Releaselog

British police allowed to hack into private PCs

The power of anti piracy organizations is constantly growing and latest news from Great Britain sounds somehow scary: The Home Office has quietly adopted a new plan to allow police across Britain routinely to hack into people’s personal computers without a warrant. The move, which follows a decision by the European Union’s council of ministers in Brussels, has angered civil liberties groups and opposition MPs. They described it as a sinister extension of the surveillance state which drives “a coach and horses” through privacy laws. The hacking is known as “remote searching”. It allows police or MI5 officers who may be hundreds of miles away to examine covertly the hard drive of someone’s PC at his home, office or hotel room. Material gathered in this way includes the content of all e-mails, web-browsing habits and instant messaging.


Under the Brussels edict, police across the EU have been given the green light to expand the implementation of a rarely used power involving warrantless intrusive surveillance of private property. The strategy will allow French, German and other EU forces to ask British officers to hack into someone’s UK computer and pass over any material gleaned. A remote search can be granted if a senior officer says he “believes” that it is “proportionate” and necessary to prevent or detect serious crime — defined as any offence attracting a jail sentence of more than three years. The authorities could break into a suspect’s home or office and insert a “key-logging” device into an individual’s computer. This would collect and, if necessary, transmit details of all the suspect’s keystrokes. The Home Office said it was working with other EU states to develop details of the proposals.

Source: The Times

Comments (145)

Feel free to post your British police allowed to hack into private PCs torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: [1] 2 »
  1. dex
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:43

    they should die of cancer

  2. Chad
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:43

    lol i love america

  3. Chael
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:44

    Is this possible even if you had a custom firewall and block foreign ip addresses?

  4. Josh
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:44

    This is really true? :o

  5. hitman
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:46

    Personal PC ??? WOW thats freaking crazy. i mean what if there was dirty cop huh and he hacked someones pc and that guy was on a banking site yea so.. i mean he can get the everything he wants :(

  6. stuntdoogie
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:46

    hey chad dont get to happy. america and britain are blood brothers. and soon enough we here in america will get the same treatment. both countries along with others will become police states.

  7. Hobnob
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:47

    Wow, I never thought my government would BE THIS GREAT, imagine that they could spy on or even edit your personal information and stuff you post on the internet this is a step IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.

  8. Matt
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:47

    Americans don't need permission to do this is all, they can already do it to anything else :/

  9. Respect-My-Authority
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:48

    I have to agree, do they honestly have a hack that can bypass multiple firewall's that block foreign IP's? I mean, as long as you've got one of the better anti-virus programs with a good firewall I don't see how they could hack in. At least, not without an exploit, but it would seem the exploit would be fixed asap.

  10. YaRi
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:49

    If you read it closely, it actually says that they mainly monitor the outgoing data; email, web browsing, IM. The actual hard drive access is not mentioned in the text at all.
    Anyway, the three year jail sentence is the minimum requirement for these extreme measures. If you are worried about this may happen to you, you may very well deserve it anyway.

  11. OGKush
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:50

    @9 PATRIOT ACT. :( EFF YOU BUSH, EFF YOU RIGHT IN YOUR A$$.

  12. Matt
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:51

    This somewhat reminds me of this now :

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d82Lq2rVB_4

  13. 8-BYTE
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:51

    IT IS POSSILBLE TO BE UNSEEN TO THEM..??

  14. lol
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:51

    ^what if those cops or the government ordered the firewall software companies to offer them a "free pass" that grants them to access certain computers?

  15. abc
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:52

    so if i look porn they will also look porn lol :p

  16. aolsucks
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:52

    @8

    lol have you lost your mind?
    this isnt that good, infact bad
    they wont catch anyone but us downloading :P

    nah its still bad tho

  17. nick
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:53

    i would like to know how a government can be given any legitimate rights to the world's internet. The internet is good for its un-governable flow of information, to be given rights to search threw people's (not even of your own country) information is truly unmoral and in my opinion could be worse then what the US did with phone taps.

