Releaselog

Cloverfield DVDRip XviD AC3 iNT-DEViSE

Posted on 05.04.2008 at 03:57 in DVDRiP, Movies by Marceli

A lot of you have complained about the low quality of the DiAMOND DVDRip of this movie, but thanks to DEViSE we now have the internal release. There has been a lot of talk about an HD version coming up, and to tell you the truth I have no clue whether there will be one, but this is the best we have now (except for the DVDR).

Quality: Since this movie is rather short the bitrate on this one is a whopping 1970kbps with a res of 720×416 :D AC3 5.1 audio is included as always, and although there aren’t any subs, use the ones from the DiAMOND release.

Cloverfield follows five New Yorkers from the perspective of hand held video camera. The movie is exactly the length of a DV Tape and a sub-plot is established by showing bits and pieces of video previously recorded on the tape that is being recorded over. The movie starts as a monster of unknown origin destroys a building. As they go to investigate, parts of the building and the head of the Statue of Liberty come raining down. The movie follows their adventure trying to escape and save a friend, a love interest of the main character.

Genre: Action / Mystery / Sci-Fi / Thriller
Ratings: IMDB 7.8/10 (59,581 votes) RT 76%
Directed by: Matt Reeves
Starring: Lizzy Caplan, Jessica Lucas, T.J. Miller, Michael Stahl-David, Mike Vogel

Release Name: Cloverfield.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.iNT-DEViSE
Size: 2CD, 1.37GB
Video Quality: DVDRip, XViD, 720×416, 1970kbps, 23.976 FPS
Audio Quality: AC3 5.1, 448kbps
Runtime: 85 minutes
Filename: devise-cloverfield.cd1, devise-cloverfield.cd2

Links: IMDB, Homepage, Trailer
NFO: here
Torrent: NewTorrents
NZB: Newzleech Search
Posters: 1183×1600, 1298×1500, 1100×1645

* Comments(265)

Comments (265)

Feel free to post your Cloverfield DVDRip XviD AC3 iNT-DEViSE torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All
  1. bernd
    April 5th, 2008 | 03:58

    I heard a lot about this one and never got a single glance. Many thanks from Germany Marceli!

  2. Marceli staff member
    April 5th, 2008 | 03:59

    http://rapidshare.com/files/104906865/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r00
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104906995/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r01
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104907141/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r02
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104907297/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r03
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104907413/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r04
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104907535/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r05
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104907631/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r06
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104907855/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r07
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104908026/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r08
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104908183/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r09
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104908345/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r10
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104908500/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r11
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104908706/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r12
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104908871/DEViSE-C_N-joi.r13
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104909181/DEViSE-C_N-joi.rar

  3. brillboy
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:00

    rapidshare links?

  4. brillboy
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:01

    never mind

  5. Acer~Aspire
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:03

    Hey Marcelli…u stole those links from me?

  6. Termin4T0R
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:04

    ScreenShot near the end. WTF?
    http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn99/killernab/weird.jpg

  7. @lex
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:04

    What was wrong with the quality? I thought it was fine. I think the movie was intended to look the way it does because it was filmed using a home camera.

  8. Mike
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:05

    I’m so glad I waited to download this movie! The DiAMOND DVDRip gave it no justice with such crappy quality!

  9. Marceli staff member
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:06

    @7

    LOL? First off the movie was filmed with pro equipment but they just made it seem like it wasn’t as the quality would be crap if it was an actual hand cam. Second of all I was talking about the quality of the release which DiAMOND kind of messed up.

  10. Cool
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:07

    Does Anyone Have any news on a release date for One missed Call/ Rouge or Untraceable Dvdrip or R5

  11. Acer~Aspire
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:08

    One Missed Call next week, Untraceable within 2-3 weeks

  12. moxin
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:11

    the quality on the diamond release wasn’t good??..jeebas..what r people looking at it thru??..i thought it was perfect!..
    and all the whining about the movie being crappy..i thought it was awesome!..i was on the edge of my seat the whole time..and it’s not easy to impress me…

  13. Marceli staff member
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:11

    @11

    I can count too, the last guy that “predicted” these releases was wrong about quite a few of them so…

  14. hyp0xia
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:11

    just finished watching this.. got the replica dvdr.. good to see ac3 on a divx!

    great movie.. highly recommended

    cheers!

  15. johnclark
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:13

    damn, Diamond is loosing their touch.

