Releaselog

Cloverfield TS XViD-OBSESSiON

Posted on 24.01.2008 at 00:07 in Movies, Telesync by Shiny

Group OBSESSiON comes out of the dark scene underground to quickly release the first scene version of the highly anticipated Cloverfield. Most of you know about this monster movie and if you don’t i cant help cause i don’t either all i know is people have asking for it left right and centre. The Release is a Telesync meaning that it has been recorded with a handheld camera at the cinema so its not great quality, but is what most would call “watchable”. Although it has got dupe frames so it will seem like the image is running a little slow. Audio is better and comes from a direct source so although far from perfect it will do the job just fine. If you cant wait for anything better leech, unrar, smoke up, watch and enjoy! Have a look at the NFO as well, its quite a good one.

Synopsis: Five young New Yorkers throw their friend a going-away party the night that a monster the size of a skyscraper descends upon the city. Told from the point of view of their video camera, the film is a document of their attempt to survive the most surreal, horrifying event of their lives.

Genre: Action / Sci-Fi / Thriller
Ratings: IMDB: 8.1/10 (21,222 votes), RT: 75% (137 Reviews)
Directed by: Matt Reeves
Starring: Michael Stahl-David, Mike Vogel, Odette Yustman, Lizzy Caplan, JessicaLucas, T. J. Miller

Release Name: Cloverfield.TS.XViD-OBSESSiON
Size: 1 CD, 702.24 MB
Quality: Telesync
Runtime: 85 Min’s
Filename: obses-cloverfield

Links: IMDB, RT, Homepage, Trailer
Samples: #1, #2, #3, Thumbs, Video
NFO: Here
Torrent: NewTorrents

* Comments(190)

Comments (190)

Feel free to post your Cloverfield TS XViD-OBSESSiON torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: « 1 [2] Show All
  1. BiG-A
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:03

    http://rapidshare.com/files/86114681/clv_part_01.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86114706/clv_part_02.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86114662/clv_part_03.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86114664/clv_part_04.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86114693/clv_part_05.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86114660/clv_part_06.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86114663/clv_part_07.rar

    enjoy!!

  2. silencer51
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:03

    Does anyone else find it ironic that we have here a TS of a movie that’s been shot with a handheld camera in the first place???

  3. ccvichy
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:13

    “The Release is a Telesync meaning that it has been recorded with a handheld camera at the cinema so its not great quality”. Please at least give the full info and comment on the quality of the specific release. Just because it is recorded with a cam does not mean poor quality. The TS (telesync) means direct sound. For those who do not know, here are the basics about the source of the releases.

    Sources

    CAM -
    A cam is a theater rip usually done with a digital video camera. A mini tripod is sometimes used, but a lot of the time this wont be possible, so the camera make shake. Also seating placement isn’t always idle, and it might be filmed from an angle. If cropped properly, this is hard to tell unless there’s text on the screen, but a lot of times these are left with triangular borders on the top and bottom of the screen. Sound is taken from the onboard microphone of the camera, and especially in comedies, laughter can often be heard during the film. Due to these factors picture and sound quality are usually quite poor, but sometimes we’re lucky, and the theater will be fairly empty and a fairly clear signal will be heard.

    TELESYNC (TS) –
    A telesync is the same spec as a CAM except it uses an external audio source (most likely an audio jack in the chair for hard of hearing people). A direct audio source does not ensure a good quality audio source, as a lot of background noise can interfere. A lot of the times a telesync is filmed in an empty cinema or from the projection booth with a professional camera, giving a better picture quality. Quality ranges drastically, check the sample before downloading the full release. A high percentage of Telesyncs are CAMs that have been mislabeled.

    TELECINE (TC) -
    A telecine machine copies the film digitally from the reels. Sound and picture should be very good, but due to the equipment involved and cost telecines are fairly uncommon. Generally the film will be in correct aspect ratio, although 4:3 telecines have existed. A great example is the JURASSIC PARK 3 TC done last year. TC should not be confused with TimeCode , which is a visible counter on screen throughout the film.