  18. fat_fighter
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:53

    Invasion of privacy , now is time for every1 to get PeerGuardian 2 , get a warezed version of a firewall.

  19. baddab
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:56

    "Anyway, the three year jail sentence is the minimum requirement for these extreme measures. If you are worried about this may happen to you, you may very well deserve it anyway."

    perhaps for now, and besides that, google a little and you will see that britain is one of the worst countries in terms of government data protection. its like someone of the government loses at least one USB stick or notebook with thousands if not millions of personal or secret data each week.

  20. ScHAmPi
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:56

    "^what if those cops or the government ordered the firewall software companies to offer them a "free pass" that grants them to access certain computers?"

    Good point… but if such a system would be inserted it would get lots of complaints. It would only be a matter of days or weeks before not-so-nice hackers learn how to use it for their own less innocent business. So there's no way they would do this.

  21. Santa
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:56

    F@CK the EU and the US they are turning europe into a policestate.

  22. Dan123
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:57

    This is an absolute joke what rights do the flammin pigs have hacking my pc if they want to check it they should come knock the door and pick the thing up cheeky barstewards as for this goverment there all toffey nose twits anyway there must be some law against this human rights and all that

    If i cant hack someone what right do pigs have hacking me

  23. Me
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:57

    I just wonder why don't they look for drug and guns dealers more… Is piracy killing more teenagers nowadays than drugs/guns?

  24. sgdd
    January 5th, 2009 | 21:59

    SOOOO….

    Does this mean that I can hack in to anyones computer, if I "suspect" them of wrong doing??

    Welcome to Nazism!

  25. Stupid Question
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:01

    Stupid question maybe but how would this be possible. There are hackers out there that cannot get past internet security and stuff so how could it be done without you knowing.

  26. hikaricore
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:02

    Good luck with that.

    If they can get past my 30+ character password for ssh and vnc which are on non-standard ports while at the same time somehow getting past my hardware and software firewalls then they deserve a cookie.

  27. Dan124
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:02

    Whats next i wonder walk round with a fcukin webcam on our heads monitored 24/7 fcukin sick of uk country is a joke in a mess gordon brown is a muppet country full of illegals really what is left here for a british man ?

  28. dosguy
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:02

    @ #17:

    "i would like to know how a government can be given any legitimate rights to the world's internet."

    They don't have to "be given" anything. If they want something, including your freedom, they will take it. They are, after all, the GOVERNMENT! Witness the USA Patriot Act and you'll understand.

  29. M
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:03

    lol i love america <<

    where do you think they got the idea…. hmmm

  30. James A
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:03

    I'm taking out shares in Personal Firewall Software….

    Sunbelt, Norton, Zone Alarm, here I come…

  31. Flufsor
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:06

    Yeah, The funny thing is its only allowed that British officers to do so,
    So can't we just ban all British ip's :p
    And since when is breaking(firewall) and entering (pc) allowed, i always taught that getting evidence on a illegal way broke the power of the evidence.
    But anyway piracy is much more targeted then lets say murder,rape,…
    Its a wierd world :(

  32. F8L23
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:07

    so as long as u got pg2 and a firewall like AVG's we "should" be ok? or not cuz i would be boned if they looked at web browsing habits or HDD.

  33. huiii
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:08

    @ 24

    Only if you work for the police.

    If not, you could still blackmail someone by uploading lotz'n lotz of child porn/bomb building manuals on someones computer..

  34. vvv
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:08

    dont confuse britain with the EU - cus its not!

  35. Mark
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:09

    They already have this power, not such a big deal really. If they wanted to arrest you, they would, i mean its not exactally difficult to hack into someones machine and they have some of the smartest ppl in the world working for them.

    However i agree i can't see a way of bypassing peoples firewalls etc. Unless they already have a built in gap in the firewell we don't know about…. oooo makes u think ;)

  36. Bigxyz
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:10

    Three things 1@#10: YaRi

    Yes, the article DOES specifically state hard drive access:

    "It allows police or MI5 officers who may be hundreds of miles away to examine covertly the hard drive of someone’s PC at his home, office or hotel room."