  16. johnclark
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:13

    DiAmond sucks!!!

  17. johnclark
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:14

    What is Diamond doing. Damn!!!!

  18. Wolfin
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:15

    http://torrents.thepiratebay.org/4116780/Cloverfield.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.iNT-DEViSE.4116780.TPB.torrent

  19. Jeje
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:17

    Sh**T just downloaded previous version…

  20. Mr.Ceeeeee
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:18

    dam you, i just downloaded and watched the other rls lmao

  21. Delaware
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:18

    Diamond release ROCKS.

    F you all 2-CD whiners.

  22. dodgygeezer
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:20

    I downloaded the diamond version and thought it was perfectly alright.

  23. Ultimate Warrior
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:21

    how exactly do you work out the video bitrate of a video file? like how do you know the bitrate of this video is 1970kbps?

  24. Acer~Aspire
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:23

    they set their own bitrate …the ones who release it

  25. Mr.Ceeeeee
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:23

    @Termin4T0R
    “ScreenShot near the end. WTF?
    http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn99/killernab/weird.jpg”

    its what was on his tape… but seeing as the other clips wer from his day out with his x i dunno… hmmmmm

  26. johnclark
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:30

    @13 And who r u talking about?

  27. CrudE
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:32

    @21 of course quality doesnt matter when ur watchin it on your little computer monitor. but watching it on TV makes a huge difference….

  28. on fire
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:40

    stfu all of you. The diamond rls was fine on tv on my 42”. 1.37gb and 2cds for an 85 min film f that

  29. eitanois
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:45

    the dmd rls was fine on my 32″ FULL HD LCD TV.

    I only miss the 5.1 sound.

  30. hobolurkin
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:48

    Anyone have an NZB for this one? Can’t seem to find it on the usual newsgroups.

  31. CrudE
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:49

    DiAMOND rls = sh*t

  32. poolpro
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:51

    worst movie ever….
    save your self the time , quality 10/10

  33. Tom
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:53

    Darn I have just finished watching the Diamond rip right now, and then I see this nice release with AC3 sound, noooo :(

    Yes the Diamond was fine, but guys video is not all, sound is allmost 50% of a movie. But I dont think I wanna download this just to see it again with AC3, one time was enough, still a little dizzy from that shaking hand held camera lol :lol:

  34. Tom
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:56

    @31

    The Diamond was nice video quality, but I agree it should have been a 2 CD Rip with AC3.

    Hope that Diamond begins to put out 2 disc rips again as they did in the past.

  35. steve"O"
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:57

    57″ Toshiba DLP suckas…..and completely fine.

    Will dl any diamond release without hesitation.

  36. Scotty
    April 5th, 2008 | 04:59

    PLEASE SHOW YOUR SUPPORT! JOIN OUR STAGE6 COMMUNITY!
    http://www.stage6forum.com

    Megaupload:
    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=CJAJMLQM
    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=CT3JQYLF
    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=CL55M51R
    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=VWGAI0C0
    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=HLEQ8STK
    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=6VTO8S5D
    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=K5G43RO7

    Rapidshare:
    http://rapidshare.com/files/92639832/cfasd.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/92645033/cfasd.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/92647796/cfasd.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/92642682/cfasd.part4.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/92644881/cfasd.part5.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/92648456/cfasd.part6.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/92647530/cfasd.part7.rar

  37. Mane Azeem
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:01

    Quality was excellent. I watched it this morning. My first view of this flick was as a decent cam and it was like watching an entirely new movie. For the people who compare this movie to Blair Witch…..why? Because a Digital Camera was the primary footage? Isn’t that like 80% of low budget horror flicks anyway? Stop complaining and ruining it for others. Your mothers raised you better…..I hope!
    Once again, thanks for a great release.
    Video quality: 10 out of 10
    Sound quality: 8 out of 10
    Movie rating: 7.5 out of 10 (could have been more focused on the creature), but in a world lacking of good Monster Movies, I’ll take what I can get.
    If you enjoyed this movie, check out the Korean moster flick called “The Host”. ANother excellent moster movie and in some ways much better than Cloverfield.

    Mane Azeem
    http://www.MySPace.com/mixboard

  38. axxo must die
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:05

    diamond release was perfectly fine crap movies like this dont need ac3 or a 2cd release waste of bandwith

  39. Oceanic
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:10

    where is bsg?