    SCREENER (SCR) -
    A pre VHS tape, sent to rental stores, and various other places for promotional use. A screener is supplied on a VHS tape, and is usually in a 4:3 (full screen) a/r, although letterboxed screeners are sometimes found. The main draw back is a “ticker” (a message that scrolls past at the bottom of the screen, with the copyright and anti-copy telephone number). Also, if the tape contains any serial numbers, or any other markings that could lead to the source of the tape, these will have to be blocked, usually with a black mark over the section. This is sometimes only for a few seconds, but unfortunately on some copies this will last for the entire film, and some can be quite big. Depending on the equipment used, screener quality can range from excellent if done from a MASTER copy, to very poor if done on an old VHS recorder thru poor capture equipment on a copied tape. Most screeners are transferred to VCD, but a few attempts at SVCD have occurred, some looking better than others.

    DVD-SCREENER (DVDscr) -
    Same premise as a screener, but transferred off a DVD. Usually letterbox , but without the extras that a DVD retail would contain. The ticker is not usually in the black bars, and will disrupt the viewing. If the ripper has any skill, a DVDscr should be very good. Usually transferred to SVCD or DivX/XviD.

    DVDRip -
    A copy of the final released DVD. If possible this is released PRE retail (for example, Star Wars episode 2) again, should be excellent quality. DVDrips are released in SVCD and DivX/XviD.

    VHSRip -
    Transferred off a retail VHS, mainly skating/sports videos and XXX releases.

    TVRip -
    TV episode that is either from Network (capped using digital cable/satellite boxes are preferable) or PRE-AIR from satellite feeds sending the program around to networks a few days earlier (do not contain “dogs” but sometimes have flickers etc) Some programs such as WWF Raw Is War contain extra parts, and the “dark matches” and camera/commentary tests are included on the rips. PDTV is capped from a digital TV PCI card, generally giving the best results, and groups tend to release in SVCD for these. VCD/SVCD/DivX/XviD rips are all supported by the TV scene.

    WORKPRINT (WP) -
    A workprint is a copy of the film that has not been finished. It can be missing scenes, music, and quality can range from excellent to very poor. Some WPs are very different from the final print (Men In Black is missing all the aliens, and has actors in their places) and others can contain extra scenes (Jay and Silent Bob) . WPs can be nice additions to the collection once a good quality final has been obtained.

    Hope this is helpful for some.

  4. Heath ledger RIP
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:13

    http://rapidshare.com/files/85617790/156_-_Vista_Wallpapers.rar.html

    great wallpapers

    bad quality will wait for better

  5. alk
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:16

    ty tito for your links

  6. Kenster
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:24

    I gotta say those screenshots aren’t vey helpful.

  7. melo
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:25

    Here’s The link:

    http://rapidshare.com/files/86118514/clove.part.01.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86118517/clove.part.02.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86118537/clove.part.03.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86118521/clove.part.04.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86118522/clove.part.05.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86118559/clove.part.06.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86118520/clove.part.07.rar

    enjoy

  8. Cap'n Chronic
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:27

    Wathced the samples and am downloading it now… Quality is very good. It just looks sorta shytty because the movie is like the Blair witch project, supposed to be recorded on home cams.

  9. Danny
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:36

    @86 i am wondering the same thing, it seems to be relevant to the JAws cam version.

  10. randomer
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:36

    [NUKE] [ XVID ] [ Cloverfield.TS.XViD-OBSESSiON ][ No.ivtc ] \

    confirm?

  11. John
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:41

    Hey guys, can you answer my question quickly? Is this better than the Jaws release?

