Releaselog

10,000 BC DVDRip XviD-iNQONTROL

Just a little update here so you guys don’t ask about this in the comments… THIS IS NOT THE DVDRIP, just a mislabled R5, which is a shame. The retail date for this is June 24th, so expect a DVDRip sometime in mid June, following the usual DVDRip release time frame. BTW iNQONTROL just got a nice new nfo, so congrats ;)

In a remote mountain tribe, the young hunter, D’Leh (Steven Strait), has found his heart’s passion – the beautiful Evolet (Camilla Belle). When a band of mysterious warlords raid his village and kidnap Evolet, D’Leh is forced to lead a small group of hunters to pursue the warlords to the end of the world to save her. Driven by destiny, the unlikely band of warriors must battle saber-tooth tigers and prehistoric predators and, at their heroic journey’s end, they uncover a Lost Civilization. Their ultimate fate lies in an empire beyond imagination, where great pyramids reach into the skies. Here they will take their stand against a powerful god who has brutally enslaved their people.

10.000.BC.DVDRip.XviD-iNQONTROL

Samples: #1, #2, #3
640×272, 804kbps, 25 FPS, MP3 130kbps, 104min, 701MB
IMDB 4.9/10, NFO, Torrent, NZB

Comments (105)

Feel free to post your 10,000 BC DVDRip XviD-iNQONTROL torrent, subtitles, samples, free download, quality, NFO, rapidshare, megashares, sendspace, filesonic, filefactory, netload, crack, serial, keygen, requirements or whatever-related comments here. Don't be rude (permban), use only English, don't go offtopic and read FAQ before asking a question. Owners of this website aren't responsible for content of comments.
  1. cHarNe2
    May 6th, 2008 | 20:54

    at last :)

  2. kazam
    May 6th, 2008 | 20:54

    huzzah for dreadlocked neanderthals.

  3. Protskitotski
    May 6th, 2008 | 20:55

    this release sucks even harder than the movie itself ! what a waste

  4. piNky
    May 6th, 2008 | 20:55

    @2 lol

    Sweet, will watch this even if it’s a R5. Thanks!

  5. SEAR
    May 6th, 2008 | 20:55

    Change the topic if it isn’t a dvdrip.

  6. May 6th, 2008 | 20:55

    For those that don’t read the posts:

    THIS IS NOT THE DVDRIP… MISLABELED R5

  7. Links
    May 6th, 2008 | 20:56
  8. Jako
    May 6th, 2008 | 20:58

    1. cHarNe2

    I was about posting the same… ;)

  9. Josh
    May 6th, 2008 | 20:59
  10. DanesDK
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:04

    [ NUKE ] * 10.000.BC.DVDRip.XviD-iNQONTROL [misslabled.r5.and.dupe]

  11. lenny
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:06

    I personaly think that 4.9 imdb rating is a bit harsh this movie wasnt that bad, it wasnt great but better than alot of the crap released lately.

  12. Ksawery 11 :)
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:10

    this should be nuked

  13. MovieFan
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:11

    How is this different from Bald’s R5?

  14. Sgt Toomey
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:11

    The cure for insomnia. I feel asleep.

  15. Edyy
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:12

    4.9 on IMDB? are those people on drugs?

    This movie sucked more then 5 guys having sex with 6 guys

  16. May 6th, 2008 | 21:13

    @13

    It is…

    @14
    Its not besides the 2kbps better bitrate on the audio and 4kbps bitrate difference on the video :D

  17. Uhhhh
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:15

    So if it’s a mislabeled R5 why not just rename the topic of the post accordingly???

  18. smith
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:15
  19. May 6th, 2008 | 21:18

    @18

    Because the post is named according to the release name, and people would still be asking for this not knowing that I just renamed the fake DVDRip.

  20. se7ven
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:18

    Is there a better copy of Doomsday or Street kings Doomsday audio is Cam and Street kings comes in like Crap Is there any better copys yet like R5 or Dvdrip

  21. dfsdf
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:19

    The Movie is uber Crap! trying to be like 300 and apocalypto but fails badly.

  22. se7ven
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:19

    this movie Sucked for real Boring i thought pathfinder was better

  23. An idea...
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:21

    Why not delete the post then? If it’s mislabeled, previously posted and already nuked, why keep it up?

  24. May 6th, 2008 | 21:23

    @24

    Because idiots that think they’re 1337 because they “inform” us about releases they find on mininova would ask “Wheres the 10,000 BC DVDRip… Slow posting”

  25. LOL
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:25

    @25 – Well they prove they are more n00b than they are 1337 by going to Mininova for “new” releases :)

  26. anon
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:26

    I know it’s not a DVDRip, but R5 is DVD source, so its basically same stuff. Just not as good mastered probably, and often with Line/CAM audio, but not always.

