Releaselog

Amateur Strip Nite Bare All PPV DSRip XviD-aAF

aAF releases yet again another TV rip with sexy situations. Adult film actress Felicia Fox (36D-25-36) hosts an amateur strip night, where five regular girls perform in a nude strip off. There is a prize for the winner, which we don’t know yet. More snaps maybe later.

Porn star Felicia Fox hosts a contest in which five regular girls who have never stripped before compete for the grand prize in an ALL NUDE strip-off.

Amateur.Strip.Nite.Bare.All.PPV.DSRip.XviD-aAF
512×384 29 53m – mp3 vbr 128 – 350MB
TorrentNFO

Comments (208)

Feel free to post your Amateur Strip Nite Bare All PPV DSRip XviD-aAF torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, megaupload, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. hackzy
    November 3rd, 2007 | 01:49

    mr. x stop posting this crap

  2. boast
    November 3rd, 2007 | 01:51

    another fine title from…

    RLSLOAD.net

  3. hackzy
    November 3rd, 2007 | 01:51

    no one wants to watch cheap porn when we can get better quality more professional porn dat actually looks good

  4. November 3rd, 2007 | 01:55

    sorry fellas. TV rips are TV rips. if you don’t like it email aaf_tv@hush.com and ask them to stop.

  5. James
    November 3rd, 2007 | 01:57

    why are you posting this crap? rlslog never did before…

  6. James
    November 3rd, 2007 | 01:59

    How do you contact rlslog staff for suggestions on what to post on website. I dont see a contact link?

  7. tom
    November 3rd, 2007 | 01:59

    loads of nudy rips appearing lately.. is it that time of the month!

    are these uk or us releases ?

  8. steven
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:02

    why would people watch this when they can find real porn elsewhere this site shouldnt even have porn i come here for movies and tv shows not porn i get porn at empornium

  9. mike
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:03

    Glad to see im not alone on this. I can understand trying to expand reviews to generate traffic. But put a link to those specific reviews, then place related ads on that page. Will allow all of us to get the reviews we want, without worry.

    I have nothing against porn, and to those of you that argue this isnt porn, watch it with your family. It is a conglomerate of Nude scenes. anyways…..

    If you want to increase traffic and generate interest in your review…. review higher end porn with recognizable stars. You know, the porn people might actually be looking for.

    Just a thought

  10. Gundy
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:11

    I don’t like Battlestar Galactica (the original and the new soap opera). Does that mean RLSLOG needs to make seperate links to those?

    If you don’t like the adult releases, don’t download them. None of the images they post are explicit in the slightest. Although, I can see the problem, since it obviously takes more effort to just say “Oy, another adult release. Oh well” than it does to complain in the comments section.

  11. HollyWood
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:16

    lol another one – but Mr.X is right tv rips are tv rips

    to all: yes you can’t watch it with you family but is still not p*rn so take it easy…

    good thing there is NO snapshots.

  12. November 3rd, 2007 | 02:17

    It’s not really adult. It’s Pay-Per-View TV that you get to watch for free thanks to aAF.

  13. Roflcer of the Lawl
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:17

    Hah don’t use that excuse you like posting this stuff. It’s not going well with the community so you should probably stop, you know, we get it you found boobs and wanna share it with everyone. Congratulations, much more boobs in your future so move on please.

  14. rushn1
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:18

    Please post REAL PRON!

  15. Jaques
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:22

    You suck Mr. X.
    at least the screencap is ’safe for work’
    hope youre getting your jollies from posting this crap.

  16. robespierre
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:29

    totally disagree with mr.x (staff)

    you dont post all tv rips available ,you choose them,to answer someone
    else above,

    you seem to enjoy controversy,and posting real scrap,loosing all the respect
    i had,,for a kid

  17. Nikky
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:36

    Man, I normally open rslog in front of my family. I was shocked when I saw the bikini destination or w/e screenshot in the front page , before they removed it. I had to quickly change the page! :@ Rslog, don’t go so cheap.

  18. aerowen
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:37

    I agree, rlslog doesn’t post all releases that come out, not in tv or in any category. Hiding behind the “sorry tvrips are tvrips” is a bit silly.
    I get it though, it’s the content… the xxx, porn, stripping, nude -words. They generate hits, it’s just the “sex sells” idea innit. So yay, you’ve gotten a new server, and facilitated the boost in hits. I even helped a little, can we drop the crap releases now?

  19. jack white
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:38

    just cos you guys dont like it doesent mean other people wont, not everyone is in to hardcore porn, i myself love hardcore porn but i understand its not for everyone, rlslog is about variety and at least someone took the time and effort to upload it, so come on guys stop acting like babies and just be thankfull for the choice. i mean if you think you can do better then start your own scene website up………no thought not.

  20. mike
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:44

    seems like most people aren’t into it. How about a survey of users? let the people that are generating the traffic decide.

    how about simple for or against…….

    personally, i am against

  21. Me (staff)
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:51

    man what the hell this is turning into a porn scene site….
    martin do something…

  22. none
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:52

    ya a poll would be intereasting ……. although i dont see why everyones complaining for , its not proper porn nor is there offensive pictures up, im not downloading this but id rather see it than that beauty and the geek crap that gets posted

  23. :(
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:56

    i agree with mike… put a survey in the front page and see what people want…
    u disappointed me Mr.X :(

  24. hello
    November 3rd, 2007 | 02:58

    @ none if you visted this site yesterday you would of seen the nude screenshot on front page….
    and guess what my little brother saw it too :(

  25. MeAD
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:03

    no pr0n please. some of us read this site at work. this is a big problem for me. i work for myself, so i automatically know i used company equipment for pr0n … if this continues, i might fire myself!

  26. devnull
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:09

    Another vote here for no smut. If people want smut there is not shortage of other (better) places to go.

  27. zedkhov
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:10

    give your heads a shake.

    Your little bro saw some boobs on your screen? I bet your the same type of person that flips out at a pair of breasts but doesn’t even flinch at the site of gore and violence. You should be working for the american censorship board.

    Your morals are not the same as everyone elses. Neither are your values. So why should the site change to accomidate you? because your morals and values are clearly right? because yours are clearly superior to others? think about it.

    And to really point out the hypocrisy in your posts.

    Your complaining about nudity on the website because i assume you find it offensive or immoral to view, or whatever reason you may have…but you have no problem coming to the site for information on downloading illegal content onto your computer…So your fine with stealing…but some breasts crosses the line…

    unbelievable

  28. Cremo
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:23

    c’mon mistaX. i really must say that it turned me a bit off when i saw u posting those softcore stuff for a few days now. i thought, it was just a onetime crap, but u still posting it after so many complaints from other users. in my opinion, if rlslog is gonna post things like that, it will become ‘just another rls page’ nothin else, and not the #1 quality rls log ;) so if someone could pliz put a survey in the front page, yall gon see in notime what we really luv u for, and i bet it aint the pron rlses (soft or not) u post.

    thank u

  29. hello
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:24

    @ zedkhov
    so u find nudity appropriate for a little 7 year old boy?

  30. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:26

    if your complaining about piracy what r u doin on rlslog then?

