Releaselog

Apple Mac OSX Leopard v10.5 ISO – OSX

Posted on 23.10.2007 at 19:44 in Applications by Martin

OS X Leopard

The wait has finally come to an end!

An interesting release which many people would be looking forward to. Apple OS X v.10.5 “Leopard” is leaked two days in advance before the official retail release!

I’m not sure why OS X leaks out before the launch. This is not the first time something of this sort is happening. Anyway it’s a fantastic release and I’m going to down this & dress up my MacBook Pro with the big cat, Leopard.

I’ve already posted an article on what’s new and notable in Leopard.

Been around in some Private Trackers, you got to wait for sometime for the torrent to appear in Public Trackers.

Release Name: APPLE.MAC.OSX.LEOPARD.V10.5.ISO-OSX
Size: 6.56 GB

Torrent | NFO

Apple OS X v10.5 “Leopard” | 300+ New Features | RLSLOG’s Leopard Coverage

* Comments(154)

Comments (154)

Feel free to post your Apple Mac OSX Leopard v10.5 ISO – OSX torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
Pages: [1] 2 » Show All
  1. macattack
    October 23rd, 2007 | 19:51

    been waiting a looong long time for this, lets get that torrent up!

  2. mac is overpriced junk
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:02

    someone should change the name of this site to : cork sniffing mac whores united.apple.com

  3. e-o-
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:05

    just because u cannot afford it, xD

  4. tom
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:08

    whats the deal with this and activating it etc ?

  5. Osterwelle
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:09

    Finally

    Also gonna put this on my MBP, but im gonna go with retail already ordered it and gonna get it this weekend so no need of dling such a big torrent

  6. xXx
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:10

    @ mac is overpriced junk

    I partially agree with you, Apple’s stuff is not cheap. But think of it this way…

    Mac/OS X/Apple are like hookers, they are both expensive but totally worth it!

  7. dera
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:12

    http://www.moviex.info/forums/index.php?showtopic=64060

    http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3855637/APPLE.MAC.OSX.LEOPARD.V10.5.ISO-OSX

    http://www.newtorrents.info/torrent/29576/APPLE.MAC.OSX.LEOPARD.V10.5.ISO-OSX.html

  8. ren.d
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:15

    I downloaded it yesterday, looks great.
    Had no problems thus far.

  9. fsfs3ASD
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:21

    omg just give me the wallpaper

  10. oink staff
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:24

    @2

    SO funny, when people still say Macs are overpriced. Yes, if you compare to low end Dells.

    Just compare them to the same league, like Alienware, and see who is more expensive, idiots!

  11. dudeman
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:26

    Now that macs are Intel based and all, is it possible to run this OS on a real computer (ie, a PC – a non-Macintosh)? Or does it still just run on macs?

  12. Rob
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:28

    OS X runs fine on PCs. You just need to replace the kernel and sometimes fiddle around with some kexts to make everything work. Leopard 9A559 (the last build) works fine on my $400 year-old laptop. Cheaper than a MacBook and runs better.

  13. sala81
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:29

    yep, you can run windows if you need…

  14. Ashwin staff member
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:32

    @ 10,
    7 Leopard Wallpapers

    http://hohodigidea.deviantart.com/art/7-Leopard-Wallpaper-58217330

    The Trademark Dew on Grass wallie:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dominoes/544155098/

  15. Ashwin staff member
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:33

    @13,
    It *can* run. But from what I hear, the performance might be good and there’ll tend to be some glitches. OS X is meant to run in your Apple hardware (irrespective if it’s Intel Proccy or not) only.

  16. J
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:34

    Macs ARE more expensive compared to PCs with the same specs. I personally think the Mac OS is worth paying the extra money for, but I can completely understand if someone doesn’t want to. It’s up to the individual. For instance, I’m not paying extra money for a black Macbook compared to a white one. That’s just a ripoff and is ridiculous. I’m happy with my Mac, but I can’t lie about them being more expensive than PCs. They are.

