressed on the replica DVDR, which replica state they are not, wat does it matter?

    i dont know why people get so bent out of shape about it. wat is the difference between encoding a movie from a slightly compressed DVD5 source to a 1.36 GB xvid file than encoding it from an untouched DVD9 source to a 1.36 GB xvid file?

    ANSWER ME THAT SAMPLE?

    in both cases the video has to be compressed to 1.36 GB so wat does it matter if the DVD5 source is already slightly compressed? if anything wouldn’t it just make encoding the movie file to xvid quicker as some of the compression process has already taken place. its not like the DVD5 and DVD9 sources are being compressed the same, as the slightly better quality of the DVD9 source is going to have to be compressed more than the DVD5 source, thus resulting in both xvid files being the same quality.

    i can understand if you want to b#tch about the difference in quality between DVD5 and DVD9 if DVDR’s are what you collect. but i really don’t get why it is an issue whether the source used for an xvid file is a DVD5 or DVD9.

    EXPLAIN SAMPLE? TEACH US YOUR KNOWLEDGE. ENLIGHTEN OUR PATHETIC LIFES.

    shhhhhhhhhhhh……….the guru is about to speak………

  72. Marc
    April 5th, 2008 | 17:19

    I meant Newartriot on Mininova, sorry !
    heres the link, http://www.mininova.org/search/?search=newartriot
    always good quality there.

  73. Unbreakable /Bmore
    April 5th, 2008 | 17:19

    @90

    You assume to much.

  74. cloverboy
    April 5th, 2008 | 17:22

    why did the diamond suck, it was perfect? and how does the dvdr-replica look like, inth the nfo it said it had extra features, like the alternate ending i want it now

  75. deezNuts
    April 5th, 2008 | 17:30
  76. alex
    April 5th, 2008 | 17:57

    can someone please supply the netload links or something similar? not rapidshare as there are too many parts-please! i hate torrents man…..also 179 – thats the diamond release you have supplied at sharedzilla as its only 700mb

  77. bitroad
    April 5th, 2008 | 18:06

    any bitroad links?

  78. manocomin
    April 5th, 2008 | 18:11

    Anybody have links in BitRoad or TransferBigFiles?

  79. Gstn
    April 5th, 2008 | 18:27
  80. jean
    April 5th, 2008 | 18:49

    great movie

  81. Warning
    April 5th, 2008 | 19:09

    I’m not trying to be rude here, but how come there are 600 seeds and almost 6000 peers on this torrent, yet download speed is not going above 30 kBytes/sec ???

    Something’s fishy here.
    It almost seems as if all peers are on dial-up or something. Pretty bad..

    I get 1.8 MegaBytes/sec from tvtorrents with only 20 seeds and 10 peers. And yes, on the same client, same connection, right now as we speak.

  82. uploader123
    April 5th, 2008 | 19:11
  83. anan
    April 5th, 2008 | 19:35

    heres the Cloverfield DVDRip XviD AC3 iNT-DEViSE subs in english

    http://rapidshare.com/files/105125999/139341.rar

  84. kkash
    April 5th, 2008 | 19:46

    All I know is the replica dvd has all of the features of a retail dvd so what ever i’d take that over an avi save me the trouble of converting it to s dvd.

  85. morad
    April 5th, 2008 | 19:54

    You people keep complaing, although some of you seem not to know anything about quality. I downloaded both releases, and:

    1CD – great picture (lower resolution though), decent mp3 sound; great overall as for 1CD
    2CD – better sound (higher bit rate, as usually with Dolby Digital, may sound quieter when stereo output chosen), the picture is only decent – the colours are worse than in 1CD release, very good resolution (the way it always should be, for 2CD releases)

    The choice is yours.
    I enjoyed the film. Regards.

  86. BLAD3
    April 5th, 2008 | 20:26

    What an astonishingly crappy movie.

