Releaselog

Cloverfield PROPER TS XViD-iLG

Posted on 02.02.2008 at 03:18 in Movies, Telesync by Christian

Another TS, but this time of “Cloverfield”, by some critics one of the best movies this year. Well i have to check that, since i didn’t watched it yet. Previous TS release by OBSESSiON was nuked for No IVTC so that’s why a proper. Also this one have a completely different source than previos OBSESSiON’s one, so you can expect a lil’ bit more of quality. ;-)

Cloverfield.PROPER.TS.XViD-iLG

1CD, 697.24 MB , i-clovpro
XviD, 592 x 304, 808kbps, 23.976fps, MPEG-1 Layer 3, 48000Hz 120 kb/s
Samples: #1, #2, #3, #4, Video Sample
IMDb 7.9/10, Homepage, NFO, Torrent

* Comments(200)

Comments (200)

Feel free to post your Cloverfield PROPER TS XViD-iLG torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: [1] 2 » Show All
  1. Links
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:18

    Sample
    i-clovpro.sample.avi
    http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=6de85bc

    Download
    i-clovpro.avi
    http://d01.megashares.com/?d01=6979630

    or

    http://rapidshare.com/files/88473656/clove.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88473606/clove.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88473610/clove.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88473627/clove.part4.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88473605/clove.part5.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88473602/clove.part6.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88473582/clove.part7.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88473377/clove.part8.rar
    or
    http://netload.in/dateidb6248d35a0f6bba82e8eadfc3c134a2/clove.part1.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei74915e996e7a8eee05e28eede6a3e604/clove.part2.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/dateif3484ada8ff1e1652fcfc3e268b95d9e/clove.part3.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/dateida477f8604cb37c00571f47909e48e60/clove.part4.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/dateid68e768ceadff8cf4456fdbc48ba5bf3/clove.part5.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei5ec910d060a5ebf0a9ea951ef03e9b83/clove.part6.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei275f511a83a51793d3912b3b45513b64/clove.part7.rar.htm
    http://netload.in/datei153b68b88309bcd6420d10ce77954e93/clove.part8.rar.htm

  2. Mr Right
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:19

    Shaky camera stuff like Blair Witch. No thanks.

  3. Sam
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:21

    To be able to fully enjoy a movie like this you need to watch it in theaters or watch it on DVD quality.

  4. jordansky
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:23

    @3 I agree, don’t waste your time on this, wait for a screener or r5. You will hate it in anything less than DVD quality.

  5. loyalty
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:23

    Please please please put up a MegaUpload link. :)

  6. grainofsand
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:23

    i’ve passed on the other but i think this one will do.

  7. Alex
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:25

    @ me too

    an sombody cant tell me what is this movie about

  8. Alex
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:25

    @6

  9. name.
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:26

    “..one of the best movies this year..” – ummmmm it’s 2nd February

  10. DREW0020
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:26

    NOT BAD

  11. hey
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:27

    Maybe its better than AVP2..

  12. Stunzeed
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:27

    Any idea on a screener or R5 release date. Dan in real life was supposed to be out R5 2 days ago. Does this copy mean Cloverfield should be screener quality soon????

    Thanks

  13. efrwerew
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:27

    best copy yet. excellent quality TS.

  14. Stunzeed
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:27

    LOL @9

  15. Alex
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:28

    @12

    oh yeah waiting too

  16. PreDB
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:29

    The quality is probably the best for what you can achieve with a cam, unless you use the Hollywood production ones, lol – $60,000 cam, no thanks.

    If you can’t wait for an R5 or DVDSCR, this will do. It’s worth the money though, so go watch it in the cinema.

    Just avoid the “Monster” straight to dvd knock-off.

  17. Scene Is Dead
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:33

    a CAM..again
    Thanks but not thanks.

  18. DREW0020
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:36

    can someone post some links (not rapidshare) thnx

  19. loyalty
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:41

    Please post a megaUpload link…Pretty please!!

  20. squee666
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:41

    yeh i would kill for Megaupload links

  21. The Original Geek
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:43

    “Just avoid the “Monster” straight to dvd knock-off.”

    Lol! Too late. Got to love/hate the ripoffs from the Asylum.