  27. dfrgyfrt
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:26
  28. The Real Jew
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:28

    What Are You Talking About people . A DvdRip or Was it r5 Came Out Last Week . And Its A Clear Good Copy

  29. iNSANiA
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:38

    Don’t waste your time with this terrible movie.

  30. Another Idea
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:42

    Thanks for the torrent link that leads nowhere!

  31. the ogiginal idiot
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:46

    It’s a pathetic that rlslog uses http://www.newtorrents.info for every post they make. Haven’t you noticed that place usually doesn’t have the latest rls’ – i.e. like this one. What’s the point of linking to it when a good amount of the time it takes days for them to even get a proper torrent to show up?

    People should use mininova or other sites, newtorrents.info is a joke.

  32. spiffy
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:48

    not that good a movie anyways. i was expecting better considering thier budget.

  33. torrent link
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:49

    @21
    Street.Kings.DVDSCR.XviD-THS
    http://www.sceneleech.org/details.php?id=4552

  34. bubba
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:49

    i agree with #5

    change the damn title if it isnt so

  35. Zomg
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:50

    @32
    …the torrent-links always lead you to a search for the release on newtorrents.info

  36. Ezhra
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:50

    Nuked (bad.ivtc_dupe.frames)

  37. Bhaskar
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:53

    Dumb movie. Not worth watching. It’s 104 minutes of non-sense.

  38. Al_Dente
    May 6th, 2008 | 21:56

    Hmm…I’m guessing that if you review “The movie”, then review “The movie that’s better than THAT movie”, then review another that’s better than BOTH…it’s best to keep the original titles intact so we can tell the difference.

  39. ShameOnYou
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:01

    Horton fake, ASterix fake,this fake omg!!!

    ITS A SHAME!

  40. anyways
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:08

    I dont understand people who found that movie terrible. Like I mean, I know it’s not representative of the 10,000BC era, but still the movie is really entertaining, the special effects are awesome, the story is very good and the girl is damn hot. I like these kind of movies (war movies of old times, before the gun powder era…)

  41. Adam Jones
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:14

    i havnt seen such a steaming pile of uselessness for quite a while. the only redeeming features are the FX and the fact that Creationists get hot under the collar with all this prehistory stuff.

  42. Capt Spaulding
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:16

    So it’s an exact dupe, or is the sound better at all than last weeks R5, because the sound on that was kinda crappy Ill take this R5 if they had a better sound source, but I guess dupe means its a duplicate of that previous source?

  43. Al_Dente
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:19

    The “Creationists” were probably happy with the line “Some say they come from the stars” I think they should do a family guy episode for this one.

  44. ◄█ELCouz█►
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:20

    dupe from which rls ?

  45. Runcible Man
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:26

    Steve Strait is, I’m sorry to say, a poor actor. I’ve seen every single one of his films, solely because he grated with me from Xavier, and is without a doubt the most successful member of my class so far. However, he simply cannot act, not that he has had any roles yet that could challenge any serious actor’s talents. But still… disappointingly flat and unspectacular.

  46. Kovacs
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:30

    For all the haters…

    Ok…

    Think of the film this way…

    Remember the original Stargate movie? (The one with Kurt Russell & James Spader), well basically the guy that directed that was originally going to make a trilogy.

    After it’s poor performance the actors and money lenders pulled out…

    Stargate was bought up as TV series. Which they then created an entirely new history for.

    100000 BC is also made by the guy that made the original stargate.

    With that in mind…

    I ask you to watch this film again. The clues are all there! (Rah left after a slave uprising aprox. 10000BC/ the stars of Orion point the way/ the pyramids are much older than thought)

    Basically I’d say that the director still wanted to make his trilogy but had to make them more stand alone films (no stargate tag).

    Especially with another of his upcoming films being 2012. The end of the Mayan calendar. Funnily enough they had pyramids and believed in spacemen!

    Anyone spotting the tie-in?

    hate me if you like.
    Kovacs.

  47. Kovacs
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:31

    @45 That’s another example of a stargate tie in

  48. haters
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:36

    he grated?….is Xavier like some school for the learning diabled?

  49. haters
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:37

    i meant disabled…alumni from Xavier apparently

  50. hikaricore
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:40

    One of the worst movies I’ve seen since Legend.

  51. Al_Dente
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:43

    Kovacs

    Good info, thanks. The connections are all over the place when you look from that angle. Interesting.