  17. whoa
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:35

    @13

    Real computer? Sorry, a Mac is every bit as real as your “real computer”. Except it can run OSX and you can’t. Buy a Mac or suck it up, you won’t run OSX normally on your computer without a bit of hacking.

  18. fsfs3ASD
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:39

    @16 thx a lot

  19. elc
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:43

    #18
    try making a dell laptop with the same specs as a macbook pro and check the price differerence.
    They’re not far from eachother in price

  20. Jobs
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:46

    Why every Mac related post turn into a flame war? I mean, yes, you all hate Macs, than I say, ppl who use Macs are don;t care. Why you have to tell everytime?

    First they ignore Macs. Then they laugh at Macs. Then they fight against Macs. Finally, Macs win!!

  21. fsfs3ASD
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:47

    Seriously I wouldnt mind buying a mac laptop, they look so sweet, even though its not windows im sure ill put it to good use.

  22. Jumbo
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:47

    RS linkz plz.

  23. dfsd
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:48

    Runing it on AMD X2 ??? Leopard_??

  24. drink or die
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:50

    a m i g a

  25. johnny77
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:51

    Can we use dual-boot with xp ?

  26. smaugthewyrm
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:51

    frequently, SPECS of two computers compared do matter, but also the quality of the parts to produce those specs must be considered.

    many companies are cutting corners in production that yield high failure rates and bizarre computer behavior.

    with computers, most of the time, the old cliche holds true…

    “You get what you pay for.”

    my macintosh has run or IS running:
    xp pro 32bit
    vista ult 64bit
    macosx
    linux (Ubuntu someday if i am motivated. LOL)

    all natively. no emulation needed anymore. true intel xeon dual core processors in the current mac pro towers.

  27. me
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:53

    lets hope PC version will be released shortly too :)

  28. BinaryBeast
    October 23rd, 2007 | 20:59

    nice rip. screw mac use PC or Linux (fedora, ubunto, sabyon).

  29. Ashwin staff member
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:00

    @ 27,
    Yeah man. Heard of Bootcamp? Also you can run Windows side by side with OS X with VM Fusionware or Parallels. You also have the option of Wine – where you can install Windows program in OS X. But once you start to use Mac, you’ll never want to switch back to Windows.

  30. thorpy
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:04

    Wot no seeders ? Max someone has it 8% ?

  31. foolala
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:05

    Thank you for this!

  32. thorpy
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:09

    Thank you for what ? 10% of an ISO?

  33. Rob
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:10

    lol wut:
    Dell Inspiron 1720 – 17″ – $1674
    -Intel® Core™ 2 Duo T7700 (2.4GHz/800Mhz FSB/4MB cache)
    -Genuine Windows Vista® Home Premium Edition
    -2GB Shared Dual Channel DDR2 at 667MHz
    -320GB SATA Hard Drive (5400RPM)
    -256MB NVIDIA® GeForce® 8600M GT
    -CD / DVD writer (DVD+/-RW Drive)
    -Dell Wireless 1390 802.11g Mini-Card
    -Built-in Bluetooth capability (2.0 EDR)-High Definition Audio 2.0
    -Weight: 7.6 pounds

    Apple MacBook Pro (17″ ) – $2,949.00
    -2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 4MB L2 cache
    -Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger
    -2GB (two SO-DIMMs) of PC2-5300 (667MHz) DDR2
    -250GB Serial ATA Drive @ 4200 rpm
    -256MB NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
    -SuperDrive 8x (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)
    -AirPort Extreme Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g/n)
    -Built-in Bluetooth 2.0+EDR (Enhanced Data Rate)
    -Integrated Audio
    -Weight: 6.8 pounds

  34. p-J
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:10

    NZB!

    http://www.newzleech.com/usenet/?p=2587364

  35. mac user
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:23

    mac benefits:

    - you cant play most games, and also many other software … pc users are so dumb, they can play all games and software.
    - if you want to upgrade, buy a new mac, only idiot pc users upgrade by only buying the few needed hardware…. why do it cheap if you can do it more expensive, i mean if your car gets a flat tire, dont you buy a new car too?
    - its too expensive, why not pay almost 2 times more for the same performance?
    - we mac users can sniff the corks up our bums and pretend our sh1t doesnt smell bad.

    we mac users are uber smart and nobody can understand our amazing way of reasoning…

  36. a
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:29

    Do I need a Mac to run it?