    2@everyone asking about firewalls ability to protect personal data

    The article says that firewalls don't matter because:

    "The authorities could break into a suspect’s home or office and insert a “key-logging” device into an individual’s computer."

    3@#17: nick

    This isn't giving the government any more or less rights to the world's internet then it already had previously, however, these laws WILL be giving the government something it didn't have previously: The ability to use the information gained to prosecute people, legally. They already have the ability to do these things, what they needed, and got apparently, was the ability to use information acquired illegally and in violation of peoples rights to privacy, to put them in jail. This wouldn't normally be that much of a problem, and truely isn't to most pirates, since piracy in most civilized countries is usually a civil matter, unless the pirates are making lots of money or distributing crazy amounts of material. The problem, of course, comes when law enforcement officials use this power to plant evidence or use their "legal" ability to take advantage of people and the justice system, which SOMEONE will undoubtedly do, because someone always does. And because of these laws, they will probably get away with it.

  37. Serge
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:10

    Linux

  38. iddoom3
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:10

    Wow, this is absolutely crazy. I can't believe any government of any country would want to give anyone the authority to do something like this. Instead of policing the streets and keeping society safe from bad people, now they are gonna have the right to hack into peoples personal computers? Why not issue them keys to your front door as well. This is not right.

    Bad cop, no donut.

  39. FT
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:11

    Home Office denies remote snooping plan

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/05/police_remote_snoop/

  40. SmokingMan
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:14

    This kind of thing has been going on for a long while in both the UK and in the US and only now is it being mentioned as if it's a new thing. It's all being done for our own good…at least that's what the controllers would have you believe. All of these "special measures" are not to catch any criminals but are there to control us and keep us constantly monitored like the "useless eaters" they think we are.
    Welcome to the New World Order…

  41. AF
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:15

    "Anyway, the three year jail sentence is the minimum requirement for these extreme measures. If you are worried about this may happen to you, you may very well deserve it anyway."

    Copyright theft carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in the UK.

  42. Skullptura
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:21

    good news…

  43. no
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:26

    aye were nothing but cattle in there eyes, just imagine what its gonna be like in another 10 years

  44. stuntdoogie
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:26

    @40
    Finally someone who is awake and open minded.

  45. douche
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:35

    ITS NOT FOR PEOPLE WHO DOWNLOAD, YOU THINK THEY WOULD GIVE U A 3 YEAR SENTENCE FOR DOWNLOADING, ITS TO LOOK UP ON REAL CRIMINALS.
    LOOK
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7812353.stm

  46. BlueJay
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:36

    What is happening to my country??? I've got to get out of here.

    Looks like I'll be using SSL and encryption a lot more when possible.

  47. hotdigitydog
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:37

    They could easily implement government agency rules for firewall software to allow for a government override. They have already done this with software like file shredders. For example, tuneup utilities 2009's file shredder will only shred files in accordance with department of defense standards. Even though they list other methods within the utility, all options will be retrievable by government agencies.
    This is already happening in the U.S. anyway. A friend in San Diego had his net routed to a page with instructions to remove specific files that he had downloaded. Once those files were removed then he had to click a link and allow for an activeX module to be loaded into his system which then confirmed the deletion of those files. He was then warned not to do it again or face blacklisting. For those interested, the isp was COX cable.
    He was using pg2, norton 360 (sux), and multiple blocklists from iblocklist.org were loaded into pg2. In addition he had encryption forced on utorrent and was downloading from a reliable source (gizmolio off mininova).
    dht, peer exchange, and upnp (for firewall) were all disabled within utorrent.

  48. dude12
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:37

    lol at 2. Chad.