  22. ke
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:44

    @9 Hahhahah so true!

  23. leviathon
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:45

    nzb for this is in guest section at http://www.homerzmoviez.net

  24. PreDB
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:45

    @21, lol!

    I usually watch the knockoffs afterwards. :p

  25. james
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:45

    Although its made by JJ Abrams of Lost fame the movie sounds pretty boring.

  26. thenyproject
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:47

    Hella people want to see this, when it pre’d it had TONS of hits on IRC

  27. feetix
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:50

    haha seeing the dunkin donut sign on the image in the post. I find it kind of funny good product placement

  28. dr falken
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:56

    k, the picture aint too bad, but the almost constant prrrrrttttttttttt noise in the background will get annoying very very quickly.

  29. THE_GUY
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:57

    @27, rlslog has a deal with dunkin donuts

  30. melvin
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:57

    HAHA!!!! @27. I was thinking the EXACT same thing!!

  31. Neesh
    February 2nd, 2008 | 03:59

    1. Why does this site bother to post about cams and ts copies of movies?

    2. Who in their right mind bothers to download these crappy versions?

  32. THE_GUY
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:00

    @31, people who don’t want to wait

  33. Alex
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:02

    @32 exactly

    where is the R5 off DAn In Real Life

  34. 6d5g4
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:03

    @31
    Um, for people that can not wait for better quality copies…

  35. Martin
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:06

    end scene, look near the ferry, at the thing that appears from the top of the screen… Not really a spoiler, but you’ll understand a piece of conversation they have at some point in the movie :)

  36. placenta
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:06

    ‘didn’t watched it yet’….all I have to say.

    lol

  37. 6d5g4
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:08

    #36
    STFU.

  38. Yo Mama
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:09

    STFU with that crappy movie “Dan In Real Life”.

  39. animuslogic
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:09

    this is a movie you need to see as high quality. wait for a r5 or a dvdrip. Also seeing it for the first time is what made it such a hit. wait and you will be happy. the blair-witch camera style really isnt to bad as long as the quality is pro. bear with it and find a 50+ inch tv to watch this on.

  40. John
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:10

    Hey anybody know when Dan in Real Life will be released?

  41. Blake staff member
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:11

    Dan In Real Life People Shut the Fuk Up

  42. John
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:12

    @41, if you werent staff I would tell u what u can do.

  43. 6d5g4
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:16

    John, be patient.

  44. Blake staff member
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:16

    @John well considering the last 4 comments from u was asking where is dan in real life i think i would be annoyed too

  45. Yo Mama
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:17

    Tell em Blake! I think that from now on RLSLOG shouldn’t post the expected release date for movies since these n00bs get all excited and annoying. Just because its on the list does not mean its gonna be release on the date next to it.

  46. zcxc
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:18

    anybody know if the meet the spartans on NW is real or not?
    no sample or nfo to be found…

  47. THE_GUY
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:18

    @45, that is true

  48. The Original Geek
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:22

    F****uck Dan In Real Life. F*****uck it in it’s collective as***s.

    The Mist R5 is what we really want.

  49. jordansky
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:24

    @42 STFU

  50. jordansky
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:26

    I agree with 48

  51. joeblow
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:27

    any critics who gave this movie rave reviews were obviously on the payroll of the company that made it because every person i know who saw it said it was horrible, and that the hand held point of view shaky camera perspective that the entire film is shot in makes you feel nauseous. in fact CNN even had a big article about people leaving the theatres in droves because the editing is so fast and the camera is constantly jerking about so much that people were getting sick, not just some, but TONS of people. that doesn’t equate to fun for me… :/

  52. Not Stupider
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:28

    I agree with that remark.
    On that note, because of certain scenes(jerky camera and wat not), I still gotta hold off til at least a screener.
    Thanx aneway RLSLOG.

  53. Brendan
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:30

    If anyone has a yastorage link for this, it would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks.

  54. PreDB
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:32

    @31 this is a site that posts “scene-releases.” You can’t compare a cam to an R5 or DVDSCR thats like comparing a bike to a Ferrari. :|

    @51, no one cares about your opinion on the movie.