  87. rocker
    April 5th, 2008 | 20:33

    watched diamonds release last night.i thought it was an excellent copy and a gripping film.am downloading replicas now aswell.ive got no problem with 1cd or 2cd release as long as the sound is in sync and picture quality is good.i rarely put my surround sound on anyway cause the sound becomes too loud for neighbors.if theyve got theirs on i know it and it does annoy when u cant hear your own tv over their sounds-especially in summer when everyone has their windows open

  88. Ka0
    April 5th, 2008 | 20:34

    @87

    couldn’t of said it better myself.

    :)

  89. BadRobot
    April 5th, 2008 | 20:47

    @48

    Bad Robot is JJ Abrams production company. You will see this logo on Alias, LOST and a few other productions that involve JJ Abrams.

  90. Termin4T0R
    April 5th, 2008 | 21:12

    Abrams also did X-Files. So people were hyping this thing because of his past. People reading into clues that he ws leaving what the monster would look like and if he would of actually show the monster at all because of all the secrets starting in July of last year. JJ is known for screwing with peoples minds with Lost and thats what fueled this beast.
    He wanted this to be America’s MOnster Movie but he didn’t pull it off in my opition, just popcorn fodder. Thats all

  91. Mr Hex
    April 5th, 2008 | 21:27

    Finally! Thanks for sharing

  92. e3m88
    April 5th, 2008 | 21:59

    not a scene release!

  93. MelC
    April 5th, 2008 | 22:08

    ultimate warrior – it’s pretty obvious why you don’t transcode from a dvd-5 (thats been transcoded from dvd-9 already) to divx. for anyone but a blindman the quality loss is unacceptable.

    I’d imagine this release is from the REP dvd-r which they claim is untouched video so it’s not an issue (except for the stolen source of course, but I doubt the p2p monkeys in devise care about that).

    The video bitrate of the DMD release was so-so – typical sh-itty divx, but the audio was atrocious; mp3 for an action movie? makes absolutely no sense. I watched the REP DVD-R. The movie was awful but at least the audio and video quality were upto par. =]

  94. MelC
    April 5th, 2008 | 22:10

    Third tries a charm….

    ultimate warrior – it’s pretty obvious why you don’t transcode from a dvd-5 (thats been transcoded from dvd-9 already) to divx. for anyone but a blindman the quality loss is unacceptable.

    I’d imagine this release is from the REP dvd-r which they claim is untouched video so it’s not an issue (except for the stolen source of course, but I doubt the p2p monkeys in devise care about that).

    The video bitrate of the DMD release was so-so – typical sh-itty divx, but the audio was atrocious; mp3 for an action movie? makes absolutely no sense. I watched the REP DVD-R. The movie was awful but at least the audio and video quality were upto par. =]

  95. pongo
    April 5th, 2008 | 22:23

    #146 kkash – what is the password??

  96. Smooth
    April 5th, 2008 | 22:26

    DiAMOND did good jobb with the release…
    Looked good on my 46″ HDtv.. 2cd’s are overkill!

    1970kbps for a Xvid??? HAHA!
    They should have used x264 if they need quality…

  97. fluffy
    April 5th, 2008 | 22:40

    Awesome.. 5.1 sound was fantastic! This movie really gave the sub a workout! :D

    Highly recommended over the 2ch diamond release.

  98. Gstn
    April 5th, 2008 | 22:59
  99. kek
    April 5th, 2008 | 23:06

    Why does hardly anyone mention the higher resolution on the DEViSE release (i like to call it “Full SD” as they use the maximum available horizontal resolution)??

    It’s 624×352 vs 720×416 guys! Why should i not go for the higher resolution AND higher bitrate?

  100. Hugo
    April 5th, 2008 | 23:36

    THE WORST MOVIE I EVER SAW!!!!!!!!!!

    I lost 2 hours of my life watching this stupid movie…

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 » Show All

Leave a reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Hot info about new scene releases!