  31. November 3rd, 2007 | 03:27

    yes because just 6 year ago he was suckin his moms breasts.

  32. mike
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:29

    I don’t find nudity offensive at all. I actually prefer it to most of the crap on tv.

    However, it this site is good for one thing, its finding good early releases of major and good independent titles AMONG all the garbage torrents out there.

    I respect the fact that a AF is ripping and loading torrents, however they are truly nothing to write about. Porn is porn. Its everywhere, and there is really no need to review it. it all ends the same way.

    And as far as giving family as coworkers seeing the screen, it is a big deal to alot of people….

    Also, if we want this scene to become a “legal” form of media dispersal, we have to tread lighty, and stay respectable.

    Do you think reviewing porn on a site with no declaration or disclaimer of content to ward off underage kids is a good idea?

    It just gives the Riaa and FBI more ammo against rlslog. use your heads and listen to the people that frequent this site, before they move on.. We are a fickle bunch you know

  33. a
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:30

    exactly its PPV not a TV show, it needs its own section…

  34. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:31

    @ Mr.X i bet u r so obsessed with porn that u find it appropriate for a 7 yr old what a shame

  35. November 3rd, 2007 | 03:33

    it’s softcore. perfectly acceptable by today’s standards.

  36. November 3rd, 2007 | 03:36

    and BTW we also post movies here that contain wild amounts of violence and gore, and the occasional nudity scene. shocking news flash.

  37. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:36

    what kinda standards r u talking about?… you would’nt know because as i mentioned before you’re obsessed with porn

  38. mlr
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:37

    Well said zedkhov :D

    BTW I dont mind some porn ;)

  39. mike
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:37

    lets see how acceptable…. how about a survey?

  40. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:39

    can we just have a survey and end this argument. Mr.X u start one because it ur fault :P

  41. mlr
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:40

    hey lol obsessed with porn is better than obsessed with nasty horror flicks with blood,violence & gore

  42. zedkhov
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:42

    I didnt say that now did i.

    I implied you come to this site at your own risk. This is a morally open site and you take the risks coming to it. I dont check this site at work because of the fact that some may find whatever content be on the main page questionable. be it a pair of breasts or a rip of a dvd that hasnt even come out in the theatres yet. and yes there are people of both types out there.

    Instead of whineing that you can’t view this stuff at work maybe question the fact that your on a website for downloading illegal material while your supposed to be working.

    I just find all the hypocrisy hear astounding

  43. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:45

    i agree with u zedkhov but it was first time that i find crap on this site.

  44. me
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:46

    The beginning of the end for Mr X. We don’t come here for porn.

  45. you
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:56

    Mr. X hasn’t posted any porn.

  46. robespierre
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:56

    read the FAQ
    Q: What’s this website about?,,ect ect

    so i dont find any of mr.xxx arguments to post this in here,undercover
    softporn,maybe,but you are contrary to the first (if not the first) dedicated to covering Scene releases in more detail,,ect ect from faq again

    mr xxx is having fun,,,looks like he is approoved by the admin,

    same with deciding who and what is racism comments in here

    this site rant is some of the worse in the fields,,,run by kids

    i agree that we are here to look for illegal post and info of rips available

    but i am not here to read the childhish review of someone hiding behind
    arguments,that someone else post it,or its better than the news

  47. Gotbannedcosofname
    November 3rd, 2007 | 03:58

    All this whining is doing my head in…

    Rlslog posts scene releases.. that’s the point for it’s being. This is a scene release so ergo it gets posted.

    @ 17.. so theft is fine in your house, but god forbid anyone catch a glimps of boobies?

    @ 29.. I find it more appropriate than bringing the kid up to think stealing is ok…

    I think all of your “principal”, if that’s what they can be called, are utterly out of whack.

    Mr. X.. please post more of this kind of thing.. just to p*** them all off.

  48. B_FROM_THE_D
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:00

    I dont see the big problem here either read the review of a post and dl it or if its not your kind of thing dont even bother with it. u people are making a big deal out of nothing. I enjoy the variety of stuff here at rlslog. If i run across a rock cd on here im not going to take the time to diss it in comments just cause i dont like it. Just leave it well enpigh alone if its not in your taste. and whys a 7yr old here anyways TEACHING piracy at a early age now are we. Good job Mr.X keep up the good work :)

  49. passer
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:04

    keep them coming mr.x, i love softcorish

  50. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:10

    and who said the the 7 yr old was on this site?…. he was just passing infront of the computer and look at it
    you guys are such low lifes

  51. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:11

    just put a da*n poll on the frond page

  52. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:12

    front*

  53. leet
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:25

    Stop whining !!!

    If you don’t like the content of this site then go somewhere else.

    This is not a family site for little kiddies !

  54. Affar
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:26

    PLZ stop this nonsense.

    This is a release blog not an XXX.

    The last thing I want is this site to be blocked from my work :(

  55. nofnway
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:29

    did MR X really just block me from commenting because i didnt agree with him?

  56. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:30

    if u want porn go somewhere else, u’ll find heaps
    let’s just stick to scene releases here not p0rn

  57. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:32

    i dont think so. if he needs to ban someone it should be me ;P

  58. leet
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:35

    Stop calling this porn you twit and get a life!

  59. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:36

    WTF is wrong with you, people? Leave Mr.X alone. He did absolutely nothing wrong nor questionable. The argument has been tossed in earlier, but I’ll mention it as well: porn is no worse than killing or stealing or any other no-no from the ten commandments. Actually it’s the least of all evils. And it’s perfectly natural to see a pair of tits, for god’s sake, the national geographic channel broadcasts a show about some african tribes whose women are bare-breasted at noon so everyone can see it! Should you scoff at them as well? You lowlife hypocrites.

  60. hey
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:36

    if someone gets banned just use a proxy site

  61. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:39

    And another thing: “I want this to remain safe for work, so get this out of here” ?!
    LISTEN TO YOURSELVES, IDIOTS!
    You are AT WORK. And yet, you find it safe to browse non-work related websites, plus, you frequent a site that blogs pirated software, music and movies! Now that’s REAL SAFE, yes sir!
    I cannot believe the depth to which your values and reason have sunk. For shame.

  62. nofnway
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:40

    why is this “not a family site for kiddies” What we all want in the end is for this scene to not have a stigma attached to it. We should all want it be family friendly, christian friendly, elderly friendly, etc. Its the only way, in the end, that this scene is going to become the norm, not the exception. Porn just turns those people away and makes us look worse.

    Posting porn is not the way to make that happen. And you are just begging to get this shut down if you make softcore porn accessible to kids without an age certification barrier.

    Use your heads and grow the scene, don’t limit it

  63. content_sucks
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:43

    I am disgruntled by the content of this site as of late. Often times in the past I would check this site from work but with the explicit links and a shift in content I am inclined to look elsewhere. Thanks, but no thanks Mr. X. Please put this crap somewhere else.

  64. leet
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:43

    This is a site that offers illegal Pirated releases its NOT a Cristian family site and it never will be ‘!!!

    STOP CALLING NAKED WOMEN PORN YOU TWIT !!!

