Releaselog

Casino Royale UPDATE

There’s a decent TS available from PUKKA and the OST is out as well so check them out. The TS has quite good audio. The video is, as usual, dark and a bit grainy but nothing too annoying. After watching the sample I think that this is the best release so far and I think it’s watchable. So check it out!

Casino.Royale.TELESYNC.XViD-PUKKAtorrent, samples #1, #2, #3

David_Arnold-Casino_Royale_OST-2006-XXLtorrent

Comments (18)

Feel free to post your Casino Royale UPDATE torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. Dylan Avery
    November 18th, 2006 | 11:37

    The score is brilliant, “African Rundown” ftw!

  2. HBx2000
    November 18th, 2006 | 12:11
  3. Hbkwarez
    November 18th, 2006 | 13:18

    can you post the screenshots for this movie. I am a fan of bond’s movie….Hoping for screens caps soon …

  4. Spartacus
    November 18th, 2006 | 13:35
  5. Hbkwarez
    November 18th, 2006 | 15:46

    Thanks Buddy…

  6. masuo
    November 18th, 2006 | 16:14

    wow this is realy great Q !

    thx dude

  7. Hbkwarez
    November 18th, 2006 | 16:54

    just checked the audio from recode..sample “It was crappy cam audio”Who cares it’s Free.

  8. crimson
    November 18th, 2006 | 19:46

    watchable

  9. November 18th, 2006 | 20:50

    why do the always take screenies of scenes where there is no action? wouldn’t an action scene give you a better idea how it will actually look? (or how badly for that matter)

  10. November 19th, 2006 | 00:58

    This movie stinks. I saw it last night. Me and the wife paid $16 total to get in, not to count drinks and popcorn. (I snuck in my own Jr. Mints). The new Bond guy is cool. But this isn’t a Bond movie. He’s not sauve. He doesn’t have any cool gadgets. He shoots people indiscriminately. He falls in love with a girl after knowing her for a couple of days. Very disappointing.

  11. November 19th, 2006 | 07:11

    bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad bad adn bad

  12. jiminy cricket
    November 19th, 2006 | 09:49

    you fuckin retards, read a book, this may be the most faithful bond film since the connery days, what kind of goober says not enough gadgets, go see spy kids doofus

  13. cinaj
    November 24th, 2006 | 17:08

    greatest bond since decades! watch it!

  14. Stinkfist1972
    November 26th, 2006 | 05:51

    how do you get this thing to run? do I need a special player?

  15. curious
    November 26th, 2006 | 14:27

    do english subs come with this rls?

  16. ENZ
    December 3rd, 2006 | 16:07

    mrsharkattack:

    THIS movie is actually “old”, the first bond film ever. And the reason why they chose a new Bond, was because they wanted to try something new, with almost no gadgets etc. And why he shoots everybody and falls in love at once is because he has just become a 00′. Imo this bond film is one of the best; this has a new era, completely different from the other bond-movies, and Daniel Craig did a fabolous job as James Bond. Oh and btw, I’m an Bond fan and I can definately see that you aren’t =)

    -Thank You

  17. Brazman
    December 8th, 2006 | 13:31

    saw the movie today…I HATED IT, your right, this IS NOT A BOND MOVIE. I think they would have been better cutting out the “Bond” bits and marketing it as somthing else, but to do THIS to a bond movie is criminal! I say bring back Pierce! He’s no roger moore, but he has got to be better then this guy…for god sake! My favourites are…I love all the Bond movies but I have to say this one stinks big time…it doesn’t even fit into the “Timeline”! Judi Dench is “M”!?! if this is meant to start the Bond films off..isn’t “M” supposed to be a guy!? or did she get some time machine and magically go to the future…well done…

  18. Shark
    January 3rd, 2007 | 11:52

    This is a remake of the first movie about James Bond I think. Its ok it is more real but it would be better if Goran Višnjić had act instead of Craig. And the best Bond off all time is Sean Connery no doubt.

Leave a reply