    In America these things happen all the time but the government doesn't inform you about it ;)

    lol

  49. me
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:41

    "Anyway, the three year jail sentence is the minimum requirement for these extreme measures. If you are worried about this may happen to you, you may very well deserve it anyway."

    you should take a glance at some criminal laws over the world … in my country for example you can get up to 3 years of prison for sharing copyright stuff in total value of about 4k € (cumulative) - so to put it plainly: if you download via torrent let's say adobe ultimate cs4 or whatever the whole collection is called and maybe some new office, windows and maya, you already have enough to be put away for 3 years …

  50. keyboard kowboy
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:41

    Shows you how F***ed up gordon brownpants really is !!!!

    We have this for snooping on UK citizens at the same time he is allowing 60 or so terrorists to come live in this country because bush\obama want to close their nice holiday resort in cuba.

    Personally the way this country is going i wouldnt mind taking the beachfront property in cuba off bush's hands lol

  51. AJ
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:42

    @all look up infowars for more insight into the new world order,

  52. baddab
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:43

    "ITS NOT FOR PEOPLE WHO DOWNLOAD, YOU THINK THEY WOULD GIVE U A 3 YEAR SENTENCE FOR DOWNLOADING, ITS TO LOOK UP ON REAL CRIMINALS.
    LOOK"
    wanna see how you can twist that?
    if you dont buy stuff, but download it, you hurt the economy, the state loses money and jobs, you get social unrest that threatens social peace, also money will be missing for investment into anti terrorist measures and the military, so, you are basically supporting terrorists. they define "real criminals" not you.

    your browsing habit, emails and everything else, that you dont encrypt strong and securely is being saved and monitored already, by everyone (what do you think google does with its information? you dont know? thats the problem, nobody knows).

    and you can throw your personal firewall away, who knows how many backdoors there are, and how many exploits that you dont know about… even hardware routers are vulnerable (see cisco).

    only way to keep your personal stuff for yourself, one machine for internet, one machine offline.

  53. Cpt. Obvious
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:43

    Well… there goes my plan to move to the UK.

    Seriously, your justice system over there is really borked.

  54. Jason
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:44

    But can they play Crisis with you? lol =P

  55. greyhound
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:50

    this is beyond sick, just when I thought there was nothing more my government could do to shock me further!

    @50 - Guantanamo sure sounds like a better option from now on eh?!
    Screw Brown & this sodding country, this is the last straw

  56. Dan123
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:54

    @ 53 You would be crazy to move here seriously the country is in a right mess i wouldnt give it a second thought if i was you

    It would be the biggest mistake of your life

  57. BlueJay
    January 5th, 2009 | 22:57

    @53 I have to agree with 53. Not only is the country already a sardine can (ie. there is no room to breath) the police will all be looking at those naked pictures of you wife that you have on your PC.

  58. The truth
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:06

    1984 is here.

  59. Zack
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:07

    Not even personal e-mails etc are to be spared.. bunch of pencil-pushers.

    Next they'll be observing married couples when they have sex!

  60. Ed
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:08
  61. ttrtd
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:21

    1 england is biggest Nazism! country in the world. they pretend and act like they are so nice and good to the world but they are not. this country has the most racism in the world. there kids kill innocent black kids all the time. the government covers it up.

  62. Peter
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:23

    V for Vendetta anyone :)??
    "any offence attracting a jail sentence of more than three years", in couple of years they'll change it to less and less. I tell You what Nazi germany could not achieve with force the EU will accomplish it in times of peace with us agreeing with this!!

  63. BlueJay
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:23

    @61 You say kids kill innocent black kids all the time… which is true. However, statically speaking most of the time it is other black kids killing the black kids… so where does the racism come into it?

  64. rje
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:24
  65. nha
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:26

    It's time for all those clever hackers out there to really pull together and keep the internet free/privacy-safe and the best way to freely spread information.. come on hackers get to it and make a tool that locks these guys out full stop - I can't believe it can't be done!