  65. nofnway
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:48

    pornography

    Main Entry:
    por·nog·ra·phy
    Pronunciation:
    \-fē\
    Function:
    noun
    Etymology:
    Greek pornographos, adjective, writing about prostitutes, from pornē prostitute + graphein to write; akin to Greek pernanai to sell, poros journey — more at fare, carve
    Date:
    1858
    1 : the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement
    2 : material (as books or a photograph) that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement

    definition of pornography…… so stop calling it not pornography, you twit

  66. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:48

    @62, nofnway
    Dear god I do hope you are trolling.

    How is it Christian to steal?!
    This isn’t simple sharing because the AUTHORS of the shared material do not want it to be freely accessible!

    ELDERLY FRIENDLY?! WHAT THE FÜCK ARE YOU ON ABOUT?

    If you’re gonna be honest and name things as they really are (and you do just that by calling this porn), then please, PLEASE do not call yourself a Christian, because YOU ARE NOT.
    If you were, you wouldn’t be here.

    The Scene doesn’t want to become norm, it has no intention of spreading itself or becoming accessible to the masses. Why would you even think that is beyond me. It is not our job to judge them, it is not our position to “spread the word”…
    We are simple lamers, leeching someone’s hard work as a means for an idealistic end. I can understand their bitterness toward p2p now… Thank you for making it clear to me.

    NOW STFU ALREADY!

  67. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:48

    so you people call this people for adults??…
    what would a simpsons movie be doin here and the bee movie game.
    ffs have some sense in ur comments
    and if you Mr.X insist to post such tv rips make a subcategory under tvrips and don’t post it on front page

  68. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:50

    correction*
    so you people call this blog for adults??…
    what would a simpsons movie be doin here and the bee movie game.
    ffs have some sense in ur comments
    and if you Mr.X insist to post such tv rips make a subcategory under tvrips and don’t post it on front page

  69. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:52

    @ Anon-e-Moose
    that means you shouldnt be here either lol

  70. nofnway
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:52

    actually this site doesn’t offer illegal pirated releases, it simply reviews them, twit.

    and making the scene inaccessible to people who don’t find it morally questionable by ADDING reviews of things we know they will find morally offensive works against it in every way twit

  71. nofnway
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:58

    Riaa wanted to keep tape players and vcrs from having record buttons in the 80’s because of this same thing. They shut up because everyone wanted to use that function. Didnt want people to pirate songs off the radio. Same thing here, consider yourself special and keep the scene small, and keep it illegal.
    Fact is, this scene will grow if we make it easy for newcomers to find media and easily aquire it.

  72. leet
    November 3rd, 2007 | 04:59

    Get over it or get lost

    You need to come out of you hole and interact with woman maybe you would realise that naked woman are not morally offensive you twit.

  73. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:01

    @69, lol

    No, that means I know my place, and I accept the facts as they stand. A concept I imagine is unfathomable to the likes of you.

    I do not consider myself a Christian, nor do I believe what I’m doing here is wrong. My thoughts concerning all things digital is that they should be free, for the betterment of humankind.

    I do not comfort myself with this, though, I know I’m stealing by today’s standards, and I am not sorry. But at least I’m not a hypocrite, and I do not pretend to be a moral beacon that everyone should follow…

  74. T.R.U.T.H.
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:05

    OMG NO ONE WANTS TO SEE THIS CRAP, STOP POSTING IT. YOU CAN CALL IT WHATEVER YOU WANT: PORN, PRON, SOFTCORE, REAL REVIEWS…what the f-u-c-k ever!!!

    Mr. X obviously has nothing better to do with his time then to surf Kazaa and Demonoid for nude ladies and posts them here thinking all of us like it…well we don’t and personally its sexest against the females.

    Just because you are horny every night Mr. X doesn’t mean all of release log is too- stop posting this s h i t.

  75. More T.R.U.T.H.
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:07

    I agree! With all these pathetic wannabe pron posts I’m starting to think Mr. X enjoys touching his body: rubbing his nipples, fingering his ass, swirling his hair…maybe all these posts are just his way of him dealing with the fact that he wants to be one of these ladies.

  76. And Nothing But The T.R.U.T.H.
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:08

    Who download’s this stuff anyway? First of all if you want to see “pron” you can see it free online anywhere- even at pay sites. Anyone who has to pay for porn or download a huge MB/GB file of it just for one jerk clearly doesn’t know the internet very well.

  77. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:10

    @70, nofnway:

    You love lying to yourself. Of course it offers a way of acquiring illegal goods, you simply copy & paste the name of the release into google’s search form and voilla – loads of ways to down that elusive not-yet-in-the-movies movie…

    Nothing works against the Scene because it’s members firmly decided they will not be a part of any broad community other than the Scene itself. Couriers from topsites are usually the ones responsible for the releases leaking into public. That process will not stop nor accelerate, it will keep on happening the way it does, regardless of our actions. Get that into your mind, will you?

    @71, nofnway:

    So, mass request and mass approval will make things acceptable?
    Well, perhaps, on a large scale… 80% of the people of the World voting yes on the Scene becoming accepted would do the trick. Probably…
    But then again, that still doesn’t make stealing right. By today’s standards…
    If it did, then we could just as easily vote yes on murder.

  78. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:15

    @74, 75, 76, “truth”:

    That was very intelligent. Bravo. You hit the nail on the head.

    Ok, the question at hand is a good one, “why was this posted, to what end?”.
    Does it matter? Why was any of the posts made?
    Because it’s author felt it needed to be presented.
    His reasons are his alone.
    When you become a member of the staff, post whatever you deem worthy. As for the posts you do not like, simply save yourself some time and ignore them.

    YES, IT IS THAT SIMPLE AND EASY!

  79. Ben
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:15

    Have to disagree with Mr. X this time around. I never saw you posting about Burn Notice, why all the nudity? At least watch the screen caps. It’s getting annoying, you know you hand pick the rips, and when you have so many people complain directly to you, you should at least consider maybe going in a different direction. It’s apparent you’re doing it at this point just to piss people off.

  80. M&Ms
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:17

    stop posting there kind of topics

    ..

  81. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:18

    quotes @ Anon-e-Moose
    73″nor do I believe what I’m doing here is wrong”
    77″But then again, that still doesn’t make stealing right.”
    make up your mind.

  82. mikeynofnway
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:22

    at least some people have some sense…. so back to that user survey…….. what does everyone think?

  83. T.R.U.T.H. Be Told
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:22

    What kind of name is ” Anon-e-Moose” ?

    The author felt it needed to be presented? His reasons are not his own. MEDIA 101- the views of any station or news service must agree with their public as well- otherwise they have no audience! Mr. X should be lucky this site is useful in many ways outside this nudy lady posting c r a p because people would leave to find a better, maybe porn free, site!… Well, that’s already started.

    AND FOR PEOPLE WHO AGREE THAT THESE POSTS ARE ACCEPTABLE:

    It’s funny… I don’t see any of you downloading it, lol!

  84. leet
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:24

    And a cry came down from heaven and the seventh angel said you must all die because you had boobs in your scene release !

  85. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:25

    @81, lol:

    Ever hear of the term “context”?
    What you wanted to quote was

    “I do not consider myself a Christian, nor do I believe what I’m doing here is wrong.”