  12. xtazy
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:42

    excellent film… well worth a watch belive… although this copy isn’t great quality so i’d say wait till a dvd scr comes out or dvd rip

  13. farting gary
    January 24th, 2008 | 02:50

    I like cheese and most flavors of pudding. Sometimes it is nice to go for a long swim. Tom Hamilton is the voice of the Indians. For my money, there just is not enough choice in pizzerias in this town. When you drink juice, it makes you pee. Walt Disney once told me,”stop picking at it.” I operate a small chain of chimney sweep shops outside of Derby.

  14. melo
    January 24th, 2008 | 03:03

    Here’s another link for you:

    CD1:
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123182/taojesse.cd1.part.01.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123184/taojesse.cd1.part.02.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123204/taojesse.cd1.part.03.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123192/taojesse.cd1.part.04.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123222/taojesse.cd1.part.05.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123211/taojesse.cd1.part.06.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123229/taojesse.cd1.part.07.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86122918/taojesse.cd1.part.08.rar

    CD2:
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123199/taojesse.cd2.part.01.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123197/taojesse.cd2.part.02.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123201/taojesse.cd2.part.03.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123200/taojesse.cd2.part.04.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123202/taojesse.cd2.part.05.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123205/taojesse.cd2.part.06.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86123220/taojesse.cd2.part.07.rar

    enjoy! :D

  15. melo
    January 24th, 2008 | 03:05

    opss sorry wrong post guyz…
    that’s for jesse james…

    sorry

  16. !
    January 24th, 2008 | 03:09

    Checkout my rlslog entry, pretty good eh?

    http://i32.tinypic.com/2e2e43t.jpg

  17. rushn1
    January 24th, 2008 | 03:10

    HA HA HA-Shiny said SMOKE UP !-HA HA HA!!!THX keep em coming!!

  18. R e l e a s e l o g
    January 24th, 2008 | 03:18

    if u like this movie try also “Monster”

  19. Coza
    January 24th, 2008 | 03:44

    Define irony: a movie that was filmed with a handheld camera being filmed in the cinema with a handheld camera.

  20. nasferatu
    January 24th, 2008 | 03:47

    DL’d it, watched it….
    quality could be better, but given the nature of how the movie was shot (seen through the lens of a cam) I can’t complain. I’ll prolly let someone dish out the cash for me to see it. kept me on the edge of my seat, that’s for sure.

  21. poobum
    January 24th, 2008 | 03:53

    Hmm… watching a movie recorded with a handheld recorded with a handheld. Trippy.

  22. Dan
    January 24th, 2008 | 04:16

    Glad to see you have no idea what you’re talking about…

    A Telesync is not a cam, it’s a release that’s been captured using a Telecine machine, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecine

  23. !
    January 24th, 2008 | 04:20

    2008-01-23 Gone.Baby.Gone.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND

    someobdy block lizes ip adress taht b*tch keeps spammings about anime!

  24. TBGgrouppie
    January 24th, 2008 | 04:22

    @ 131
    LOL, you made my day. Read it yourself.
    Anyone know if this flick is on a award screening list or something?

  25. CajuCLC
    January 24th, 2008 | 04:25

    Anyone got english subs????
    thanks

  26. tessk
    January 24th, 2008 | 04:38

    “Define irony: a movie that was filmed with a handheld camera being filmed in the cinema with a handheld camera.”

    ROFL

  27. jimmymac
    January 24th, 2008 | 04:47

    I would wait for a screener, R5, dvdrip, etc I really dont recommend watching this version. Its a movie shot with video cameras and well it really shows that this is a telesync. imo

  28. Dober
    January 24th, 2008 | 05:00

    And I use the term “cam” loosely as to not spark another Telecine version Cam session. What it boils down to is that it is re-recorded.

  29. NoVaDJ
    January 24th, 2008 | 05:11

    Saw this at the theater and it was awesome, but some of you are confused as to what the quality is supposed to look like. It’s supposed to be filmed by a camcorder, but it is crystal clear in the theater. It just has a lot of shaking effects as the person holding the cam was running or attacked. This seems to have bothered a lot of people especially if they sat close to the screen. I wasn’t affected by it because I sat farther back.The pic is not supposed to be blurry or bad as the samples show. I would wait for a better copy so the great special effects can be appreciated.