  66. Nathan
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:26

    This is madness. Even if it is not tracking us 'downloaders' or Pirates (I prefer that name =D) it is still unfair. The name Personal Computer does not even exist now. Keyword PERSONAL. I wouldn't mind if it was called a 'Everyone Can See What Your Doing… Computer or ECSWYDP. I do hate England sometimes… I think a protest is in order… I don't know how that would work but… Yea

  67. willconmarsh
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:27

    What a "state" we are in. so much for "free speach" and liberal views. "Big Bro" is encroaching towards british society and all we can do is ????????????????

    submit??????? no!!!!!!!!

    join????????? no!!!!!!!!

    negotiate???? no!!!!!!!!

    retaliate???? no!!!!!!!!

    my opinion is to……………….

    refuse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  68. TrainSpotter
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:29

    Why don't the Brit's just have the Chinese military forward the information that they're after right to them? (China snoops everyplace, even into U.S. military systems…)
    If you think that they can't get through your little consumer operating system / firewall / antivirus - think again!

    This just shows the true power of the "intellectual property" owners; we still have to cut a check to Time-Warner when "Happy Birthday To You" gets sung in a public place, even a restaurant. Just think what they expect to be paid for a copy of "The Dark Knight" posted on the internet. I wish I got royalties or residuals for even 1% of the creative work that I've pumped out for over 40 years.

    With something like 500,000 CCTV cameras all over London, I don't think that you should be too concerned with "W" listening-in to some overseas call to Ahmed in Peshawar. (After-all, while he was doing that he pretty much left us alone.)

  69. evi1eye
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:32

    ok let just ask one question ! what software will these guys be using ?? Once we know what software is being used then we can possibly protect ourselves.. Many years ago it was found that certain particular software was used in the states! If we can find that out.. then we can do something about it (possibly)
    regards all

  70. naive american
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:33

    The thing is the US gets made a big stink out of this because everyone expects more but the same countries that decry the abuses by the US do when neccassary move quickly and quietly to skirt laws sometimes far worse then the US Govt and this isnt just what we would think of as third or second world countries but countries in the "first' world.
    Its good or a sign that the US is held to a higher standard… hopefully were not on a continuous down slide of our standards (not to be confused with our economy but they can be intertwined) and that we can restore our standing in the world in various ways.

    Were not going to win by being more efficient or even having the best military as that level of spending when done in a cold war fashion with China will only result in our downfall a few years or decades from now. We will only win by being the clear "good guy" hopefully keeping to our standards and not being purely opportunists but actually helpful good people. We'll see i guess.

  71. ( oO' )
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:39

    this is a very bad thing, and i can assure all of you
    goverment bodys, average joes. this 'choice' will undoubtly
    cause such a rebel that every hacker, cracker, patcher,
    and so forth will set on a vengance of destruction.

    you think we worrie about our files? our computers are
    disposable, it is your files that you should worrie about,
    it is your systems that you need to consider when you try to
    effect ours. for every door you open on our computer, your
    computer opens one for us. we shall destroy you in bid of
    freedom of speach. we controll the internet.

    your efforts are meaningless. your efforts shall fail.
    give up now for we shall provail…

  72. Pudding889
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:39

    I think the pirates wil be safe for now because in the bbc article it said plans have been suggested or something along those lines and who knows it will take for he law to actually be enforced

  73. Craig
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:44

    It is a strange subject. If it can catch paedo's or terrorists etc then I don't really care but this is really open to abuse. Saying that everything we go on the internet is already monitored and has been for a while so its not really that much of a step further.

  74. e manon
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:46

    They don’t need to bypass your firewall because they are not using the Internet.
    Antivirus suites won’t protect your PC.
    Passwords for security are a joke so don’t think that a 30 character password will save you.
    Banning British IPs won’t help at all.
    It won’t affect anyone outside of the UK.
    They are using the power grid in a unique way to decode pulse modulation generated by your PC, effectively taking snapshots of hard drives. It won’t matter if you use Linux instead of Windows and it won’t matter if you don’t connect to the Internet at all. It is not new. Only the public disclosure is. They are not after downloaders or peer to peer file sharers. Rather more serious groups.
    Relax they have been doing it for a while now. There’s nothing you can do about it.