  37. Mike staff member
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:31

    maybe in the future ill try a mac

  38. vinylly
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:38

    Anybody have Rapidshare links of this ….!?

  39. sam
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:42

    maybe when I care more about style over substance I’ll buy a Mac. Until then, have fun with your cute little computer, trendwhores.

  40. ihater
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:48

    A Mac is exactly like the ipod….A good looking overpriced item,that compared to other products looses in the most important things…performance and value …..but the damn ifans or idumbasses still buy it because its like hot! like way popular!……godd

    Just next time a new ipod or mac comes along….compare it to the competition and see who ends up winning……….honestly if you see a mac doing something better than a common pc tell me, coz I haven’t seen it.

  41. mino
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:51

    @41 Do you either make music, edit video or use photoshop etc…….these are the only reasons why you would need upgrades etc, do you really need the latest and greatest processor to post on forums and sites like these…

  42. Jumbo
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:51

    You theory, idiot, has been proven by most companies, who try and sweat but always loose. :)

  43. mino
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:52

    @41 Do you either make music, edit video or use photoshop etc…….these are the only reasons why you would need upgrades, do you really need the latest and greatest processor to post on forums and sites like these…oh wait….you’re a 14yrold warcraft freak

  44. ipimp
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:53

    42……..so tell me what mp3 player comes near the touch

  45. rollo
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:53

    @41: honestly, you don’t know what you’re missing…

    that being said, i was a mac hater until 2003.

  46. The_doctor
    October 23rd, 2007 | 21:59

    @38 – look for osx86 project, that is the PC version.

    At everyone else. Mac is mostly a hardware company, that is what they do best and they make some damn nice systems. in fact, a lot of people buy Macs just to run Windows. Like the imac, that thing is pure style, aluminum and silicon oxide and NO mess. Sony has something similar, but, well, it sucks. I have been through the benchmarks, even the puny mac mini can take down most of your other brands as far as Vista Performance, and the Imac is beter than your higher end PC’s, then the mac Pro is well…. a BEAST that alienware will NEVER come close to. Come on, an 8-core Xeon desktop!

    Also, $149 is the retail price for leopard, that is the Ultimate edition.. because well, they don’t have other options… OS X is also nice because it runs fine on older systems, so no pressure to upgrade and no activation, apple just trusts you :)

  47. macattack
    October 23rd, 2007 | 22:06

    us mac owners understand that mac and pc are two completely different things, for one mac is pretty much virus free, the pc…lets not spit out how many viruses are created for those.

    Mac can run windows fluently, has the best look, we all know that Vista just tried to copy Macs form,but…failed to make it even near as good as Mac.

    with Leopard we could retrieve files from 2 years back with ease, with windows you can’t ever find a file.

    Mac’s are innovative, sexy, worth the money, and the best thing…you never have to use the common Windows alt, control, delete, why? because Macs never go bogus on its users.

  48. macattack
    October 23rd, 2007 | 22:10

    did I forget to mention that the battery life on macs are amazing, compared to any other laptop out there? its true.

  49. xw0lf
    October 23rd, 2007 | 22:20

    can i install that at my desktop PC.. or need “something”?

  50. dudeman
    October 23rd, 2007 | 22:40

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clYOR8vLgE8

  51. ijj
    October 23rd, 2007 | 23:11

    In case you need an Usenet account to leech this thing, go here (10 GB free trial available at the moment!): http://www.giganews.com/?a=binabled2

  52. Smell your own
    October 23rd, 2007 | 23:15

    Smug Alert!
    Mac owers remind me of the South Park episode where everyone bought Pious and Hindsight hybrid cars
    So smug.