  30. TBGgrouppie
    January 24th, 2008 | 05:14

    @ 139 NoVaDJ
    This info is very usefull. Thx bigtime. Will wait for sure now I know this. Might see it in theatre, if me lady dares to, and, if not..

    Anyone know if this flick is on a award screening list or something?

  31. Smith Alana
    January 24th, 2008 | 05:16

    Cloverfield Ending Credits – Spoilers
    Cloverfield Ending Credits – Spoilers
    Cloverfield Ending Credits – Spoilers

    *Spoilers*

    At the credits ending of Cloverfield, *spoilers* the audio from the video cam says, “Help us!”. But when played backwards, it says, “It’s still alive!” This happens after the end credits of Cloverfield. Assuming the speaker was Rob, he suggests Cloverfield (the monster) is still alive. This also suggests a sequel for Cloverfield 2! *Spoilers*

    The Japanese oil company TAGRUATO drops a satellite (Chimpanz III) into the ocean as part of viral marketing (shown at the end of the movie when Rob and Beth were on the ferris wheel). TAGRUATO works with SLUSHO (a slush company), as the main ingredient for SLUSHO is found at the satellite dropzone (deep ocean). While searching for satellite and ingredients, they woke Cloverfield (the monster).

    People who were at the party in the beginning of the movie, were seen wearing SLUSHO shirts. Rob apparently was going to be the Vice President of TAGRUATO in Japan.

    The main ingredient of Slusho apparently turns a tiny fish into a HUGE whale in Ganu’s (he found the nectar) dream, which explains the size of Cloverfield. *Update* The main ingredient is a deep sea nectar.

    *Update* Because the ingredient was discovered on the deep ocean floor, under amazing pressure and in the most extreme cold, Ganu knew he had to serve the ingredient in a near frozen state to preserve its freshness. Thus the idea of Slush (Slusho)!

    For animals/fishes/insects to survive in the deepest ocean (very high boiling temperature), they naturally have very high heat resistance. This explains how Cloverfield is able to withstand numerous bombs and attacks from the army.

    Cloverfield refers to the field formerly known as Central Park. Clovers are usually prone to grow at places after bombing. Thus the term “Clover” and “field” referring to park.

    *Update* Slusho is a very addictive drink, with signs of steroid drug like effects. Makes people stronger, constantly happy, have happy dreams and finally… “SLUSHO makes my stomach explode with happy!!” (Remember Marlena’s stomach?)

    Taken directly from: http://www.cloverfieldendingcredits.com/

  32. L-HO
    January 24th, 2008 | 05:21

    I personally loved this movie. For monster movies its original since not many that I can think of give such an intimate view of the diaster. Most monster movies (Godzilla, King Kong, Jurassic park) give such broad views that (atleast for me) you dont feel unsafe ever… This movie makes you feel unsafe and just as confused and scared as REAL people would probably be in a disaster situation.

  33. sYMbOl
    January 24th, 2008 | 05:44

    I love the beautiful ni66er woman! One in a billion!

  34. II Thousand 3WRX
    January 24th, 2008 | 05:51

    @18 are you kidding? That scenemachine link sounds more like a whiny-endless rule abusing / seed whore torrent site. Ill pass on the register.

    I think this version should be watchable, i dont expect much. I was hyped when the previews started but im not looking forward much to it now.

  35. Valve
    January 24th, 2008 | 05:54

    This movie was shot with a state of the art Sony HD 1080P+ camera, and they did a good job making it look like a handheld cam, which it was NOT shot with

  36. -jr-
    January 24th, 2008 | 06:02

    I think I seen Jay and Silent Bob walk threw this lol

  37. RingbearerNZ
    January 24th, 2008 | 06:29

    If anyone wouldn’t mind, could they rip the audio from the credits cause ROAR! (The Cloverfield Overture) is awesome!