  52. byte
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:51

    Heres some connections for you:

    This Movie + My Time = Not Happening

  53. Happy dude
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:55

    Cool – downloading this right now. From what I heard and red…This film seems wack. Well I don’t have anything to do tonight so I’ll just kickback and see what this movie is about lol. Anyway, thanks for this release and the whole scene activity.

  54. faps
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:56

    according to mayan history, they got all of their knowledge of time and astrology from a old white dude with white hair that came from the ocean. sorta like the “god” in this movie. he eventually took off back to sea tho. wut a douchebag. atlantis believers rejoice.

  55. nicky
    May 6th, 2008 | 23:03

    #
    hikaricore
    May 6th, 2008 | 22:40

    One of the worst movies I’ve seen since Legend.

    WTF??? Legend is classic compared to this garbage

  56. VI
    May 6th, 2008 | 23:10
  57. Rod
    May 6th, 2008 | 23:15

    pos movie anyway…

  58. caLm horiZons
    May 6th, 2008 | 23:21

    @Kovacs—I dont often post that much anymore, but i have to say that you have a valid point and yes i do spot the tie in and will keep watching with abated breath, its refreshing to see such an informed input by an oddball (Not a dig!) who has obviously thought about what he has to say … and its about time some one had a valid point regards a film rather than the usual tripe which seems to be the same as any other review.. PLease take heed and slow down with the downward spiral of unintoxicating input lately, i knoe you can only review whats tonly there — (lack of real homework!)Yes the scene brings the latest stuff, but hey who cant? MARTIN whats going on! Up down left right get it sorted and bring back the good old days when releaselog used to be RELEASELOG!! if you feel that you have to slag this off then do so its not a dig at the site, if you must know ive followed the site since early days and still will continue too…

  59. Smelly ballbag
    May 6th, 2008 | 23:21

    Damn, now I can’t have a good copy of this smelly ballbag of a movie. The director of this movie can drag his tongue all over my smelly, sweaty, musty ballsack, get right into the dark crevices and swallow all my cheese.

  60. marcmx
    May 6th, 2008 | 23:26

    Nuked (bad.ivtc_dupe.frames)

  61. ryan
    May 6th, 2008 | 23:52

    then why would you post the same R5 release twice????

  62. Someone Says...
    May 7th, 2008 | 00:14

    @63
    Try reading the posts b4 responding. See #s 20&25.

  63. djmedi4
    May 7th, 2008 | 00:26

    Awful, awful, awful movie.

    Shut it off after less than 15 minutes. Should have done it in a fake language, and NOT english. Killed it for me.

    You’d be better off watching static.

  64. mfc
    May 7th, 2008 | 00:34
  65. Michael Collins
    May 7th, 2008 | 00:49

    @22 and everyone else slamming this movie, ditto!

    But at least the handsome white cave man saved the ignorant black people from the proto-arabs!

  66. Merlyn
    May 7th, 2008 | 00:49

    @39 I agree just a bunch of jungle bunnies running around with some cgi mixed in.

  67. Jizz Park Colorado
    May 7th, 2008 | 01:15

    horrible movie, and very historically inaccurate. English wasn’t even around then, nor were anything else they show in this garbage.

  68. a
    May 7th, 2008 | 01:37

    which version has the best quality in video and sound? iNQONTROL, BaLD, or FXG?

  69. dfgds
    May 7th, 2008 | 01:51

    Anyone have Adrive link?

  70. pegasys
    May 7th, 2008 | 01:54

    This movie i have to say was as boring as bat***t, the only thing good about the movie were the special fx and not much else. It was very hard to get my head around the fact they were using mammoth’s for the hard labor 10,000 years bc..and the acting wasn’t much chop either. When i saw the priest’s and the temple and the mammoths it reminded me a bit of the Mummy meets Stargate. I think a rating of even 4.0 is a bit generous maybe 3.5. But for those who like this sort of mixture enjoy.

  71. mfc
    May 7th, 2008 | 02:24
  72. sinner n saint
    May 7th, 2008 | 02:33

    out of sync

    //// even more to the middle and the end.

    bald better…

  73. mfc
    May 7th, 2008 | 02:49

    10.000.BC.R5.LiNE.DVDR-BaLD I HAVE THIS ITS PERFECT-http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4159357/10.000.BC.R5.LiNE.DVDR-BaLD

  74. mfc
    May 7th, 2008 | 02:50
  75. jamse
    May 7th, 2008 | 02:50

    XP SP3 on windows update

  76. pee pants
    May 7th, 2008 | 03:08

    Worst movie ever, literally.