    “But then again, that still doesn’t make stealing right. By today’s standards…”

    “BY TODAY’S STANDARDS”

    Factor in: “My thoughts concerning all things digital is that they should be free, for the betterment of humankind.”
    and you will understand that I wanted to say that stealing shouldn’t exist as a concept, we should all have access to what we need. and to what is made for the masses freely. We should also all have access to what we need to survive, then no one would have to resort to stealing…

  86. Tell The T.R.U.T.H.!
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:25

    Anon-e-Moose, you speak so highly of Mr. X and his posts- maybe you should join him and find stuff to jack off together to. If you’re also a grown male with no life, but time to come here and pick on people defending legitimate posts then you and Mr. X are one in the same.

  87. mikeynofnway
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:30

    this isnt any situation for personal attacks, and i apologize for calling someone a twit.
    it isnt even something we should all be bickering about. But i think that we should all try to get rlslog to let its audience decide, because it is very obvious that some of their more loyal readers take exception to this direction.

  88. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:30

    @83, “truth”:

    My nickname is utterly irrelevant to the matters we’re discussing.

    Media 101 also has nothing to do with this, RLSlog is not a tv station. And it will always be useful to a great number of people, even if it turns porn-only. It just won’t be as useful to YOU. But then again, why should any of us give a damn about that?

    Also, how can you tell if I’m downloading this or not? You can’t.

  89. news seeker
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:32

    LOL this is softporn (just funny), but if it offends some ppl mybe it would be a good idea to have a side link in Categories for Mr.X

  90. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:35

    @86, “truth”:

    Yes, I speak highly of him because I respect his ability to make a questionable (undeservedly so) decision, and stick by it.
    I also respect him as a member of staff of one of the sites I begin and end my day with.
    His and mine personal life is of no concern to you nor is it of any relevance to this particular subject.
    Why did you take the time to bash this article?
    Is it really so much more wrong than, say, Death Proof?

  91. leet
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:35

    “I’m starting to think Mr. X enjoys touching his body: rubbing his nipples, fingering his ass, swirling his hair”

    Your fantasies are much worse than anything Mr. X ever posted…
    Hippocratic ! first you complain about this post and then you post something disgusting like that ?

  92. Danke
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:35

    “We should all want it be family friendly, christian friendly, elderly friendly, etc.”

    You lame, ignorant, Yankee, putz! You place Christianity in a sentence with core values such as family, friendly etc. What if someone is utterly disgusted with your chosen religion being thrust up them? I can’t believe people such as you. You break the law by downloading illegal files, you add cracks to pirated files and then harp on about YOUR specific choice of faith and core family values? What a complete loser! Your just pathetic and completely lost.

    Thou shalt not steal? Then FO clown!

  93. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:38

    @ 88
    “it will always be useful to a GREAT number of people, even if it turns porn-only.”
    just because you have a low life looking up porn everyday doesnt mean everyone is.
    and i don’t think “GREAT” number of people agree with you.

  94. Thraprod
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:38

    Alright, time for my post on this. This should be interesting.

    First of, to the person that posted the definition of Pornography and then claimed this to be porn… by the own definition that you posted, it isn’t pornography, sorry.

    Second, I wouldn’t consider this site safe for work with or without nudity. While it may not be illegal to read about releases, even if your work doesn’t have a “no browsing for non-work purposes” policy, should they notice you on a such a site, I seriously doubt your company is going to be technically savvy enough to distinguish between this site and actual downloading. If the RIAA/MPAA can’t get it straight that torrent sites don’t host content then I doubt your work will if you work for a big company. If nothing else they could use it as a case against your character (eg. “This person obviously has connections to what we feel are immoral activities. We are concerned what else he may be involved with and do not want someone involved in such activities working for our company.”).

    Third, the kid issue. The Scene will -never- be “family friendly”. However, I would say that it all comes down to a case-by-case basis. If the child is young enough, I’d say they are not going to understand what is on the screen enough know you’re dealing with downloading movies/music illegally (if you are), especially if the child cannot yet read. If they -are- old enough to read, you may have some potentially difficult questions to answer. If they are in their teens I’d say you could probably get the truth explained to them. If they are old enough to read, but not yet old enough to understand, then that’s the rough age to deal with with this sort of thing. At any rate, the concept of reviewing such tvrips should not be a problem. Tvrips ARE Tvrips, that is true, so these have just as much of a right to be posted here as anything else. I said the same thing about the Zoo documentary that caused all the controversy a while back. And incidently, softcore type of things like this can be watched by anyone that has tv channels such as Comedy Central (Yes, they do show full-frontal nudity). There’s something to think about.

    Fourth, not everyone is Christian. Not everyone wants to be Christian. I’m not. Do I dislike Christians? No. Do I dislike any religion as a whole? Nope. Do I dislike when people try to force their religious views on me? Yep. A lot. But I just tend to dislike the individual at that point, not the whole religion. So no one should ever try to make something religiously independent “Christian Friendly.”

    In conclusion, this post is perfectly acceptable for this site. If it isn’t your cup of tea, more power to you. If it IS your cup of tea, more power to you. I really don’t think the majority of people have a problem with this. I think that it’s just that, as usual, the ones with the problem are being very vocal about it. The survey/vote would be useless. I propose instead a compromise: Posts about this sort of thing should be acceptable, however blatant nudity should either be omitted from the screenshots, or at least under a “Read More” link that has a warning next to it. If what a post is about isn’t your thing? Just move on and read the next article instead. As someone stated earlier, I don’t like Battlestar Galactica, but I respect that some people like it and that it should be posted here.

    If all else fails, make a new catagory for ‘mature’ content (not porn, but Zoo and this stuff would fall under it). Make a login system (also reduces the number of people impersonating other people… not to say non-users can’t post, but user comments would be in a different color). Then you can change your settings to show, or not show, various catagories whenever you log in. Person A likes JUST movies and doesn’t care about games or tv shows… so they click the movies checkbox in their settings and nothing else. Then they only see the movie posts. Person B likes the Tech News, and everything else, but not any mature content, so they simply do not check the mature catagory and they don’t see it. This would clear up the people that complain about the tech news as well.

    If you made it all the way through this post, congratulations.

  95. sirleslo
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:42

    they need to have a family filter on this site if there going to adult stuff.

  96. T.R.U.T.H. in the end!
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:44

    Oh please, Anon-e-Moose, posts like mine are exactly what is born from low-brow c r a p like this. You and your boyfriend Mr. X should get used to a lot more people being mad- well you can look up and see how many are happy with this post as it is.

    So you agree with Mr. X huh? Well what exactly is the decision that he made? Humiliate himself? Lose supports? Get people mad? I never said this was a television station so read again because you sound as dumb as Mr. X but i’m sure your response to this comment will be just as stupid as anything Mr. X has put up with the phrase “sexy situations” in it.

    I’m done here, a guy like you obviously proved my #86 comment. You are just sitting here refreshing the page trying to defend the porn industry..why don’t you work for the cigarette companies too. I’m sure your talents of just sitting by and bashing people yourself could be applied there. Sit on a curb and put down anyone who says smoking is bad. Unlike you, I have a life and better things to do. I made my point with so many others.