  53. rlslog
    October 23rd, 2007 | 23:20

    so, what do I need to burn .dmg files?????

  54. the RaGE
    October 23rd, 2007 | 23:23

    I got a pc, but i’ll switch to a mac coz the ultimate reason to buy a MAC- you’ll never feel cheated 2 years down the line. i bought my fujitsu-siemens amilo july 2006 when the dual core came (when it was still centrino duo, not pentium duo) for £700, now it “normally costs £350 in stores and £250 on ebay. The macbook pro still costs £1700 a year down the line!!

  55. Moron Gates
    October 23rd, 2007 | 23:53

    Burn it on a Windows PC? You need Macdrive.
    Burn it on a MAC? Right click >> Burn

    BTW, all the morons can hate Macs and love Windows and gates. They cannot even put out a working thing. IE .Net 3.0. I cannot even be installed on XP.

  56. LOTG
    October 24th, 2007 | 00:06

    Well you must be doing something really wrong, It just installs on my PC’s.

  57. jake
    October 24th, 2007 | 00:24

    @ 56, same with the ipod, unless you go to places like futureshop or bestbuy and buy it like $200 cheaper. And yes, I am a PC/vista user…u could use more ram, but what do i need it for…?,.,,,,the only reason you could possibly need this Leopard os, is if you NEED to run some fancy photo or movie editing software…with over 300 new ‘upgrades’ (spam) …hippocrates’s, who claim a pc comes with spam programs…i could go on and on….

  58. me
    October 24th, 2007 | 00:33

    Damn this is big i think i prefer paying up 130 Euros instead of downloading 6,5GB lol!

  59. iwishiwascool
    October 24th, 2007 | 02:13

    i would buy a mac if i needed one…that being said…the only reason to need to get a mac is if your profession requires one…photo/video etc. other than that…you are throwing away money for no reason at all…btw…what is the % of Mac users compared to PC? :)

  60. iMiKE
    October 24th, 2007 | 02:30

    I like macs and also like macosx

    and this version supports intel CPUs or not?

  61. OMG
    October 24th, 2007 | 02:44

    Wow this has gone out of control. Anybody who uses Windows and thinks it’s the best, just don’t even waste your time Mac fellow users couldn’t care less we know that our os is well on the other side of the lake, still waiting for windows to play catch up and Vista what a poor atemp of an OS, laughable even worse the Zune.. Good god even you think companies like creative do better MP3 Players then apple is that why the iPods are winning hands down, never like creative will never use a creative MP3 i’m happy with my MacBook, iMac & and iPhone, and can’t wait for Leopard

    Shame to say i have windows XP on my computers i need it for one or two minor things, sure even XP is better then Vista, i’m soo glad they wasted billions on development on vista, lololol

  62. Bomberman
    October 24th, 2007 | 03:04

    Before I install Leopard, has there been any problems or things I should know about? I’m always paranoid when downloading operating systems off the internet.. Thanks.

  63. PooHead
    October 24th, 2007 | 03:45

    Anyone tried installing this on a PC using MS Virtual PC 2007?

  64. the king
    October 24th, 2007 | 03:50

    umm… so do we just burn the dmg file onto a dl?

    this can’t be bootable?

    someone please enlighten.

  65. flipside
    October 24th, 2007 | 03:55

    yeh i tried to load the dmg file on my external drive and it openned fine. but the installers asks to restart to start the installation.. i didn’ go through with it cuz it would probaby not boot from the external. I guess i’ll run to get some DL DVDs tomorrow morning.

  66. the king
    October 24th, 2007 | 04:21

    so if this is burned onto a dl disk, it’ll be bootable? i am new to mac, so help is greatly appreciated.