  38. TBGgrouppie
    January 24th, 2008 | 06:53

    @ 147
    Found these:
    http://www.members.shaw.ca/tach94/overture.mp3 (cam audio supposedly)
    http://rapidshare.com/files/85321656/overture.mp3.html
    Hope this helps. ;)

  39. kiac
    January 24th, 2008 | 07:03

    I think i may wait for a 100% quality. This movie has been getting rave reviews from everyone i know, so might go catch it in the cinema.

  40. zorrin
    January 24th, 2008 | 07:13

    This Movie is 98% shot in the Dark of the night, except for the begining few minutes of the party scenes. The samples here are also taken from that particular time. How bright and clear is this version of the movie in the much darker portions of the movie??? or would it be better to wait for the R5 or SCR, or even the DVDRIP of this one??

  41. mp3dude
    January 24th, 2008 | 08:01

    worst movie i ever seen so far i went to a theater and just waste of money dont watch this movie its boring and just a gigantic spider that u cant even see because all time the camera its shaking and man dont waste your time watching this movie trust me

  42. Meh
    January 24th, 2008 | 10:23

    This movie blew ass.. prepare yourself for a wisely advertised piece of crap.

  43. hdfhdfgh
    January 24th, 2008 | 10:48

    OBSESSiON just stole the video from p2p.
    So no *real* scene rls yet.

    Wait until a decent scene group gets a proper source instead of just thieving whatever crap is already out there. Cam video is just not worth it on this one.

  44. hdfhdfgh
    January 24th, 2008 | 11:01

    Cloverfield is just a 75 min trailer. The whole thing feels like it was designed to get people excited so they’d buy cinema tickets, to me it doesn’t feel like anyone intended to write an actual story. I think it was designed from day one as a way to take money from people while giving them as little in return as possible – good business and no doubt they’re all rich (kudos)…but a lousy film, they’re artistically poor, lol.

  45. AlphA
    January 24th, 2008 | 11:13

    Quality = 3/10

    This is not a TS more like a BS ( Bullsh1T )

    Wait for R5 or DVDRIP

  46. Kredes
    January 24th, 2008 | 12:05

    Really poor quality.. its not that worth!

  47. Preacher
    January 24th, 2008 | 14:11

    This movie Sucks!!!!! This is exactly the reason i download movies, because hollywood keep putting out crap like this.

  48. FiOS Kev
    January 24th, 2008 | 14:59

    Steven…post #8.. You’re not getting it bro..a movie filmed with a cam with the special effects!? Abrams did a fantastic job with what looks like a continuous shot with so many special effects…someone said here..go in with an open mind… Can’t believe some people are giving bad reviews! Awesome..Thanks to the uploader! P.S. SEE IT IN THE THEATERS FOR FULL EFFECT! Download to see if you missed anything… later fellas!

  49. think
    January 24th, 2008 | 15:03

    STOP saying that this movie was shot with a handheld camera. IT WASNT!!..

    You got to be a stupid porn chop if you think the quality of this movie matches the quality of your average home video camera. Just because this movie was shot with a professional camera man holding the camera it doesnt mean that they used a rehular 400 dollar camera..

    People need to shut up and enjoy the fact that a great movie was made using an outside of the norm technique.

    And stop complaining about not seeing the monster. THEY SHOW THE MONSTER A LOT.. WHAT ELSE DO YOU WANT. WHAT ELSE SHOULD THE MONSTER HAD DONE?? DID YOU EXPECT IT TO TALK?? YALL SOUND LIKE NOOBS!!! crying about seeing a monster more.. they showed the monster plenty of times from every angle and very very very very close up…

    this movie was a love story / sci fi / thriller. i give it a 9.9 out of 10..