    Oh yeah, Email me sometime when you realize that “questionable (undeservedly so) decision” was just a dumb act of insensateness. Look it up at http://www.dictionary.com if you have time, but I know you’re busy sitting there waiting to respond to this.

    Goodnight and god bless and you and the porn industry!

  97. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:47

    @93, lol:

    You really shouldn’t go judging people you do not know like that.
    It’s rude and pointless.

    I bet that at least 50% of the internet’s content is porn. I say GREAT number of people and stick by it based on this. That still doesn’t mean I want releaselog to turn into yet-another-porn-site, I am just stating that it would only lose you and maybe 50 other people as it’s audience. Good riddance it would be.

    @94, theraprod:

    I did make it trough the post, and I wish there were more people like you in the world.

  98. Kirstie Riots
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:47

    Who is Anon-e-Moose anyway? All he does is give stupid remarks to people’s posts. Is he some moderator or a guy with no life?

  99. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:50

    lets make a vote

  100. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:50

    i vote guy with no life

  101. Sam's Club
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:52

    No dumbass, I mean Anon-e-Moose – at least 50% of the internet is not porn. Do your research or get real facts before you post fake data to support your false claims. You’d be surprised to know a small percentage of the internet is composed of porn- but to horny old men with no lives like you and Mr. X i guess it’s the world.

    Oh..one more thing… you said earlier “You really shouldn’t go judging people you do not know like that.It’s rude and pointless.” – well sorry for judging you- it’s something people do everyday and it starts by just looking at you or hearing what you have to say and I guess all i’ve heard from you is a load of bullox.

  102. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:52

    no mate, i think it will lose everyone except you and a couple of low lifes

  103. Costco
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:53

    i vote TAKE IT OFF, TAKE IT OFF, TAKE IT OFF…literally.

  104. Walgreens
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:54

    I agree with “lol”.

  105. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:57

    @96, “truth”:

    Now THAT is a post. You got one thing right: he made some people angry. You know why? Change. The first porn post was a shocker, but people hoped it was a one-time thing. Now everyone is scared that porn will become more frequent here, and that it will dominate the content soon enough. This fear leads to anger and protest, yet, I assure you it is not necessary. Rlslog will stay rlslog, don’t worry about that.

    I am still annoyed by your judging me, you have no right to do so. Nor the basis for it. Porn is not disgusting, judging, imposing will onto and bashing others it!

    I am not an evil agent of porn industry, I am an evil agent of free speech, staying true to oneself, not having double standards and false morals, and having the basic decency of respecting diversity. So hate me if you must.

  106. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:58

    To moderators and staff.
    please don’t close the comments on this page unless you put up a poll/survey

  107. No More Porn
    November 3rd, 2007 | 05:58

    Please stop the porn flood, it’s getting ridiculous! It would be sad to see this awesome blog turn into a dump! It seems quite obvious that most users are against Mr. X “soft-porn” obsession. It might be “soft” but you have to be a major hypocrit to believe that it is not pornography. I am not against porn, only against porn here, at Rlslog. The people looking for porn releases should follow the PornLeecher link..

    Quality releases should be Rlslog’s #1 priority.

  108. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:00

    @ 105
    for once you got something right (only first paragraph) :P

  109. mropinion
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:04

    I think your all missing the point, it seems pretty obvious MR X has some kind of personal beef with Aaf.

    personally I think its a shame that rlslog is being used as a tool to b1tch at scene groups or air an editors personal feelings. But whatever, I’m not going to cry about it, just skip the post if it offends anyone so much.

    It’s been fun reading the comments on this release if nothing else tho.

  110. Target
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:06

    Oh stop kidding yourself Anon-e-Moose, you’re being judged because you’re putting yourself out there to be judged..just like Mr. X did when he posted this stuff.

    Second of all, you sound like an agent of the porn industry to me… “You got one thing right: he made some people angry. You know why? Change. The first porn post was a shocker, but people hoped it was a one-time thing.” …You giving us all history lessons now? what change are we afraid of? This site going downhill? You have no right to compare the first porn release to this site because this site isn’t a porn site- you may like it to be one, but most of us would prefer it stay as far away from that area as possible.

  111. mikeynofnway
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:06

    this is my last post on the subject
    first by webster definition, it is porn. It is a video whose purpose is to create sexual arousal. If you want to negate me, dont just say im wrong, prove it, but i think that is cut and dry.

    anon and others… i am not a christian nor do i share all their values. I did not assert so either, you inferred that, and inferred incorrectly. I did comment on the need for rlslog to be more open to those and other groups that may not find torrenting wrong but do find porn wrong.

    back to 94. in the end, you came to the same conclusion i did, link to it separately. I said that on line at the beginning of all this on line 9. thanks for your support.

    fact is rls is going to do whatever they want… all i wanted to do was voice my opinion as a loyal reader… i think it is unwise to post these reviews… nuff said, goodnight all

  112. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:07

    @ mropinion “just skip the post if it offends anyone so much.”
    you don’t get the point do you.
    people here are tryring to stop more of this porn flooding the site.

  113. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:10

    @110, Target:

    A history lesson from yesterday’s history…
    This isn’t the first soft porn post by Mr.X, that’s what I meant.

    And no, I have puretna, cheggit, empornium, and ed2k for my porn needs, I do not want rlslog to become a porn dump.

    And you know what? It wont, and I know it. This is why I am not afraid and bitter about this post, unlike some of you…

  114. T.R.U.T.H. Wins!
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:11

    “I am not an evil agent of porn industry, I am an evil agent of free speech, staying true to oneself, not having double standards and false morals, and having the basic decency of respecting diversity. So hate me if you must.”

    First of all, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…oh my god, HAHAHA..ahh.. ok…

    Second, you stand up for freedom of speech but posting porn on this site isn’t speech and the only signs it’s showing are Mr. X releasing content the MAJORITY DOESN’T APPROVE OF..and if you’re so high and mighty then you’ll know that means DEMOCRACY PREVAILS…NOW TAKE THIS S H I T OFF RELEASE LOG!

    You speak of morals, and respecting diversity but what the bloody heck are you defending here? What diversity is shown here? It’s porn! The only diversity in porn is to show MANY TYPES OF IT…and I think most of us don’t want to see any at all, so unless you want G a y Porn, Asian Porn, Midget Porn, Bestiality, and Your Grandma Porn don’t talk about basic decency because it doesn’t apply to this topic at all.

  115. idea
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:12

    who cares whether this is porn or not, its besides the point, these releases are crap and should even get a mention on this site, if the scene ever releases any good porn, then by all means i hope Mr.X-rated posts it, but these releases are crap, they are PPVs not TV Shows, they should have their own section, or shouldn’t be posted for the sheer fact that they aren’t worth watching by anyones standards, atleast crap movies have an imdb link for gauge whether they are worth it or not, these PPVs are weak specials that are aimed at 50yo men who don’t have the internet, and their only access to porn was on restricted cable channels…

  116. T.R.U.T.H. Stands Out
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:13

    I think you are afraid Anon-e-Moose..not of what this site will turn into, but what these people will say about you…and boy do they have a lot.