  40. Smartass
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:10

    GOD I can not WAIT until a 1080P Release will come out. Since the movie is short it might be 4.5gb hopefully WOOT

  41. DarkLotus
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:12

    For all the people saying diamonds release was fine. Yes it was fine as long as your watching on a small PC monitor.
    900kbps or so starts to look not so great once you get to 22″ or higher.

  42. BATTLESTAR GALACTICA
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:13

    WHEN THE HELL IS THE PREMIERE OF BATTLESTAR GALACTICA GONNA BE POSTED???

  43. emdeesee
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:13

    I just finished watching the diamond release I downloaded days ago. On my 27″ HDTV (which doubles as my PC monitor) it looked and sounded just fine to me.. DVD quality.

    I didn’t expect much from this movie (I waited 3 years to see Blair Witch.. should have waited forever.).. but I was pleasantly surprised.. awesome.

    I’ll be buying a retail copy when it comes out.. yeah.. some of us leeches actually DO that.

  44. Saulo Benigno
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:21

    How we will use the subtitle from the Diamond one ? It’s only one CD against 2 CDs… hmm.. strange ;)

  45. cremator
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:21

    so much for DIAMOND quality… they have gone down hill recently with their 1CD releases. So we can no longer just say good quality with Diamond. Downloader beware!!!!

  46. Bozo the Clown
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:22

    #36 Scotty is a jerk. RS links for TS bootleg of the movie. Thanks buddy. What do you work for the MPAA or something? Last time I download rs off this site.

  47. --LB-->
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:22

    What about axxo version? Its half the size. Shouldnt we all be downloading that one?

  48. emdeesee
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:24

    BTW.. what TV series is it that “Bad Robot” prod comp does? I’m thinking either Jericho or Lost since that’s the only network TV I watch.. but I may have been recalling as far back as X Files.. I don’t know.

  49. Syntax
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:28

    When’s Battlestar Galactica s04e01 going to be uploaded?

  50. Tom
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:30

    Yeah where’s BSG? Can’t find it anywhere yet.

  51. nicknowsky
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:38

    You all act SO CORNY complaining about Diamonds Release what you all are the lowest of the low, YOU have OTHING to do with this stupid myth called “THE SCENE” geal with waht we get and stop acting like ya’ll are some suuper critics and PROS!! Get outside and livea REAL LIFE!!!!!

  52. Joel
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:39

    diamond release is fine.
    You want higher quality please go for the big screen…

  53. Anonymous
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:41

    jake gyllenhaal is the monster!!!!!

  54. Wolfin
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:44

    Diamonds release was great , but look at the resolution on this release, that coupled with the fact this has AC3 audio. This is going to be Awesome.

  55. Mike
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:47

    We should all complain to Diamond to start releasing 2cds again.

  56. Brick Tamland
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:50

    diamonds picture was clear but this one is more!clearer and 5.1 sound too boot I watched both, and this is superior quality.
    I love lamp

  57. john
    April 5th, 2008 | 05:58

    ms link please!!

  58. Darth Arcon
    April 5th, 2008 | 06:03

    Wow…this is positively the worst movie I have seen since Wrong Turn…

    Creativity: 1.5 (yeah…its a movie…)
    Originality: 0 (um…already done before?!)
    Plot: 0 (what was the freakin point?!)
    Ending: -7 (that is actually a generous score…)

    Overall: Sht…

    I cant believe people actually paid to see this movie…Oh, and dont worry about the quality. That is the least of this film’s worry…In my opinion, the only way that DiAMOND could have done this movie any justice is by not releasing it…

  59. BOB
    April 5th, 2008 | 06:11

    The Diamond Release was excellent quality ya it was not quite as good quality as this one, but da it was only 1cd and still very very good quality it would be a waste of time to download this 2cd Release for a movie that is only 1:15 minutes long lol, also this movie was good, but by far was not anything great a bit overrated I would not watch it twice mostlikely! :)

  60. Foxworks
    April 5th, 2008 | 06:12

    @48

    That would be ABCs ALIAS

  61. pgi
    April 5th, 2008 | 06:14

    Wow…this is positively the best movie I have seen since City of God.

  62. Nequa
    April 5th, 2008 | 06:48

    netload links anyone?

  63. WilR
    April 5th, 2008 | 06:54

    The 1 cd from diamond was FINE.

    Those who want something better, wait for the blueray release. You’ll probably whine at the quality of the 2 cd ;)

  64. Zero
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:11

    Gladly ive waited for this version.