  50. wickido
    January 24th, 2008 | 15:26

    Oh boy… Oh BOY! I’ve been really eager to watch this since last year. The whole idea of a new Godzilla, I mean, the first movie was pretty okay, and then they kept on feeding us with these teaser footage and trailers. I mean, come on, this is probably the best movie in months! :D

    Borat style joke…. NOT!
    So, with all my hopes up, I went watching it. Nothing happens for the first 18 minutes, it’s much like one of your own home videos of some going-away-party, nothing special. Then there starts happening stuff. But wait, most of the time the camera is pointing to the floor or making movies to make you pretty sick. The only part which is cool is when the monster’s (human sized spiderlike) parasites attacks em. The monster itself only covers roughly 5 minutes on-screen action and not even in full glory. The ending is also lame. While the so called story is still going they get nuked by bombs rather then eaten by the monster. Thats why it only runs a poor 73 mins.

    Altogether? Big dissapointment. Besides, releasing a Double CAM(TS) doesn’t help either. You perhaps don’t want to watch it, but ofcourse, you must make up your own mind about that. For me it’s a big whopping NO! ;)

  51. g00nism
    January 24th, 2008 | 15:27

    i thought the nfo was poor, the days of dope ascii artists seems to be gone

  52. wickido
    January 24th, 2008 | 15:43

    @ Dan (#125)
    Er… actually, it seems you’re the one not knowing what he’s talking about. Theres a difference between TS en TC, namely that the ‘S’ is a ‘C’ in the other one (yes, it took me days to figure that one too). So… what you’re saying is: “A Telesync is not a cam, it’s a release that’s been captured using a Telecine machine”. You should have done better homework. TC is TeleCine, therefor indeed captured using the TeleCine method. This release (a TS) TeleSync however is in fact a CAM, but it differs from a CAM because it is not using the CAM Audio, but audio ripped from an external source. This quality doesn’t have any coughing, laughing and crying babies on it. It’s much like the audo you’d find on a R5 release, since that one usually is in a foreign language (other than english) and has a LINE Audio in english put underneath. ;)

  53. SHiCE
    January 24th, 2008 | 17:08

    http://rapidshare.com/files/86260800/Cloverfield.TS.XViD-OBSESSiON.nzb

  54. mcf3778
    January 24th, 2008 | 20:36

    Worst movie of the year nomination… first 18 min’s pointless the rest nap time.. the most hyped movies alwaise are the worst.. Its a bad cam because its a double cam and the producers of this “hell” of a movie should be burnt at the steak, I need to talk to some one that liked this movie in person to see what they were thinking.. even the acting sucked, and you still dont know what was going on after it was all over.. If there is a part 2 I will be killing myself

  55. Ddog666
    January 24th, 2008 | 21:04

    Should’ve read properly otherwise I would have not downloaded. Just another bloody cam. Will be watching this in the cinema at the weekend anyway.

    @106 thanks for the handy definitions

  56. A-Drug-Against-War
    January 24th, 2008 | 21:24

    what would be ironic is a dvdscr with a timer.. lol

  57. dan
    January 24th, 2008 | 22:59

    Hey wickido, that want me that made that idiotic statement about the cam and the machine I have not been home for two days! lol.

    Anyhew, if you get motion sickness easily, then you need to stay away from this film as I can almost guarentee that watching it and being subject to motion sickness, you will end up blowing chunks.

    But then again if you like 7o min of people running around screaming, and 5 min of the actual monster, this film is for you.

  58. gabbie
    January 24th, 2008 | 23:50

    adrive please

  59. er3
    January 24th, 2008 | 23:52

    i still wait
    maybe upload anyone subs :(

  60. NoVaDJ
    January 24th, 2008 | 23:59

    Wait for a good rip. A lot of people who went to see it didn’t know ahead of time what the concept was so they were expecting a straight forward monster flick which this is not. For those prepared this is an awesome movie, one of the best I’ve seen in a long time. I can’t wait to see it again because there is so much too see. It’s not about the monster, it’s about a group of people thrown into a situation where they don’t know what is happening and they are trying to save themselves. That’s the point of the movie, it’s not about the origins of the monster or a happy ending with all the loose ends tied up. It’s just about a going away party where all hell breaks loose and you only see as much as the group sees.

