Releaselog

300 PROPER TS xVID-LRC

Just a quick note about the proper version of latest 300 telesync. Although many people found the previous release pretty good with excellent image quality (for TS), guys from LRC found one problem about it. This is the fact that there’re few mins or secs of video missing because of the removal of MPAA warnings. 20th described this in their initial NFO, but LRC didn’t like it anyway, so here’s just another telesync with little more video footage. There’s really no need to download it though, if you already have the previous one…

300.PROPER.TS.xVID-LRC

2 CD, 1.4 GB, lrc-300a, lrc-300b
640×256 px, MP3 VBR audio
samples #1, #2, #3

TorrentIMDBNFOMovie Info

Comments (37)

Feel free to post your 300 PROPER TS xVID-LRC torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. DiKi
    March 14th, 2007 | 15:22

    This rls is better. But the picture quality is bad for a movie like this… i think a R5 would be just fine…

  2. jeroen
    March 14th, 2007 | 15:42

    What IDIOTS call this “excellent image quality”…

  3. chippxero
    March 14th, 2007 | 15:44

    i’m getting tempted more and more from the story point of view but i think i am going to wait for a bloody good copy before i download.

  4. smackdaddy
    March 14th, 2007 | 15:51

    Go see this movie! We should support quality cinema by visiting our local theater. This is a fantastic flick, one of the best I’ve seen in a year. I can’t wait for the HD version, I was distracted by the film grain, the effects in the HD release will be even more incredible.

  5. March 14th, 2007 | 15:53

    i agree with smackdaddy, who can watch these great war flicks in TS quality? go watch it in the cinema… or at least wait for dvd/dvdrip

  6. March 14th, 2007 | 15:53

    smackdaddy: i will :) i just need to wait few more days before it arrives to my local cinema, they are somehow delayed…

  7. Adam
    March 14th, 2007 | 15:58

    Damn straitht! This movie is incredible, have seen the movie trailer in 1080dpi and OMG the quality and the effects is awsome. Cant wait for a DVDrip release or HDrip rls. When are they going to rls it?

  8. my name
    March 14th, 2007 | 16:03

    Better to see in a Theater than in a computer screen

  9. tahé
    March 14th, 2007 | 16:55

    im from tunisia and there are never new movies on our (great ) theaters :( except for MI movies ! but we are update thanks to the divx lool ^^ everyone buying the copy cds !! and this movie is incredible !!! i would do anything to see it on a good theater :’( !!!! anyone has a solution :p invite me to the us or else i invite to tunisia on the summer lol (beach and …. )

  10. Rajashekar
    March 14th, 2007 | 17:00

    Can we please have a DVDScr to srart with, DvD Rips & HD 1080p to follow ;-)

  11. Ronnie
    March 14th, 2007 | 17:54

    The 1080p trailer was awesome, cant wait to watch this movie in a better quality.

  12. Hugh
    March 14th, 2007 | 18:43

    Best viewed in Imax… if your local cinemas offer the movie in IMAX. Great flick will definitely buy it on HD 1080P.

  13. crimson
    March 14th, 2007 | 19:05

    ya i will watch it in the cinema but nevertheless this is by far one of the slowest torrents i ever downloaded ;p
    291 B/s download ;p
    seeds 0 (92) peers 50 (2865)

  14. Joe Co
    March 14th, 2007 | 19:37

    Glad to see so many wanting and willing to wait for quality rips. If we all stay away from Cams and mediocre TS’s, they’ll eventually go away.

    Some of us don’t like going to theatres. My home theatre rocks, why would I want to go to a crummy mall theatre with a medium screen, sticky floors, Plastic seats, overbearing bass, yelling kids, and stale popcorn?

    If Hollywood would just embrace the internet, I’d be willing to pay up to 9 bucks for for good movies as long as I can burn at least one DVD.

    Older, indie, and B movies price at 2-6 dollars. They’d make B-i-l-l-i-o-n-s, and piracy would drop dramatically.

  15. Milos-Belgrade
    March 14th, 2007 | 20:11

    Haha… how stupid quality this is…

  16. schism123
    March 14th, 2007 | 23:59

    @ Joe Co,

    it still doesnt make a difference, if people have the choice to pay for a movie or get it free what do you think they would choose? so piracy wouldnt drop dramatically

  17. orotrub
    March 15th, 2007 | 00:38

    @Joe Co: I agree completely! I can’t stand going to a theater when I could be watching at home sitting on a comfortable sofa and have a beer and a smoke while I watch. I would gladly pay the nine bucks to watch it at home.

  18. Joe Co
    March 15th, 2007 | 02:07

    schism123, all you have to do is look at Itunes. It’s not perfect but millions are using it instead of “free” Limewire, etc. Why? Ease of use, peace of mind, quality product, etc.

    I download movies, but buy many also. Looks like I’ll do both with “300″. Theres something about high quality picture, liner notes and dvd extras that make a good movie even better.

    Ever download a mislabeled, out of sync, or bad quality rip?
    ever wasted time burning a coaster?
    …yea me too. Time is money.

    If I can download a high quality movie direct from the studio ready to burn to DVD instead of hoping I’m downloading a good copy or standing in line at Best Buy, I know many would.

    more choices , more money.

  19. Felica
    March 15th, 2007 | 03:42

    LRC is a bunch of lame groups who think they can do better just because of a insignificant MPAA warning removals..in fact your quality sucks even more..

  20. moaningtwats
    March 15th, 2007 | 04:23

    Jeez stop fukim complaining you dumb asses, its free and who gives a shit if you would rather wait for a dvd rip or R5? I never understand why poor fuckers like you complain at a freebie in the first place. Dont like it dont download it but dont sit there whinning like a fuckin baby about it afterwards.