  117. mropinion
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:13

    @lol okay, and how is that working out for you?

    you realise you don’t have any say in what gets posted by the editors. If you really want to complain Email ur complaint in, all youve really done is have a page full of meaningless arguments with people about what porn is.

    but anyway im not going to get drawn into an argument with you, you already have enough people to argue with. good luck with the cause.

  118. idea
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:15

    These releases don’t need a new post everytime aAF decides to gain cheap scene points, it wouldn’t be that bad if Mr.X just posted the whole lot of them in one post, rather than flooding the blog…

  119. K-Mart
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:16

    Morals Anon-e-Moose? What morals are in coming online to download porn, let alone look at it? I guess no one is religious here, and if you are sin away defending this post and posting against this comment, it’s not like you’d care what you do anyway right? That’s why you come online for this crap.

    Oh, and thanks for sharing all the places you get porn from..I guess everyone was right about you being some old horny hag with nothing better to do then jack off to cheap pornography and defend yourself from the masses in this topic.

  120. Thraprod
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:16

    I’ll give you the fact that my basis for saying this isn’t porn is that in most ‘amateur’ competitions, the girls are so bad that it’s a comedy instead of sexually interesting…

  121. Sport's Chalet
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:18

    They need to take it to the limit…then things will get interesting.

  122. mropinion
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:18

    @118 idea,

    which i guess is why mr X is posting them , trying to point out that they are releasing such crap. it just seems a strange way to make an argument cos its making him look worse than them for most people.

  123. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:19

    Human mind is an amazing thing…

    “Hmm. He makes a good point, and it defies my reasoning. Oh, I know, I’ll go after his personality, if I can make him look bad, he’ll lose credibility and then his point will go down with him!”

    I just love this way of thinking.

  124. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:20

    @mropinion
    i would totally agree with you but theres one little problem.
    you can’t contact a moderator or a staff member by email or something.
    you have to actually post a comment

  125. Toys 'R Us
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:20

    OMG! I think just about every retail store is against this post!

    THINK OF THE CHILDREN, LORDY LORD, SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN.

  126. Toys 'R Us
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:21

    I’m sorry Anon-e-Moose…were you just talking to yourself right then?…. oh yea, human mind is amazing…

  127. Carrie Underwood
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:23

    Hey Yall, just stopped by to ask what the he-ll is an “Anon-e-Moose”? Well, I’ll catch yall later, luv!

  128. bbster
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:23

    @92… I’m a Yankee, an atheist and I’m about as far from a puritan as it gets. I like titz just as much as some of ya… but were not all 16 years old and some of us have families and yes we can’t always lock ourselves in the study… The posts I’m okay with… But are the titty pictures really necessary !!! Thank you Martin for taking that down. If it means finding another site I will… but I don’t want to, rlslog is very well done and there is a good community here… The comparisons to “Planet Terror” ect.. are irrelevant, it’s all about the pix in my opinion… I’ve seen Mr.X turn things around before, we live and learn… The namecalling is really not necessary….

  129. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:24

    @Anon-e-Moose just because you think this way it doesn’t mean that everybody thinks like that.

    man am i not bored…. hmmmm…..

  130. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:27

    @129, lol:

    “just because you think this way it doesn’t mean that everybody thinks like that.” is, in fact, an attack on my credibility.

    Translates as ‘Just because you are faulty, doesn’t mean I am’

    You just proved me right.

  131. OMG IT'S T.R.U.T.H.
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:28

    Me either! I want all 16 of my friends here to stay awake! It’s going to be a long night- you know the drill!

    T.R.U.T.H. BE OUT!

  132. T.R.U.T.H. BE OUT!
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:30

    Anon-e-Moose, he never quoted you so how do you know what he was talking about…you really are slow (i didnt say stupid because i didnt want to hurt your feelings ;)

    I think just about everyone here proved me right, lol right, and maybe even mr.opinion.

  133. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:31

    @130
    are you trying to say that every human thinks the sameway?

  134. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:33

    @133, lol:

    Yes. Every human will try to discredit the one whose opinion he cannot dispute and disprove otherwise.

  135. Are You Crazy?
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:36

    Anon-e-Moose- you make no sense at all. Why don’t you just call it a night and go to bed..just go…leave the site..go..go..no one wants you here…shooo..what the he-ll are you still doing here…do you even have a reason? GO TO BED!

  136. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:37

    if your talking sense a normal human wouldnt try to discredit u.

  137. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:38

    and offcourse your not

  138. ELCouz
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:40

    DISABLE COMMENTS with release like this !! PROBLEM SOLVED !!

  139. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:42

    @136, lol:

    That’s a bit of a paradox – If I’m talking nonsense, wouldn’t it be far easier to prove me wrong than to discredit me to disprove my point?

  140. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:45

    @139 omg do i have to go all over again just re-read the posts….

  141. Are You Crazy?
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:45

    …UMMM…NOOOO..what he said was perfect sense…Duh

  142. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:47

    you know what?
    good night…..

  143. Some Random Dude
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:49

    nite!

  144. hello
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:49

    @141
    who r u talking to?

  145. @141
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:52

    I was talking to Anon-e-Moose

  146. Anon-e-Moose
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:52

    …And that’s how I troll fágs.

    Thanks, you’ve been a great audience! :)

  147. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 06:56

    @ 146 no mate 142 wasnt me… some random
    and stfu

  148. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 07:04

    and yea its only 5 pm here so i got all evening to put you on show

  149. Thraprod
    November 3rd, 2007 | 07:05

    I think the pro’s and con’s have pretty much been covered at this point…

  150. B_FROM_THE_D
    November 3rd, 2007 | 07:22

    I hope Mr.X gets paid 10 dollars for every comment being made on his post keep up the good work and keep comment on something that offends u when all u have to do is scroll down and view next post. STOP being stupid !! if u have beef take ur assses on the mirc channel and talk to him ur self

  151. John_2821
    November 3rd, 2007 | 07:36

    i think ..Mr.X is doing nothing wrong …
    softcore porn is definitely acceptable…so is hardcore..
    evry1 has different choice !
    i guess..he shud put it in some other section …
    which aint viewable on the main page… but there is some link on the right ..to access that page…
    that wud b best for us and ppl who dun like porn..
    wat say ?

  152. John_2821
    November 3rd, 2007 | 07:37

    like there should be*

  153. basted
    November 3rd, 2007 | 07:47

    Mr. X,

    Don’t worry about them, post what you wanna post. It’s not like these people complaining are actually paying you anything so they have no right to demand anything. If they don’t already know that the internet is peppered with half naked chicks (ads, banners, etc.) and they are surprised to find something like this on rlslog.net, they need to grow up and get real.

    It’s probably not a bad idea to refrain posting boobs on the main page though, does more harm than good IMHO.

    Personally, I’m just happy that you’re posting torrents in your reviews again.

    Screw the haters and whiners, they’re just sexually frustrated.

  154. Viper
    November 3rd, 2007 | 07:55

    It seems to me that most of the RLSLOG visitors are opposed to posting softcore and/or adult content. I won’t argue what’s moral and what’s not, but if your community doesn’t want it, why are you posting it, Mr. X????