  75. BlueJay
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:49

    @74 I hope you were wearing your tin foil hat when you typed that lol.

  76. LOL
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:56

    I say good luck to them, if they were to just monitor the visitors to here then it would be a mammoth task…

    It'll be for trying to catch terrorists etc

    Chill….

  77. Zack
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:57

    No,74 sounds like an official. But I wont deny that everything he said makes super-sense.

  78. yeahright
    January 5th, 2009 | 23:58

    yeah right, I wonder how many prisons would they have to create to pack us up all there eh?

    fkin bullsithe.

    how many of people that really CAN hack they'd have to employ?

    ridiciolous.

    governments have created fake term 'war on terror' to make ppl fear of unknown even more and to create laws allowing them to infiltrate and take control over our lives.

    english's not my first language so please watch this 34min video to understand what I am trying to explain.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2461177575671329682

    "know your enemy!"

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2461177575671329682

  79. yeahright
    January 6th, 2009 | 00:04

    @75

    I LOL'd :D

    though I can relate to what @74 means :)

    "British law already allows police to remotely access computers under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, which allows surveillance to "prevent or detect serious crime". "

    from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7812353.stm

    see? 'serious crime' I highly doubt dl'ers are serious criminals. well, not from filthy economical point of view ;)

  80. Mmmmmmmm
    January 6th, 2009 | 00:08

    Don't worry about this, a friend of mine works for the police and told me they have only a hadfull of guys that will actually monitor the computers of over 60 million people that live in the UK, they do not have the time money or resources to have any real impact and they will mostly monitor the computers used by Muslims, well they do like to blow things up, so as for the rest of us its really nothing to worry about.

  81. yeahright
    January 6th, 2009 | 00:11

    that one's my last, honestly ;)

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=9nNDVjbbdMY

  82. Zen
    January 6th, 2009 | 00:32

    this isnt a "hack" atall if you read it they need physical access to your computer first

    still very emotive and ridiculously invasive

  83. blurpy
    January 6th, 2009 | 00:34

    It's never a good thing when governments or people are allowed by the law to just barge in on your computer like this. In the beginning, it might look like it won't affect you and me, but it opens up the door for other uses and other laws to come in the near future. It's all going the wrong way if you ask me.

  84. Frankie
    January 6th, 2009 | 00:44

    I bet this site is the most against this law. I wonder why? Anyway, i really wouldnt worry. I expect this is mostly to stop peadophile rings.

  85. Kevin
    January 6th, 2009 | 01:08

    Wow, two wrongs don't make a right!

  86. mrtorch
    January 6th, 2009 | 01:10

    This seems to be aimed at serious crime not p2p, here is a link to the BBC news story http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7812353.stm

  87. mary turdburger
    January 6th, 2009 | 01:12

    @84 Frankie if the police can inject malware into a persons pc then they can inject evidence and accuse anyone they want. The cameras on every street are a good idea but it's not a good idea to monitor personal computers. BUT then again how would a porn/0-day/wares/p2p/release revolution start without something like this happening.

  88. hehe
    January 6th, 2009 | 01:24

    @ 80

    you said…
    "they do not have the time money or resources to have any real impact and they will mostly monitor the computers used by Muslims, well they do like to blow things up, so as for the rest of us its really nothing to worry about."

    Silly rabbit. I think your computer should be monitored for neo-nazi material.

    Seriously, there is a way to keep anyone from snooping into your network. It is costly though.

  89. marktd
    January 6th, 2009 | 01:29

    calm down people *tut* it's just a proposal .
    they come up with crazy proposals like this every week in the UK , they always get shot down and never heard of again

  90. bisping
    January 6th, 2009 | 01:40

    Guys guys guys… you're forgetting the main point. Yes a firewall on your pc would be good but…

    What about installing a f*cking sweet house alarm and getting a couple of pitbulls "installed" in your home so they can't break in??