  77. ryan
    May 7th, 2008 | 03:10

    sorry i didnt read ALL the comments… #64

  78. Xerox©
    May 7th, 2008 | 04:22

    10,000 BC DVDRip XviD-iNQONTROL

    Only video sample :D

  79. Xerox©
    May 7th, 2008 | 04:23
  80. lifehacker
    May 7th, 2008 | 05:54
  81. anomily
    May 7th, 2008 | 06:06

    I don’t get it, wtf is going through the minds of these idiots who create the R5’s and label them as DVDRips?

  82. xpiderx
    May 7th, 2008 | 06:37

    INQONTROL posible take this dvdr as source 10000.BC.DVDCustom.NTSC.Line-ITL2.0
    same subs

  83. Inevitable
    May 7th, 2008 | 07:00

    No way language was so developed 12,000 years ago. So annoying from first to last minute. Hollywood at its worst. Special effects + script mixing everything from Atlantis to telepathy and resurrection + hot girl = POS
    It is of course difficult to make good movies without loads of crappy fantasy in it. It just reminded me how good “Apocalypto” was.

  84. persiadownloads
    May 7th, 2008 | 07:19
  85. Mikkel
    May 7th, 2008 | 07:35

    Why would you post if its just an old R5? or is it better..?

    Anyway thanks :)

  86. Talix
    May 7th, 2008 | 08:40

    Out of sync, I recommend not to download. Even if the audio was in sync, this movie isn’t the best.

  87. Nocturne
    May 7th, 2008 | 08:50

    @42 Why are so many people hating this movie? Was 300 historically accurate? Was the Gladiator historically accurate? It´s FICTION people, and this movie – though flawed, is damn-well entertaining to watch!

  88. rapidshare
    May 7th, 2008 | 09:50

    I Watched it yesterday and pic quality 10/10, but audio was little worse and sometimes the lowest frequency was fart, especially in music. Greeting!

    SAMPLE:
    http://rapidshare.com/files/113156900/iq-10bc-sample.avi
    ~5,5MB

  89. mina
    May 7th, 2008 | 09:58

    [img]http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w13/lacie_legs/ironman9_large.jpg[/img]

    Bonus Ending that appears after the credits on the movie Iron Man (cause many ppl missed it =) )

    Runtime : 42 secs.

    Download and keep this alive by saying thankx plzz
    [code]http://rapidshare.com/files/113157454/Iron_Man_Bonus_Ending.avi[/code]

  90. Weyoun
    May 7th, 2008 | 10:34

    Why do you guys keep posting nuked and mislabeled releases? The appeal of this site is to quickly check what’s out, and to assess if it’s worth grabbing. If you post bad R5 releases with DVDRip in the header, I’ll still have to “filter” through the results to determine if it’s worth grabbing. The title alone should tell me that, imo.

    Other than that, love the site. :)

  91. Protoculture
    May 7th, 2008 | 10:59

    it was actually a nice movie, but it is not the best.

    I was waiting for some aliens to appear though. :D

    and Camilla Belle is pretty too. check her gallery:

    http://swagmanmag.com/gallery/solo_babes/camilla_belle

  92. fart
    May 7th, 2008 | 11:40

    kinda lame movie… but yes Camilla Belle is pretty

  93. BestAhmet
    May 7th, 2008 | 13:04
  94. BestAhmet
    May 7th, 2008 | 13:05
  95. BestAhmet
    May 7th, 2008 | 13:08
  96. -_-
    May 7th, 2008 | 14:17


    [NUKE!]

    ALL.10,000.BC.Releases [A.TERRIBLE.TERRIBLE.FILM]

    -T

  97. MOO
    May 7th, 2008 | 19:30

    why its not nuked on nforce..?
    http://www.nforce.nl/index.php?nfoid=123752

  98. PT
    May 7th, 2008 | 19:43

    OUT OF SYNC!! DON’T DOWNLOAD THIS!!!
    AND THE MOVIE ISN’T HAS BAD HAS THEY SAY

  99. jackassmachine
    May 8th, 2008 | 18:14

    apocalypto was way better then this ripoff.atleast let the sabretooth eat someone.

  100. Little Green Man
    May 9th, 2008 | 00:40

    I agree with @89. Its not a freakin documentary, its a movie for crying out loud, no, people might not of had a developed language system back then but does that mean that Jurassic Park sucks because there really haven’t brought dinosaurs back to life yet? IT IS JUST A MOVIE!!!!!!!!!

  101. Little Green Man
    May 9th, 2008 | 00:47

    I agree with @89. Its just a movie for crying out loud. No, they might not have developed language back then, but does that mean that Jurassic Park sucks because we really haven’t brought T-rex back from the past yet?

  102. eogl1985
    May 11th, 2008 | 23:10

Leave a reply