  67. Psyclear
    October 24th, 2007 | 04:33

    hehe, awesome up. I’d down it but I get it for free legit at work this Friday. Tempting not to wait though.

  68. wheeee
    October 24th, 2007 | 04:33

    yeah it should be, generally these discs are formatted for booting now instead of having you do it manually. Even on the hacked discs it works that way.

    You should be set once you get the file.

  69. Aristoteles
    October 24th, 2007 | 05:05

    http://www.mac-sucks.com/switch_why.php

  70. the king
    October 24th, 2007 | 05:16

    is there a program i am suppose to burn the dmg file with? i burned with nero and it’s not working =(

    btw, i don’t have a d/l burner on my mac… so any recommendation has to be made for pc burning apps.

  71. tucker
    October 24th, 2007 | 05:36

    wtf this works with PCs??

  72. the king
    October 24th, 2007 | 05:49

    before i confuse more poor souls… i meant that i only have dl burner on my pc, therefore, i would need to burn it using my pc.

    i am not having luck converting using dmg2iso… giving me error.

  73. smaugthewyrm
    October 24th, 2007 | 05:53

    mac users:
    easiest solution:
    applications/utilities/Disk Utility.app

    use this application to restore your newly downloaded diskimage to a partition of an external harddrive.
    also, double click the diskimage and NOTE ITS EXACT NAME, you must rename the external harddrive partition the exact thing.

    restart your mac holding the OPTION KEY DOWN

    choose the external partition when asked.

    install normally.

    WINTEL USERS:
    http://www.hackint0sh.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=18

    this site is dedicated to installing macosx on homebuilt computers using misc. mobos, vid cards, processors, etc.

    enjoy!

  74. peter01
    October 24th, 2007 | 05:56

    Anyone has Rapidshare link to download? Thanks a bunch!

  75. Moron Gates
    October 24th, 2007 | 09:01

    @72

    Nice link: a full page of google ads.

    My respect to the talented webmaster. SHould have ben using a Mac!!

    BTW, you ARE a forced idiot.

  76. revert
    October 24th, 2007 | 10:54

    I would also like rapidshare links if possible. That mac-sucks website it a load of bull.

  77. indianpunk
    October 24th, 2007 | 12:23

    @37 totally digg ur stuff

    i’d rather buy a HP blackbird than this sh!tty apple crap
    i know whats in my pc from start to end and i can do with it whatever i can and not like apple crying always and asking for sh!tty stuff for lame parts

    u rich kids with daddy’s hard earned money can enjoy ur mac books we’re happy with our self made monsters and yes i dont remember the last time my windows XP sp2 crashed so thier no superior sh*t mac claims
    and did i forget we have three new fps coming next week
    FEAR Expansion pack,COD 4,And GEARS OF WAR :)

    Die Apple Die………………..

  78. revert
    October 24th, 2007 | 12:44

    Do Macs get viruses indianpunk? No, they don’t. Because viruses for mac don’t exist.

    Now, the last time I checked my PC for viruses with Norton (antivirus software that isn’t neccessary for Macs) I found over 1,500.

    Lastly, maybe the reason you don’t understand why Macs are better machines than PCs is because (1) you can’t use grammar correctly, and (2) you can’t back up your arguments with any evidence other than swears. Oh, and Die Apple Die at the end…I bet you have never even used a Mac.

  79. revert
    October 24th, 2007 | 14:04

    Leopard Rapidshare Links: http://rapidshare.com/users/3JAGMF

  80. revert
    October 24th, 2007 | 14:05

    Password = wzorfan

  81. Kex0
    October 24th, 2007 | 14:52

    Omg post if you has something to say (related to topic)
    Go to some playground to argue what is better Mac or Not Mac..

    it’s everybodys choice.. Just reading those noob posts makes me sick..

    I do not like that apple is so sooooo closed software. I preffer tunig up things SW & HW.. Something that Mac is not good at.. But quality yes it’s worth price.. For some kido to show off.