    LOL

  91. hikaricore
    January 6th, 2009 | 01:42

    "They are using the power grid in a unique way to decode pulse modulation generated by your PC."

    I hope that was a joke, all i can say is bullsh!t.

    As far as passwords are concerned… they are the only way anyone will ever access my system and my encrypted drives. Short of dissecting my brain none of these passwords will ever leave my body outside of a starred textbox. And hell will freeze over the day a key-logger ever makes its way onto my system.

  92. Sam
    January 6th, 2009 | 02:00

    all i need to tell you is:

    In the UK a CUSTOMS official can enter ANY premises or 'area' where THEY believe ANY act of 'Crime' is breaking the law of UK HMS customs or excise. etc,

    i am sure you understand what i am saying therefore. You could buy 100 cases of Wine from france and sell it in the UK (minus) import duty from a pub etc, the UK customs can raid that/(the sellers) premises WITHOUT A WARRANT if they so wish to…

    THESE CUSTOMS OFFICIALS ARE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE POLICE OR GOVERNMENT THEY ARE A SEPARATE COMPANY AND HAVE BEEN FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS, THESE ARE THE SAME PEOPLE THAT CHASE YOU FOR YOU TAX RETURNS, // THEREFORE HAVE THE SAME POWER.

    ANY computer that is INSIDE the UK i EXPECT it to be checked, just as most luggage bags on aeroplanes are, and Mail sent via the post office. these things happen,

    just DEAL WITH IT, and get on with your lives. TESCO buy your buying habits off you for £2.50 and sell them for over £1,000 to advertising companies….i cant see you complaining about that, just GROW UP and DEAL with it. if you cant…

    Stop BUYING anything on credit, online or face to face….

    IDIOTS

  93. Cr4sh
    January 6th, 2009 | 02:14

    if you are really worried, then just make it a habit to always leave your mouse in a specific spot on your mousepad, they'd never know to put it back exactly the same.
    if you find it moved, scan your computer.
    they'd have to allow the keylogger in your existing firewall, so either have a look at it's rules, or just install a different one.
    and Ctrl+Alt+Del will always tell you exactly what is running on your computer.

  94. WSI
    January 6th, 2009 | 02:15

    Why not take it a bit further and implant an officer in every household… but hey living under the microscope can be fun.
    I'm sick and tired of EU forcing their BS laws and regulations, if I catch any goddamn brit-twit snooping my comp there'll hell to pay!

  95. Peter
    January 6th, 2009 | 02:19

    #92, if we deal with it then all is lost. Have You read Orwell's "Year 1984" ? If not then read it and if You got something more than a peanut in Your head then you'll understand we need to oppose this peaceful fight for our minds. Have you seen "V for Vendetta" ?? This will happen, it's not just publicity movie, it's a wake up call for all of us (for those who can and think).

  96. Alexander
    January 6th, 2009 | 02:21

    Next time they propose/elect something like that, then let the civilians have full access in CIA, FBI, NORAD, etc….

  97. Peter
    January 6th, 2009 | 02:23

    #93, have You ever used Remote Desktop Connections?? They don't need to run Your mouse in order to do things in Your computer. You won't even notice until You get an official letter :)

  98. toby
    January 6th, 2009 | 02:23

    there new law to hack there peoples computer is a sham. as they know they cant hack a hackes computer.
    its more like they want to know how much money the people are spending on the side over the web. so they can impose more tax. INTERNET TAX.

  99. Peter
    January 6th, 2009 | 02:40

    In Australia, the law was amended last year. If a police officer suspected your PC had been involved in illegal activity they could confiscate it and analyse it. Illegal activity included the definition "had received spam"

    Regards

    Peter

  100. DonJuan
    January 6th, 2009 | 02:59

    RLSLOG invades my computer on a daily basis..CONGRADULATIONS, YOU HAVE BEEN SELECTED….blah blah blah

Pages: [1] 2 »

Leave a reply

Hot info about new scene releases!