Comments on: BlizzCon news: Diablo 3, Starcaft 2 trilogy

By: NukieNuggz

NukieNuggz — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:49:48 +0000

Does anyone know where you can find a rip of the DirectTV PPV coverage?

By: Nils

Nils — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:46:50 +0000

@26
When you actually get 3 full games that’s ok, if they just took one full game and split it in 3 pieces to get more money of you that just sucks and seems like a rip-off. Generally I’d pay for a good game.

By: Yotian

Yotian — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:39:29 +0000

135€ for a game (SCII trilogy) erm no thnx. ill rather DL this one XD and put my money on RA3

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:42:36 +0000

What is so bad in having 3 games of Starcraft 2 instead of just 1? At least when I finish the first I’ll be happy to have more to play. Actually, I’m salivating for the whole deal!

By: Choco

Choco — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:59:11 +0000

@ 20 (Zloduh):
It’s not fake actually. It’s a “demo” as in a straight-up “demonstration” of the gameplay. It’s a video, probably the same 19 min one that everyone has seen of the new characters and stuff. If you take the time to read the page completely, it even says “This is just a HD vid of the demo game of Diablo 3 being played.”

By: Wah

Wah — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:00:30 +0000

@13 smikis

Blizzard went on record saying that D3 is coming before SC2, ’cause there’s more guys working on it.

I’m pissed about them releasing SC2 in three packages. It’s one thing to release expansions. I’m cool with that. But to say “hey, we’re gonna release three versions of SC2… and they’re kind of expansions… but not really… because each one is basically the campaign is of that race… plus some bug fixes and balance stuff that we’re gonna do anyways… so… yeah… buy ‘em”.

As much as I want to play SC2… that right there makes me not want to support Blizzard ever again. It just doesn’t feel like it’s a time thing as much as Activision wants to make some money, so they’re forcing them to release SC2 ahead of schedule, and this is the only way they could feasibly see themselves being able to do that. I mean let’s face it. This is the company that took 10 years to do a sequel to what I would consider its most popular game.

Besides… if they need money that bad… there’s this little game called World of Warcraft… maybe you’ve heard of it? I think that has some sort of money in it.

@21 Atari

If it’s not either:

a) Each game will be ~$20
b) Each campaign will be huge

then it’s something to be unhappy about.

Anyway, I think I’m looking forward to D3 more than SC2 at this point. So I’ll get that and click click click click.

By: Hak

Hak — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:32:36 +0000

this game shouldn’t launch until everyone has a core duo and 8800gt pc….

By: RockHudson

RockHudson — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:26:00 +0000

SACRED 2 is out on release!

By: Atari

Atari — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:03:27 +0000

$150 for 3 Starcraft games? No thanks. I’ll buy one and pirate the other 2.

By: Zloduh

Zloduh — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:15:09 +0000

@7 FAKE
no demos dir at fileplanet under diablo 3 .
dont try to dl could be something nasty.

Support the game, flame blizzard >;)

By: bobbull

bobbull — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:33:50 +0000

#15 quit being cheap jerk and buy one of the
games and support the people who work hard.
diablo 3!!!!!!!!!support it.

By: Ruff McGruff

Ruff McGruff — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:59:31 +0000

i would sell my soul for a donut .. erm.. i mean starcraft

By: Redvex

Redvex — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:44:51 +0000

yay stupid move on sc2, cant believe this BS.
wont pay for that, ofc

@16: Atm it’s announced as a full price game for the 1st one and “we will see how it does” for the 2 others, prolly 1 year between each game… >.<

By: Nils

Nils — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:33:41 +0000

Hmm yeah they’ll probably have you paying full price for all of the campaigns :/

By: plop

plop — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:29:45 +0000

yeah i want farcry 2 also, and fallout 3, and x3 tC,left 4 dead, dead space …. lucky it’s all for freeeeeee…