  65. cody
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:15

    @6
    @25

    about the screenshot, i just found it today…

    After the helicopter crash, about one hour into the movie, you can see a shot from the classic King Kong movie for about 0.2 seconds. Thought it was pretty funny that they chosed to put it in there.

    Exact time for this little easter egg is 1 hour 6 minutes and 55 seconds.

  66. budi
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:18

    any 1 single click download link guys?

  67. sanoo
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:18

    hey guys, as i know, scene rule is pre on two cds only for movies longer than 110 mins. So if diamond’s release does’t exist, this would be nuked immediately.

  68. sanoo
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:23

    Battlestar Galactica 401-LOL:
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104976328/bsg.0401.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104976372/bsg.0401.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104976347/bsg.0401.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/104976362/bsg.0401.part4.rar
    {OR}
    http://netload.in/dateibeabdcfa3dae55607c4328c4cc6f38e7/bsg.0401.part1.rar.htm
    http://www.files.to/get/228018/9ap4xp2gi0
    http://uploaded.to/file/omihiq/bsg.0401.part3.rar
    http://www.speedshare.org/download.php?id=DA5C09EA3
    {OR}
    http://rapidshare.de/files/39025041/bsg.0401.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.de/files/39025042/bsg.0401.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.de/files/39025040/bsg.0401.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.de/files/39025036/bsg.0401.part4.rar
    {OR}
    http://netload.in/dateieed624a682ad7c7050d7404e13ecfbc8/battlestar.galactica.401.hdtv-lol.avi.htm

  69. jm
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:25

    88 Minutes DVD Rip
    Starring Al Pacino

    U.S. Theatrical Release Date: April 18, 2008

    http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=8ed24a4

    Or

    2 CD

    http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=2340b3a

    http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=9024b5a

    or rapidshare
    2 cd

    http://rapidshare.com/files/100038760/rcdivx-88min-cd1.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100038885/rcdivx-88min-cd1.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100039120/rcdivx-88min-cd1.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100039106/rcdivx-88min-cd1.part4.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100039085/rcdivx-88min-cd1.part5.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100039002/rcdivx-88min-cd1.part6.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100039024/rcdivx-88min-cd1.part7.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100039127/rcdivx-88min-cd2.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100039157/rcdivx-88min-cd2.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100038908/rcdivx-88min-cd2.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100038981/rcdivx-88min-cd2.part4.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100038977/rcdivx-88min-cd2.part5.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100039154/rcdivx-88min-cd2.part6.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/100038931/rcdivx-88min-cd2.part7.rar

  70. A2DAK
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:27

    Runtime: 85 minutes

    whoever says 2cd is needed for this movie needs to be slapped

  71. 01
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:30

    to those who are complaining about the quality,
    why don’t you just buy original dvds instead. can’t you just appreciate someones ripping them for you and getting these downloads for free? you $#@^%$#@^!!!

  72. JoJo
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:30

    ow this 2CD version… nah i prefer 1CD version, Diamond took a good job, though

  73. Edward J. Thompson
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:31

    This is a freakishly great movie!

    OT:
    [b]Battlestar.Galactica.S04E01.HDTV.XviD-LOL.avi is out!![/b]

  74. Zoton2
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:35

    @ sanoo (68):

    I think “iNTERNAL” means it can’t be nuked. Am I right anyone?

  75. CrudE
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:40

    Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica FTW!

  76. johnny
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:44

    1cd Looked good on a 50″ with convertxtodvd. Nothing wrong with dark scenes or shadow pixels. I give it a 10 on video.

  77. Alfa
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:47

    There isn’t a minimum number of minutes it has to be considered 2 CD. It is the rippers choice. But both CD’s have to be filled at least 680 out of 700 MB on each CD. If the ripper can pull it off, then he can choose whether its 1 CD or 2 CD.

  78. Exaltation
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:49

    The movie is so BAD! What a waste of my time! It’s the same thing like with Blair’s Witch Project. All the hype… not worth it.

  79. cremator
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:53

    The 2 CD release is crap too. I’m waiting for the 3 or 4 CD release from VOMIT. That’s where it’s at!!!

  80. igme
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:53

    testing

  81. sanoo
    April 5th, 2008 | 07:59

    @75 – you are right, i was saying about situation, when diamond is not here and this would be without Internal tag.