    People expecting Aliens will hate it….

  61. Hunta1
    January 25th, 2008 | 01:15

    Are you people for real? Motion sickness because of a moving camera? Jesus Christ, I’d hate to take a road trip with any of the people complaining… At this point, after all the viral marketing, reviews in the media and trailers on TV, anyone who goes into this movie NOT knowing it is shot from a handheld camera point of view DESERVES to get sick. I saw this movie the day it came out, not a single person in the theater walked out or got sick or verbally objected in any way, shape, or form.

    Motion is a part of life. Get over it you pretentious film snobs and enjoy a refreshingly intimate and realistic piece of cinematic gold.

  62. FreeKeR
    January 25th, 2008 | 01:56

    Cloverfield.DVDSCR.XViD-ACE-CREW

    It’s Fake Or Real?

    Please Check It This!

  63. mitch
    January 25th, 2008 | 02:11

    when will the dvdSCR of cloverfield be out anyone know?

  64. janke
    January 25th, 2008 | 02:34

    FreeKer

    where are u gettting that from??

  65. nasferatu
    January 25th, 2008 | 02:54

    your popcorn bag can be used as a barf bag….

    hahahaha… jk.

    I loved the movie..great work.

    Perhaps my perspective was a bit off, but if the monster that killed hud was the same one that was walking around the city, shouldn’t he/she been bigger?

  66. QUALITY SUCKS
    January 25th, 2008 | 03:52

    DON’T BOTHER…it’s not “watchable” because it’s told from the perspective of an actor’s video camera and because it’s at night (therefore dark) with a dark video cam taping the movie.

    It IS a great movie, but don’t ruin it for yourself/yourselves by downloading this POS.

  67. melo
    January 25th, 2008 | 07:05

    Here’s another link:

    (double rar)

    http://rapidshare.com/files/86420754/clvrfld.part.01.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86420772/clvrfld.part.02.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86420764/clvrfld.part.03.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86420853/clvrfld.part.04.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86420828/clvrfld.part.05.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86421147/clvrfld.part.06.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86421452/clvrfld.part.07.rar

    enjoy

  68. Leechy-Kun
    January 25th, 2008 | 07:28

    Not a bad movie minus the fact it was all recorded on camera. Would’ve been better if they did a variation of cam record and real filming. I do give it a plus on realism in terms of sfx, and fear :)

    Much better than Blair Witch for sure. Atleast this movie didn’t make me wanna puke.

  69. cleanshaven
    January 25th, 2008 | 08:29

    ill download this and check it out u.k release is next friday when will there be a r5 version or dvdscreener ???

  70. Harper:ToV
    January 25th, 2008 | 09:22

    Over all, this a good movie, but if you suffer from motion sickness, then you would be best to stay away from watching it on the big screen.

  71. BiG-A
    January 25th, 2008 | 12:53

    Try this link

    http://rapidshare.com/files/86418953/clvrfld.part.01.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86420505/clvrfld.part.02.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86420516/clvrfld.part.03.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86420512/clvrfld.part.04.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86420824/clvrfld.part.05.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86421129/clvrfld.part.06.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/86421361/clvrfld.part.07.rar

    enjoy!!

  72. DaSNAKE
    January 25th, 2008 | 17:21

    It would have been a better movie if the monster had more than a cameo. I wouldn’t recommend this flick to anyone!