  55. 6d5g4
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:35

    Blair Witch sucked… and movies with shaky hand held camera suck.
    Cloverfield sounded good but when I found out it was portrayed like Blair Witch, I knew it was not going to be.

  56. Mehrdad1
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:36

    Does anyone know if you can see the Coney Island “satellite splash” at the end? That would be the only reason that I would download this. Reply back if you know. Thanks!

  57. Matt
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:37

    Best first person film of the year :P

    This movie is not at all like blair witch, because it doesn’t suck.

    Don’t see why people are posting they will not download it, how dumb is that?

    I saw this in theaters and it is probably my favourite movie of the year (so far).

  58. goatman
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:40

    well i was epileptic back in the day and saw this in the cinema (this movie seemed worth it) and had no problems but being at the back helped. but yeah dont bother with a cam or ts most of this movie was shot during the night so the quality will suck wait till a r5 or dvd rip and watch it in 5.1 sound too :D

  59. Brendan
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:41

    We all have our opinions of the movie.
    Some hated it, some loved it.
    I’d like to hear opinions about the quality of this release.
    So, for thse who have already downloaded it…
    As a TS, how is the quality? Pic? Sound?

  60. suicidesaints
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:41

    What a crappy day — only two movies released and both are TS

    @53 — you really think dan in real life is like the real world? — besides people want to see that movie mainly for steve carrell who is a very funny actor

  61. 6d5g4
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:42

    @58
    I’m going to watch it, hoping it does not annoy as did Blair Witch did.
    Thanks for comment, I will watch it with a more open mind.

  62. FreeKeR
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:44

    Hmm..

    cloverfield dvdscr coming soon..

    but, scene pix very sux!

  63. kv0703x5
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:46

    yea, ok, this one has way better video, but the audio sucks >.<

  64. JDizzle
    February 2nd, 2008 | 04:48

    wants lars and the real girl over dan in fake life

  65. jam
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:07

    THIS movie is OUT of SYNC @ 0:24:01

  66. bobajob
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:13

    @53 yeah but why does it have to be asked (well some seem to demand)4 in all comments multipul times. so to all asking please stop im sick of seeing it. when it comes u,ll know

  67. jam
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:14

    oh well the audio sync doesn’t really matter since HUD is behind the camera and people are talking away fro the camera any way LOL..

    i’d give this copy a 7/10 vid quality, very watchable

  68. bobajob
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:14

    sorry should have been @61

  69. FLFod
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:17

    @66 is the out of sync from 27 minutes onward to the rest of the movie, or does it sort itself out eventually?

  70. Eric
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:19

    I can tell you Dan in Real Life weirdos dont know quality entertainment…It sucked real life balls….Id rather watch a shiesty cam version of Cloverfield

  71. Britnasty
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:22

    Does the sync fix itself or not :(

  72. Eric
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:24

    and for those who think steve carrell is funny….I laugh. He’s a one joke guy, just like will ferrell…All he ever plays is the awkward bussinessman/boyfriend/virgin, unfunny man

  73. animuslogic
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:28

    its nothing like the blair witch. just wait for a good copy and make a decision after you ve been through the hectic journey known as cloverfield. its a hate love thing.

  74. jam
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:32

    @70, @72 no it doesnt fix it self… its ok.. cause you don’t really see them when they talk.. im still watching it.. 20 more min until ending

  75. jam
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:33

    …

    This movie is Watchable.. you dont need DVD-Quality to see this film.. it’s only 1 hour and 13 min. you’ll live.

  76. J
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:40

    MegaUpload link PLZ.

  77. Timmy Twotoe
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:45

    megaupload and rapidshare are for f4ggot n00bs.

  78. Akif Bayram
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:49

    I compared this version of Cloverfield to the other first one that was on RLSLOG, and I noticed that they are the same thing. The only difference is that background noises were removed, somehow.

  79. Mixtrixx
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:50

    LOL So many people moaning about this release without actually viewing the sample!!! Shame on you, but I’d say it’s more then acceptable quality for a TS release. All those moaners still have Terrible Visions of Past Releases Stuck in their heads.

