Comments on: AMD introduces Puma, laptop solution

By: LappyUser

LappyUser — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:29:04 +0000

@4
totally agree with you. One of the main reasons Intel was beating AMD was because they offered longer battery life, even if their graphics did suck.

By: Jafo

Jafo — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:29:10 +0000

Another
Mega
Disaster

By: J3ph_42

J3ph_42 — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:08:50 +0000

While CPU performance is likely to be lesser, laptop users will never notice THAT. What they will notice is power consumption, so we’ll have to see there. Outdoing Intel graphics isn’t much of a feat since Intel graphics have been consistently the lowest performing GPUs (albeit the most popular due to cost).

By: name (required) email ( will not be shown ) (required) Spam protection: Sum of 1 + 9 ?

Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:21:43 +0000

just pick you side and don’t annoy who picks the other side.

By: Mustansir

Mustansir — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:36:45 +0000

AMD will sure leave intel in the dust when it comes to built in graphics solution but can’t say about performance….

By: havven

havven — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:15:07 +0000

Intel is leaving AMD in the dust…