  73. Lasher
    January 25th, 2008 | 17:49

    one of the best films i’ve ever seen, and definitely better then the “family cheese” monster movies the yanks bring out normally. like godzilla

    every giant monster movie has made me feel embarassed to watch it, either cheesie one liners, cliches, stupid characters, or worse acting…

    this film was pro, before i’d watched this my favourite had to have been the asian one, with that thing that lives in the river, but it was a cheeseball comedy aswel as a monster movie, so it got let down big time…

    chances are if you didn’t like this film, you prolly liked alot of boring films, like atonement or american gangster.

  74. ITRUK
    January 25th, 2008 | 18:54

    Whats the address of that russian site which has the R5 release dates?

  75. II Thousand 3WRX
    January 26th, 2008 | 00:07

    Cloverfield: King Kong Meets Blair Witch Project.

  76. CoolBlade
    January 26th, 2008 | 00:27

    Telesync is not a handheld camera. Your misinformed! Telesync is when special equipment is conected to the audio and projector and produce a somewhat ok quality. If you have HD equipment you can have really good quality such as “Passion of Christ TS” Amazing quality. Please do your homework.

    Real Telesyncs are hard to make with more policing of theaters and lawas governing them. also Each reel has a special code that appears at a special time. To elimnate that code is very difficult with a direct input record. but with a cam (Cell phone cam or video camera) The quality is pretty bad and who are they going to go after? some day they will sell tickets and seat locations. you must sit at the seat or you can be wrongly accused of taping a movie. lol

  77. CoolBlade
    January 26th, 2008 | 00:32

    oops I just read something and I mispeled the proper form of recoding. my apologies it is TC not TS that I was refering too. and yes they are hard to come by without the right equipment. But they can still trace you with their watermarks.

  78. Rap
    January 26th, 2008 | 05:08

    Went to the theater to watch it but I truly want 50% of my money back…Hand Held Camera suckssssssssssssssssssssss…I hope the DVD scene comes out asap..This movie was really hard to see in the big screen…How long do we have to wait for PART 2?

  79. nick
    January 27th, 2008 | 23:26

    HOW BOUT A BETTER SCENE RELEASE!?

  80. kirk
    January 29th, 2008 | 06:00

    Definantely worth going to see in the theater, you have to ahve an attention span, its all told from a first person perspective and it is really a great movie

  81. CajuCLC
    January 29th, 2008 | 17:52

    English subtitle?

  82. captainkremmen
    January 29th, 2008 | 22:34

    What idiot said it is safer to download via Rapidshare than torrent sites?. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact it’s probably easier to hide yourself from the authorities with torrents than rapidshare. Use extra programs such as privoxy and peerguardian, and keep them updated. Use torrent sites that do not store IP addresses of those searching (such as newtorrents, piratebay etc. these sites lose IP address information when the servers are shut down). If you’re especially paranoid use proxy servers for searching the torrent sites, or use TOR Proxy to route via the TOR network without having to install a TOR client.

    With Rapidshare, you hand over your credit card information for an account, which leads to your name and address being on their files, information on your downloads are on their servers too. Not exactly difficult for the authorities to trace you is it?. They don’t even need to trace your IP address if they have access to your credit card details and what you have downloaded.

    Both ways of downloading have their good points, rapidshare is fast for those with paid accounts, full HTTP speed. It is much easier to find what you want on Torrent sites than to search Rapidshare, and of course, there is far more content on torrent sites too but unless you are downloading something with hundreds of seeders the speeds will likely be much slower than Rapidshare expecially from public trackers.

  83. captainkremmen
    January 29th, 2008 | 22:36

    and remember, if they really want to catch you, they probably will in the end.

    :-)

  84. Ivette
    January 31st, 2008 | 19:27

    omgawd… that quality is so bad… soo bad, dont download it seriously, it’d be a waste of time. I know it’s a cam and im not supposed to ask for much, but it seriously not worth it

  85. FreshNClean
    February 17th, 2008 | 04:08

    What and where do you get the free program “RapGet”?

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All

Leave a reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Hot info about new scene releases!