  155. OSC
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:11

    Mr. X
    Yesterday when you posted the porn with the boobies on the front page…. I was at my mother in laws house you pile of crap. I would like for the pictures to be 100% Safe for work and also if I had my way this crap wouldn’t be on the site at all so I could recommend it to anyone and they won’t think I’m sending them to a porn directory.

  156. Thraprod
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:12

    I seriously doubt that the people that have posted here complaining make up anywhere near a majority of site hits, they’re just the loud ones because they found something to complain about.

  157. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:21

    @156
    that’s why we want a poll/survey… and see what people want

  158. Skeev
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:21

    @Mr.X

    Well I hope you are happy or have gotton your jollies in some way from this post cos its started a poo storm here hasnt it.

    Most guys like naked women apart from the ones that dont simple.

    Some people dont mind what you post but others including me think its beneath the site – and if we want boobs we will go elsewhere.

    Please have a bit of sense and listen – we are not being outraged by nudity but would just prefer rethink your reasons for posting.

    This isn’t something you need to argue about or reason with everyone who disagrees – If you can piss off so many by posting a link to naked women then praps dont in the future.

  159. Thraprod
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:23

    Most people won’t vote. That’s why a survey won’t work. Solve the whole thing with a login system and filter preferences. Everyone gets what they want.

  160. open
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:27

    i see there are mostly 5-6 users talking to each other. who cares, if you dont like it here, go somewhere else. there are thousands of users, so a few dozen dont mean sheat. agree with ‘basted’, you’re not paying customers so stop demanding and complaining. i’m not going to dl this crap, but i clicked to see what was the hype you know, had like 150+ comments,.

  161. ???
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:31

    You’re stupid Thraprod. Go back to not being here.

  162. Sane 1 Among Many
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:33

    It’s so funny. One stupid dumb-ass leaves the site for the night and Thraprod takes his place, lol. Good thing the majority arent stupid or democracy would fail each time.

  163. Thraprod
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:33

    That was an educated post. *L* The site is already database driven and coded in php/asp/javascript, so a login system would hardly be difficult to implement; and it would clean up a lot of these problems.

  164. Captain Chink
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:34

    What say you Thraprod? You gobble and bits wit tea?

  165. LOL
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:35

    LOL. He is a gobble and bits isn’t he?

  166. ???
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:37

    The only *Loser* here Thraprod is you’re loser ass. Nothing educated has come out of your mouth today and a login system wouldn’t change everything if you still have to FILTER OUT WHAT’S ON THE MAIN PAGE FOR EVERYONE TO SEE. Am I right or are you stupid?

  167. Captain Jack
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:38

    Has anyone seen my thrapod? My doctor told me when I’m done peeling it out my anus to flush it down the toilet, but I’m afraid i lost it somewhere… Has anyone seen thraprod?

  168. Thraprod
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:42

    A) “*L*” is a laugh. I don’t name-call and would never call anyone a ‘loser’ or anything else. You have a right to your opinion just like I do.

    B) That easy enough. Leave everything on the main page except for the ‘mature’ and ‘tech news’ sections. The site would be completely usable without logging in, but would give the user a more interactive experience if they want to view the other stuff or only want to view certain catagories (for people who only follow Games, or only Movies, etc).

    A vote would do what? Petition to remove questionable content. Even if it’s successful you have the staff trying to determine what’s questionable and what’s not. In some cases that’s pretty clear-cut and defined, but in other cases it’s not so easy and will still result in people complaining about the gray areas.

  169. Captain Jack
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:49

    Ummm, B- if you leave everything on the main page except for the ‘mature’ content we wouldnt be in this predicament would we..furthermore I wouldn’t be talking to you.

    There are only 2 main votes that should be taken.
    1. Remove Mr. X…or if you’re so kind take him home with yourself when you log off.

    OR

    2. Vote to keep this site safe for anyone who uses it. EMPHASIS on anyone..that means taking the necessary measures whatever they may be.

    Whatever you choose, I’m sure we’ll all be happy if you take Mr. X with you anyway.
    :)

  170. Commyfuzzled
    November 3rd, 2007 | 08:50

    since when has “lol” been replaced with “L”? OMG, is ReleaseLog trying something else new that won’t work?

  171. 131214N
    November 3rd, 2007 | 09:04

    WOW
    for something supposedly soooo bad, there is one heck of an amount of comments!!!

    that kid must be walking past the comp every 5 minutes while he writes a comment in the hope of catchin another glimpse lol

    didnt see the pic in question myself so i cant really make a valid comment on whether this type of stuff needs to be off the main page or not.

    im just imagining ned flanders and his kids :)

    i dunno, complain when no posts and complain when too many….decisions, decisions, decisions

    i guess it is not too much to ask to have non explicit pics on the main page and just thumb links to the more explicit ones….for all posts. at least then if the person is lookin at them, they made the choice. ;)

    im sure this would keep everybody happy????

  172. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 09:20

    lol u just killed it 131214N

  173. lol
    November 3rd, 2007 | 09:22

    and no im not a kid im 23 yrs old

  174. morality messon 101
    November 3rd, 2007 | 09:39

    I see comments here of people who are “disgusted” because their mother-in-law or brother was watching the picture?? LOL You do realise that you are on a page containing links to illegal downloads? I would guess that’s at least a felony in most countries …. why is your mother-in-law looking at a page containing links to illegal content? And if she is, why are you whining like a 10 year old that she sees a “naughty” picture (oh my god, my brother and mother-in-law saw a picture of boobies on this illegal content site for which they could sue me if I dowloaded something else – please kill me .. now !!!) … I guess some people (i) don’t have any brains or (ii) have their priorities a bit in reverse order …

    I guess you whiners come from the US …. it shows, believe me. I’ve never seen such a strange moral behaviour. There was a post containing a link to a movie with nothing but torture scenes a while back – no comments made. There is a post about a naked dance contest and some people start whining … get a life, read some books, get rid of that deep Christian mentality … a naked body is natural, torture isn’t

  175. morality messon 101
    November 3rd, 2007 | 09:43

    Bi-tch! Shut the f u c k u p! You do realize you’re using a site stationed in the US to get your illegal downloads? Gosh, you foreigners are such whiners…it shows, believe me.

  176. The Previous Post
    November 3rd, 2007 | 09:44

    WAS NOT MADE BY morality messon 101, but someone who burned his ass.

  177. morality messon 101
    November 3rd, 2007 | 09:51

    Previous post, when you make a comment with content, I could actually stop laughing at you … Altough I doubt you could come up with a valid argument (except some “cool” comment like “burned his ass”) … go play with your doll in the backyard. I hope the sun doesn’t shine because you might catch a glimpse of some breasts and freak you out.

  178. B_FROM_THE_D
    November 3rd, 2007 | 09:53

    I am from the good ole usa and as said before there is no prob with this post look at nforce titties everywhere torrent pages titties ass everywhere wtf stfu

  179. B_FROM_THE_D
    November 3rd, 2007 | 09:55

    /ME JUST STROKES HIS JOHNSON AT THESE COMMENTS LOL WATCH MR HANDS THATS A GOOD ONE thanks mr.x :)

  180. John Baker
    November 3rd, 2007 | 09:58

    Thank You for posting mr.x keep em coming :D

  181. mo rubbish
    November 3rd, 2007 | 10:05

    this sucks again, i cant believe mr x hasnt taken a hint, is martin on holiday or something? wouldnt 180 comments tell you something. the responses people are giving are simple sorting the adults from the kids.