  21. rick5446
    March 15th, 2007 | 04:26

    Seems the release before this has a little better video

  22. keys
    March 15th, 2007 | 06:59

    i agree with joe co

    that some people just don’t like going to the cinema
    i haven’t been in many months even when i coulda seen the free myspace screening of this movie in imax

    i have at least 20 movies to choose from everytime i want to watch a movie so i can be patient and wait for this one whenever a good copy comes

  23. Nigel
    March 15th, 2007 | 08:17

    I agree with moaningtwats, If you dont like it dont download it, Stop MOANING about something your getting for free.

  24. Robbie
    March 16th, 2007 | 00:12

    Man…I couldn’t wait to see this,although I tried so much to wait until I get to see this in the cinemas….I just couldn’t,was so impressed will even pay to watch it again!!! Just to catch the blacked out scenes I didn’t get to see properly,anyway good quality and sound…You won’t be sorry you saw it here first…Keep up the good work!!!

  25. Joe Co
    March 16th, 2007 | 20:42

    Nobody’s “MOANING”, we’re discussing. Yea I can go outside and find some free dogshit, but I’m not gonna make a sandwich with it.

    I understand there will always be a few of you that enjoy watching a movie with no detail, washed out color, and worse sound than a G.I.joe walkie-talkie.

    That’s fine, but the main point of the comments section is to talk about the quality of the movie.

  26. Joe Co
    March 16th, 2007 | 20:54

    while I’m here, did rlslog miss “Goyas Ghosts” ?

    Great movie I watched last night:
    http://www.mininova.org/tor/619608
    http://imdb.com/title/tt0455957/

    Starring Stellan Skarsgård & Natalie Portman, need I say more?

  27. DPG
    March 16th, 2007 | 21:50

    I’m having trouble with unzipping the files with winzip is anyone else having trouble with this movie?

  28. Jak Ma Lef Polo
    March 17th, 2007 | 01:01

    no trouble unzipping with winrar. ts is cam upgrade? looked like another cam version. Movie was great and will go see at the cinema as well as buy the DVD. Good thing about d/l free movies is that u can check its worth, trailers and adverts show the best scenes in a movie, but it’ll piss u off paying alot of money for only that!

  29. jb
    March 17th, 2007 | 05:34

    lol the internet is the only place i know where people can be so much shit for free they would normally have to pay for and still complain.What is amazing is as much as they complain they still wont shell out the money to buy it.

  30. B-Mad
    March 17th, 2007 | 06:34

    i agree with moanintwats. If i am downloading a torrent for free, the last thing i expect is “perfect” quality. So why complain and discourage others who considered these movies good in terms of a freebie? after all the what the ratings are according to.

  31. ondrasekh
    March 17th, 2007 | 08:45
  32. teflondon
    March 17th, 2007 | 20:02

    downloaded both
    300 TS XViD-20th which has a bit missing but plays fine and
    300 PROPER TS xVID-LRC which looks a bit brighter and has the missing 45 secs but cd one locks my pc up
    tried fixing it ect and its the only avi ive got that does this anyone else have any lock ups with cd one of this release
    not really important now as ive wiped it just thought id ask

  33. Bisaya
    March 19th, 2007 | 16:22

    We have to thank the CAM/TS/TC release groups for at least showing us a very early preview of what we may INTEND to pay for, buy or download later via a DVDRip. Some of us just have no patience so they’re just trying to scratch our itch. Bitching about the image and sound quality, although human nature, does not really help any. It’s a CAM for hell’s sake. What would you expect? The release group has actually paid for watching the movie in a cinema or screening, invested in videocam equipment and probably TS mechanisms for proper TS, and then laid their butts on the legal line only to brag to us that they can do it – so why put them down for their efforts? If you can’t say anything good, then shut your pie hole, and stop downloading CAMs/TSs/TCs. Or simply wait for a DVD Rip, you impatient no-good leeching moron(s).

    Personally, I seldom download CAMs/TSs/TCs – with exceptions on some really anticipated movies like this one (300) – especially when it’s an Underground Scene release that’s wrapped up in cumbersome RAR files. But, admittedly, beggars can’t be choosers, although you can still hear us complain especially if we’ve been given only a lousy dollar split in pennies. So, you, as a responsible stupid lamer leecher, must figure out for yourself if you’re really that itchy enough to download a RAR’ed CAM/TS/TC release after mulling over your supposedly precious bandwidth and allegedly cherished disk space. And just pay respect to wherever it’s due.

    Don’t flood the Internet with senseless weaselly complaints. We’ve got enough of that already. Contribute.

  34. damnit
    March 19th, 2007 | 16:39

    hey how i can watch movie subtlited? since i am deaf cannot enjoy without closed caption. thanks.

  35. Anonymous
    March 21st, 2007 | 04:33

    uhhh the tracker sucks, too much hash file failures and wasted, I’ve downloaded 2.63g size of file but 470mb are only non corrupted..

  36. Anonymous
    March 21st, 2007 | 07:00

    damnit, you have to wait for the dvd-rip, only dvd versions have subs on it

  37. Pharos
    March 22nd, 2007 | 13:39

    One thing about 300.PROPER.TS.xVID-LRC
    CD1 & CD2 have different audiobitrates. I had to change them both to 192 MP3. Merge audio and video separately and then (with nandub) add audio to video. This also fixes a slight audio 1-2ms on CD2.
    I found that lots of seeders are sending corrupted crap aswell but it came through for me just fine (except the 1st 5 minutes.
    The look of the video I believe is due to a filter having been used while making the movie & is supposed to be this way.
    by the way they mention 2 things in the movie which can never be correct. 1 Century (roman) and 2 August (same problem, roman)

Leave a reply