  82. catwink
    October 24th, 2007 | 16:16

    Rapidshare Link Greatly Appreciated. Thanks revert.

  83. Olive77
    October 24th, 2007 | 18:40

    Wzor rulez!!!

    thanks a bunch, revert

  84. seamoon
    October 24th, 2007 | 22:30

    Thanks revert but what do I do with these files to convert to a iso and put on a dvd

  85. vinylly
    October 24th, 2007 | 22:55

    Cheers for the Rapid links!

  86. Liski
    October 24th, 2007 | 22:58

    What is the password for the Rapidshare folder? http://rapidshare.com/users/3JAGMF

  87. Liski
    October 24th, 2007 | 22:59

    Found it!

    Do I just burn the .dmg file a DL DVD on my PC and just boot from it on my friends Mac?

  88. UGLY
    October 25th, 2007 | 00:10

    @76 thx 4 the tip!

  89. Tdot
    October 25th, 2007 | 00:17

    Rapidshare link is a fake!
    It gives a 6GB file. The retail version is 8 or 9 GB

  90. Liski
    October 25th, 2007 | 00:40

    @Tdot

    The Torrent file is 6.56 GB

  91. Tdot
    October 25th, 2007 | 00:47

    Oh.. then why can’t you burn it onto a regular DVD? I thought you needed a dual layer DVD?

  92. Alex
    October 25th, 2007 | 00:55

    Hey, Does anyone know how to burn this with a dual layer dvd on windows? My mac doesn’t have a dual layer burner…only my PC

  93. obis
    October 25th, 2007 | 02:39

    use disk utility to convert the dmg to an iso for burning on a PC

  94. mo
    October 25th, 2007 | 03:26

    I’ve tried to unrar but I keep getting an error msg saying that .r40 and .r46 are corrupt. Is anyone else having problems unraring or am I the only one? And yes, I have tried redownloading these two files several times.

  95. Liski
    October 25th, 2007 | 04:47

    I’ve downloaded it on my XP so I can convert from .dmg to .iso with MagicISO so I can then burn to a DL DVD so I can install it on my friends Mac but MagicISO keeps saying “Can’t find the file or file isn’t CD image file!”

  96. wheee
    October 25th, 2007 | 06:16

    according to a guy down in the 50’s he said for XP your best bet for burning is macdrive. I’d say look into it and see if you get any benefits.

  97. the king
    October 25th, 2007 | 08:55

    man… this is such a nightmare… i been working on it on and off the whole day…

    what i have done so far is covert to iso (renaming cdr extension) and in the process of transferring to pc. a word of warning, mac has a 4 gig size limit, which i found out the hard way… after wasting a ton of time.

    so i am using stuffit to segment, which is taking “another” forever…

  98. rptks!
    October 25th, 2007 | 09:27

    @100

    *Mac* has no 4Gig size limit. FAT32 has. And as of know, this is the easiest way to share between Mac & PC. But for bigger files, try chopping it down or use samba to get the file across.

    @ All Mac haters,

    I was not too fond of macs too, with their own fiddling, the claims they *could not be compared* to PC’s, and that sort of crap. Now they have Intel’s, much of that eerie magic has gone. Being able to run Windows natively in bootcamp, and those virtualisation programs (which I use none) made the Mac mature. But you’ll find yourself keep booting OSX, because that’s simply why the Mac is worth the money. It works bloody great. And that was Tiger.. let’s go Leopard!

    Don’t wanna flame, but come on PC buddies.. you have Vista now. That is the crappiest thing there ever was. I’m a true XP-guru, and the few hours I have been working on Vista have been an absolute nightmare.

  99. SH&E
    October 25th, 2007 | 09:50

    Could somebody tell me if this is just another blank DMG or whether it’s the real deal. As in the final GM release candidate??? Thanks.

  100. nonabelian
    October 25th, 2007 | 10:03

    This is Build 9A581 and is the GM. Works great too.

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Leave a reply