  82. Joe Public
    April 5th, 2008 | 08:06

    CLOVERFIELD.ISO
    4.35 GB (4,675,837,952 bytes)

    Untouched video.. Gotta go to HD for any better..
    If u can’t dnld it in at least 1hr 30 mins..
    LOL
    :P :)

    btw.. the dmd rip was fine for 1cd..

  83. Unbreakable /Bmore
    April 5th, 2008 | 08:06

    I just finished watching Cloverfield.DVDR.REPLICA and I must say it was very well done. REPLICA did a great job, it looked superb on my 32″ HDTV (for a DVD that is.) I would advise against waisting time with this (DEViSE) release, because the DVDR is great and a better move considering the quality difference. I am a film maker myself (ironic I know) and have seen A LOT of movies that try to imitate the style of filming that this film uses (aka guerilla), although I can’t vouch as to whether or not a STEADYCAM was used during the film…;) Anyways I have to say that this movie was an amazing work of art and I plan on buying the BLU-RAY when it is released in stores. I highly recommend this movie….along with the implementation of REPLICAS’S DVDR :)

    *There are DVDR links in DiAMONDS release comments page #3*
    -and-
    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4115486/Cloverfield.DVDR-Replica

    -Unbreakable /Bmore

  84. ed123
    April 5th, 2008 | 08:11

    please a video smaple for this

  85. Grahf
    April 5th, 2008 | 08:23

    Is the axxo release better than Diamond in pictue quality? It has AC3 on a 700 Mb file.

  86. NoVaDJ
    April 5th, 2008 | 08:32

    This is a great movie and I can’t wait to see the real DVD release with the alternate endings. Most people don’t seem to understand that this is not a normal movie that explains everything. It’s just 88 min of part of a disaster that was filmed by people not knowing what was really happening to them. I don’t get why people can’t understand that and keep complaining about shaky camera work and a weird ending and no explanations. That’s life! The picture is supposed to be clear because it was filmed with a Sony HD camera and made to look like it was a small cam. When you see the monster and the other things happening through the cam eye they look like they are really happening…at least to me they did and I found the movie very thrilling and frightening. Don’t look for explanations, just enjoy it for what it is…

  87. Fancy
    April 5th, 2008 | 08:32

    Hey Guys, got anyone Netload links for this release? thx

  88. Wankstar
    April 5th, 2008 | 08:37

    *Goes into japanees voice* GOZILLAAAA!

  89. Sample?
    April 5th, 2008 | 08:44

    Giving praise to these re-encode groups just shows how little you people know and makes you look stupid. Yes RLSLOG that includes you. These iNT re-encode groups usually steal a scene xvid release that pred before it, rush to re-encode it, then add their crap to a pre-bot and post internal dupes to some lame ftp or torrent site shortly after.

    If the original scene xvid release didn’t have ac3, then the int doesn’t have true AC3 source either. It’s only been transcoded from stereo vbr mp3 to AC3. It’s not real AC3.

    Also for the morons that praise Replica and shun Diamond, wake up call they’re the same family.

  90. charlieoke
    April 5th, 2008 | 08:45

    diamond release is fine. wise not to waste a quality 2cd rip on this crap.

  91. Elliot Bridgewater
    April 5th, 2008 | 08:54

    @90 – So you’re saying they just ‘upscaled’ the 1 CD DiAMOND release?

  92. Bleez staff member
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:02

    Saw the DiAMOND release, liked it.

  93. Sample?
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:04

    Do you think some no no name torrent group is going to have pre-retail sources? Of course not.

    Usually they steal the preceding scene xvid release and re-encode, then add fake AC3. Sometimes these lame int xvid groups will wait until the scene DVDR is released (which has usually seen compression with CCE)and then re-encode that, but usually not.

    Regardless, they’re taking credit off of someone else’s work without developing their own sources.

  94. Edward J. Thompson
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:05

    @sample
    quit trolling dumbass

  95. Mike staff member
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:09

    ill wait for HD

  96. Ghars
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:11

    this movie sucked! Rec. was way better!

  97. Sample?
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:13

    @95 There’s a difference between trolling and correcting public stupidity. I’ve done the latter. Being a Dumbass is giving credit where credit is not due.

  98. Sample?
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:15

    @96 You’ll be waiting until mid to late summer, maybe longer.

  99. Edward J. Thompson
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:15

    trolling or not, you’re still a dumbass

  100. Alfa
    April 5th, 2008 | 09:22

    Cloverfield: The Ending coming Jan 2009

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Leave a reply