thanks.

No one said that white people forced blacks into slavery. You misquoted rickybobby(doh!), who actually said “white people used blacks as slaves”.

Fact is, and you cannot argue this, some white people (yes, and some black people), did force blacks into slavery. Are you suggesting that slavery was voluntary?

Holy crap. Hopefully this lesson will teach you to think before speaking to avoid making such huge, idiotic blunders in the future.

If anyone cares about this planet,our children’s children future,the way World Central Banking has manipulated the masses,corrupt administrations,abd corporations,….do something,…any action is better than no reaction. We need change,….serious change,…we need a revolution.

Zeitgeist

http://isohunt.com/torrents.php?ihq=zeitgeist

Password is http://www.divxturka.net

are the chinesse mybe white… i asume you have some issues with white people??

btw.. white people cant stand in the sun long, so global warming is gonna backfire on their health..

I would not for a minute suggest there was no “evidence” for AGW, as you indeed acknowledge conflicting “evidence”. Imho, neither side has “proof”, certainly nothing that can be demonstrated by replication.

What is it with this “funding” thing by the way? Firstly, “it ain’t necessarily so”, and secondly, so what? If funding from interested parties were an inherently bad thing, there wouldn’t be much to show in the way of pharmaceutical research to name just one field.

For any others who loudly claim “big oil” etc behind views not to their own liking, we could look at (non-scientist) Al Gore and see if he has anything to gain from his agenda … hmm…let me think, surely he’s playing it straight down the middle (pure science and objectively at that), isn’t he?

Environmental agencies have to keep busy doing something, and we all like a focus, a goal and hey, if we can gain mainstream support, we can feel good together.

I think you lower the tone of your attempted argument by suggesting that just a few dentists and some farmers oppose your belief (people in the know are laughing at you). By way of illumination, and ignoring dentists & farmers (if any!), there’s still a few Phd’s signing off on the letter reported at http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=164002

Never mind grading, who amongst us is qualified to “settle the debate”? Are you a climatologist with some cred’s or were you one, does that make your science incontrovertible?

I do not “claim”, my credentials are real. If you’re looking for evidence you just have to open a scientific journal in a field of science connected with this issue. For every study denying global warming as an effect of man’s activity (usually with an oil company funding it) you’ll find 100 that accept the anthropic cause of global warming.

You want a source? How about EVERY enviromental agency from EVERY civilized country have issued warnings about this. Do you know how many science academies this represents? How many pHds in hundreds of universities?

Honestly, anyone who thinks the scientific community is not concerned with this is simply ignorant on this field.

The fact that some of you are claiming that the scientific community is on your side in this debate is proof enough that you’ve never even opened a scientific journal. There is a reason why there isn’t a list with scientists supporting the rational side of the issue. It’s just they are so damn many of them that it would take a house full of papper to collect half the names. Your 17,000 “scientists” (wich include a majority BS degrees in unrelated fields BTW) are peanuts. Heck just google up global warming in the wikipedia and notice the scientific backing it has.

And against this you have what? Hmmm dentists and some farmers?

But you’re right in saying science has changed the way to see some things. On the other hand is has been much more right dead on and did not need to move from the initial idea.

Plus you do not have enough knowlage in this field to “grade” anyone, much less someone who does this for a living.

@52 Yammitor

I believe you’re the clown here for presenting that ridiculous article from someone who don’t know crap about what he is talikning about as if it proof of something. In fact the idiot who wrote that missunderstood the findings completely. In a clear display of ignorance and plain stupidity (with a little bias in the mix).

People in the know are laughing at you.

Time to stop paying or governments to rip us off and give up some money to help where ist really needed.

the bigest factor that has the most influence on our climate is the sun, and there is a lot of things that are happening on the sun right at this moment. (leran more -> solar cycle)

to explain you how a CO2 is not a major factor, imagine that CO2 rises for 100%, the temp. rises for couple degrees and we adapt, but if the sun gets twice as hot as it is… well i think i dont need to tel you what would happen

i know its an absurd case, but its for those that know nothing about… ANYTHING

That’s an interesting story but that website has to be one of the funniest i’ve seen in a long time.

“Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias”. Since when is the US media Liberal???

Take a look at some of the comments, there’s some real in-bred hicks lurking in there!