  182. net police
    November 3rd, 2007 | 10:21

    folks,

    Net-police is here, Seems Mr.X personally wants some soft core here and has some deal with admin owner to keep shut and approve or is providing him weekly bribes, Mr.X – As ure not going to suppress ur new aaf releases – we request you categorize them into Softcore releases in new category and not include in overall thread,
    ***** THIS IS THE ONLY OPTIMAL SOLUTION FOR ALL OF US SOFTCORE-BELIEVERS – SITE ADMINS – ANTI-ADULT STRIKERS – PUBLIC *****

  183. DI
    November 3rd, 2007 | 10:24

    Mr X., would you consider putting NSFW tags next to NSFW links and not putting porn-ish type pictures at the main picture. I don’t mind having the porn links themselves. Perhaps making an adult-ish blog on the side?

  184. hi
    November 3rd, 2007 | 10:36

    such low lives….. they want p0rn everywhere….

  185. StickyfingahZ
    November 3rd, 2007 | 10:40

    NOthing explicit is showing,I dont see anything wrong,But then again,I aint gonna grumble at a site that posts up free stuff.
    I usually check the comment box for rapidshare links and comments on the quality of the film,seems like this title should have a crying box instead of a comment box.

  186. StickyfingahZ
    November 3rd, 2007 | 10:42

    just checked it,199 seeders and 313 leechers….looks like some people like it.

  187. Stop It
    November 3rd, 2007 | 10:44

    Enough is enough Mr.X. we’ve had enough of your bad taste AND in porn too.
    People have said they don’t want porn on this site. Are you willing to sacrifice your net traffic for your EGO and amusement of porn?
    Are you so confident and arrogant enough that people will surely come and deal with whatever crap you post?
    Collective admin please GROW a pair and ban Mr.X from the team of staff.

  188. alpha
    November 3rd, 2007 | 11:00

    Ah here it comes again, the typical disgusting american puritanistic bigottery.
    First of all, this release is not porn, in fact such content is perfectly legal to broadcast on primetime TV in most civilized countries. For gods sake, you will probably see more nude boobs watching free TV on a typical afternoon in europe.
    Second, this site is not for kids, the scene is not for kids, the internet in general is nothing for kids and a lot of movies definitly aren’t made for kids. Every sane persons knows that and makes sure that his children don’t get into contact with content like “Saw” or “Hostel” etc., cause that is gonna hurt your child much more, than seeing some naked boobs, which after all is perfectly natural, in contrast to torturing people to death, or eating the brains of your fellow human beeings.
    Face it, the typical american kid sees thousands of brutal homicides on TV, but as soon as some nudity is shown, the christian hypocrats go ballistic, that’s just plain stupidity. Maybe the complainers schould move to Saudi Arabia or to Afghanistan, no boobies and no pron there, guaranteed.

    As far as it comes to this release, it’s boring crap, not worth the download, might be better to save the space and instead post some decent documentaries.

  189. No!
    November 3rd, 2007 | 11:00

    No we want Mr.X with out him the will be no tv scenes here…
    he posts more than 50% of content on this site everyday….
    but we want him to stop posting all that crap….

  190. Big_Mac
    November 3rd, 2007 | 11:14

    you are one horny dude mr.x :P

  191. steeel
    November 3rd, 2007 | 11:20

    I agree with some of the others. Release log is my home page. My wife uses this computer sometimes and probably does not appreciate the porn, especially that front page center advertisement with the picture of some chick getting cornholed. So now I have a different homepage until the porn dissapears.

  192. adam
    November 3rd, 2007 | 12:06

    LOL@ all the holier than thou attitudes in this thread.

    So you will pirate software and movies, but if theres a nipple involved, all of a sudden you are offended? Sheesh.

  193. S1omone
    November 3rd, 2007 | 12:10

    I appriciate nudity on rlslog. pls post more!

  194. pacman
    November 3rd, 2007 | 12:17

    Mr. X. You’re doing a just great job with these posts… Please keep them coming…

  195. oXmike
    November 3rd, 2007 | 12:22

    Why not just use “Pornleacher”. Surely, that is what the link is there for. Anyone must be blind to see that it’s run by the same people who run Rlslog.

    oX.

  196. Cool
    November 3rd, 2007 | 12:30

    Cool, let the links to porn sites and rapidshare links begin. Share all your links to porns here guys.

    We don’t want to be hypocrite now do we? So what are you waiting for? Start!

  197. pornholio
    November 3rd, 2007 | 12:36

    @191 Steel

    You wife might be scared? offended? shocked?
    From *SOFTCORE* adult media???

    You best block ALL ACCESS to the internet for her, ALSO better get the parental controls on the tele going, and definitely DO NOT take her out in public.

    You people are amazing, what f**king rock do you live under???

  198. sinuous
    November 3rd, 2007 | 12:47

    bunch of babies on this site

    dont like it, skip it and scroll down to the next release.
    stop acting like idiots

  199. James
    November 3rd, 2007 | 12:55

    Here we go again with Mr.X and if my maths are correct X = fukin idiot!

  200. No!
    November 3rd, 2007 | 13:07

    if x = y
    y is james
    x is Mr.X
    then y = “f*kin idiot!”
    lol Mr.X stop this crap

  201. Livio Lee
    November 3rd, 2007 | 13:15

    Thank you for the post, I`m a man,I really like nude women, I never see anything wrong with that.

  202. Owner
    November 3rd, 2007 | 13:18

    Thank you for the post, I`m a man,I really like nude women[2]

  203. obviousx2
    November 3rd, 2007 | 13:43

    let me summarize most of these posts

    ” wha wha wha, i think that the entire internet should be inline with my personal beliefs. ”

    its porn. you are on a site has questionable legality in certain countries.

    if you are doing something that could get you years in prison.. yet you cant stand the site of a naked chick..

    well hell… mayb a big manly prison isnt the ” last place ” that you would like to be ;P

    on a side note.. most of you have nothing to do with the “scene ” or anything underground.. sites like these.. while awesome.. are the AOL of the internet.. built for non technical/lazy fakkers.

  204. lollerblader
    November 3rd, 2007 | 13:45

    This is a bit s_cky.

  205. James
    November 3rd, 2007 | 13:50

    this site is about being a source for early scene releases (of questionable legality yes) and people come here BECAUSE it doesn’t deluge with pawn and other sh!t, I have no problem with pawn but that isn’t why I come to rlslog, that is why I don’t want to see it posted.

  206. George Bush (not the GB ;))
    November 3rd, 2007 | 13:54

    How about an own section for this stuff??
    Own site would be great but with the own section we’d have an illusion of a crap-free blog??

  207. fdsfdsfsdads
    November 3rd, 2007 | 14:02

    I think ill wait for aXXo release….

  208. bluemax
    November 3rd, 2007 | 14:12

    don’t post this type of rubbish, if you must…have a separate section, this site used to be quality.

Comments are closed.