  80. jam
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:50

    this movie is ALL HYPE… the actual story is pretty dull. This is what the start of 2008 has been about. Brand advertising.. pay attention to the movie and count how many brands JJ Abhrams includes in the film. And all those advertisers are pretty happy I bet.

  81. Mixtrixx
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:52

    @80 LOL You give me software that improves the audio and video quality that much then I’ll start converting the old SMR 2×200+ MB Cam movies for ya :D

  82. jam
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:54

    @83 oh SMR.. how i miss you , Kazaa days

  83. Tom
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:56

    @79

    So what do you use ? ar least RS i way better and faster than torrent.

  84. Joey
    February 2nd, 2008 | 05:59

    Usenet Newsgroups are the way to go…

    Easy.

  85. leviathon
    February 2nd, 2008 | 06:00

    regarding my post @23 in future any links i have i shall just say the link for this is in the guest section ok sorry for linking incorrectly

  86. Afaz
    February 2nd, 2008 | 06:10

    Was this movie really any good, I heard they dont even show the monster…?

  87. nWo
    February 2nd, 2008 | 06:43

    I saw it twice in cinema

    Best movie in a long time

  88. Triangle25
    February 2nd, 2008 | 06:44

    @Mehrdad1

    Yes, you can.

  89. Arnold
    February 2nd, 2008 | 06:54

    @Afaz

    You have been misinformed…Would you mind telling me where you heard that?

  90. gord
    February 2nd, 2008 | 07:04

    I just finished watching this, and the audio is not out of sync. I watched it on Windows media player.
    Not bad quality, little dark in places, hard to make out some stuff, but audio is good.
    I liked this movie, I think I will go to the theater and see this, good movie.
    The shaky camera thing is not as annoying as in the Bourne movies, this is from the point of view from someone this is happening to so if you think of someone holding a video camera the whole time, it is really quite good. In my opinion only. Other people hate this, and others like it, that is why it is an opinion and not a matter of fact. I liked it.

  91. Saime
    February 2nd, 2008 | 07:07

    http://rapidshare.com/files/88493153/clove.part1.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88492997/clove.part2.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88492986/clove.part3.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88493002/clove.part4.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88492983/clove.part5.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88498801/clove.part6.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88493136/clove.part7.rar
    http://rapidshare.com/files/88492964/clove.part8.rar

    http://black-bb.net

  92. tessk
    February 2nd, 2008 | 07:11

    What is this movie about? Is it better then Halo 3?

  93. Mr. X staff member
    February 2nd, 2008 | 07:20

    I seem to think of Dunkin Donuts everytime I hear the movie title Cloverfield.

  94. jam
    February 2nd, 2008 | 07:33

    @Mr X. i think of Sephora everytime I hear the movie Cloverfield

  95. 911InsideJob
    February 2nd, 2008 | 07:41

    i just watched this, i give it a 10, there was not 1 second that i was bored, very good movie.

  96. Triangle25
    February 2nd, 2008 | 07:44

    @tessk

    the movie is about a remote controlled monster that muslim radicals send into NY City to kill americans. they also blow up the brooklyn bridge and the statue of liberty. the muslim radicals are taught a lesson in the end.

  97. james
    February 2nd, 2008 | 07:52

    RLSLOG should bother posting cams but should post ts as they are of watchable quality, this ts looks pretty good.

  98. leftfield
    February 2nd, 2008 | 07:53

    excuse me, but can anyone explain what are nzb files and how they work?
    also, is there a way of getting around the waiting time for rapidshare files without a premium membership?

  99. Fungible
    February 2nd, 2008 | 08:01

    @leftfield

    how are you able to use rapidshare without a premium account? i have always had one, but i didnt know you could use rapidshare for free. is it worth it?

  100. AssChief
    February 2nd, 2008 | 08:21

    @101

    You can use it for free but have to wait like an hour between files. And theres like a 100mb cap or something.

    @leftfield

    Yep, there are ways. Proxies are your friend. Theres alot of garbage sites that don’t work, but theres quite a few that do. Paying for RS premium=nub. But paying a membership to steal movies is the cool thing these days. So keep on payin!

    And in other news-Richard Branson of Virgin Records will make commercial space flight a reality in 2009 for all you space cadets.

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a reply